Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →AI-powered design of targeted gene panels for clinical and research applications including cancer diagnostics, pharmacogenomics, and rare disease testing.
.claude/skills/gene-panel-design-agent/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 27% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 57% | 0% |
<!--
#
#
-->
The Gene Panel Design Agent provides AI-driven design of targeted sequencing panels for clinical diagnostics, cancer profiling, pharmacogenomics, and research applications.
User: "Design a comprehensive solid tumor panel covering actionable mutations and resistance markers."
Agent Action:
bashpython3 Skills/Genomics/Gene_Panel_Design_Agent/panel_designer.py \ --disease solid_tumor \ --gene_sources nccn,civic,oncokb \ --platform hybcap \ --target_size 1.5mb \ --include_fusions true \ --include_cnv_backbone true \ --output panel_design/
| Factor | Impact | Optimization | |--------|--------|--------------| | Panel size | Cost, depth | Prioritize high-evidence genes | | GC content | Coverage uniformity | Probe design, blockers | | Repeat regions | Mapping challenges | Avoid or boost coverage | | Homologous regions | Misalignment | Unique design, blockers | | Structural variants | Detection | Intronic coverage, breakpoints | | CNV detection | Require backbone | Tiled probes across genome |
| Source | Content | Evidence Level | |--------|---------|----------------| | OncoKB | Actionable alterations | FDA/guideline levels | | CIViC | Clinical variants | Community-curated | | ClinVar | Pathogenic variants | Classification criteria | | NCCN | Guideline genes | Clinical practice | | COSMIC | Cancer genes | Census tier 1/2 |
Comprehensive Cancer Panel (300-700 genes):
Focused Tumor Panel (50-100 genes):
Pharmacogenomics Panel:
Rare Disease Panel:
Gene Ranking:
Probe Optimization:
Coverage Prediction:
Performance Metrics:
Reference Materials:
| Platform | Typical Size | Depth | CNV Capable | |----------|--------------|-------|-------------| | Hybrid capture | 1-3 Mb | 500-1000x | Yes (with backbone) | | Amplicon | 10-500 kb | 1000-5000x | Limited | | Anchored multiplex | Variable | Variable | Fusions |
| File | Content | Purpose | |------|---------|---------| | panel.bed | Target coordinates | Sequencing design | | probes.fa | Probe sequences | Manufacturing | | genes.csv | Gene list with rationale | Documentation | | validation.pdf | QC plan | Laboratory setup |
AI Group - Biomedical AI Platform
<!-- AUTHOR_SIGNATURE: 9a7f3c2e-MD-BABU-MIA-2026-MSSM-SECURE -->
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 30,562 | 2,259 | -93% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,808 | 1,679 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 15,030 | 13,576 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,868 | 3,722 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 10,378 | 10,901 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,920 | 3,230 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 16,369 | 27,172 | +66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,136 | 6,377 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 17,401 | 10,899 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,547 | 3,235 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 10,637 | 7,747 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,924 | 2,771 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 9,147 | 2,508 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,578 | 1,627 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 14,391 | 12,346 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,567 | 3,449 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,524 | 9,536 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,295 | 2,943 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 12,612 | 7,967 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,117 | 2,505 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 6,176 | 2,313 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,022 | 1,602 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 21,740 | 1,680 | -92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,369 | 1,486 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 10,955 | 1,461 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,450 | 1,481 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 8,909 | 2,891 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,386 | 1,603 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 14,755 | 13,546 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,374 | 3,542 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 14,870 | 10,217 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,334 | 2,807 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 16,483 | 1,299 | -92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 900 | 1,417 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 9,625 | 7,232 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,568 | 2,360 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 6,694 | 4,120 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,081 | 1,893 | +75% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,919 | 14,161 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,446 | 3,635 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 8,847 | 4,141 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,443 | 1,874 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 3,315 | 4,598 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 614 | 2,023 | +229% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 7/26/2026 | +9% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.