Test Architecture Strategy

Test Architecture Strategy

Use this skill to reason about the shape of a test suite, not one test at a time. The goal is a suite that gives confidence, runs quickly enough for flow, and still catches integration failures at important boundaries.

Source Traceability

Primary source: Harry Percival, Test-Driven Development with Python, 3rd ed. Guidance is transformed and paraphrased from chapter 27 and Appendix A, especially test desiderata, fast/slow test tradeoffs, test pyramid thinking, boundaries, ports and adapters, functional core/imperative shell, and when to rethink architecture.

Workflow

1. Inventory the current suite.

   • Identify unit, integration, functional/end-to-end, smoke, and manual checks.
   • Capture runtime, flake rate, CI split, and developer feedback path.

2. Classify the pain.

   • Slow feedback.
   • Brittle structure-coupled tests.
   • Mock-heavy tests with low confidence.
   • Missing boundary coverage.
   • Too many end-to-end tests.

3. Choose the target shape.

   • Fast tests for core logic and detailed cases.
   • Integration tests at real boundaries.
   • A small number of end-to-end tests for critical journeys.
   • Production monitoring or smoke checks where tests are not enough.

4. Move one slice at a time.

   • Extract pure logic or service boundaries.
   • Replace exhaustive end-to-end coverage with lower-level tests plus one journey.
   • Add contract or integration checks for external systems.
   • Define a runtime red line before the suite becomes painful.

Read test-architecture-patterns.md for audit questions, migration patterns, and decision tables.

Decision Rules

• If tests are slow but valuable, first separate fast local feedback from full CI proof.
• If unit tests require databases or frameworks everywhere, identify pure core logic that can move inward.
• If mocks dominate, use architecture seams rather than more mocks.