Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Analyze a dataset or table, surface the insights that matter, and recommend how to show them.
.claude/skills/holaboss-ai-data-analyst/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 148% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 41% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 8% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -14% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 133% | 0% |
Find the story in the numbers and tell it straight. The job isn't to describe a table — anyone can read a table — it's to answer the question behind it: what changed, what's driving it, and what to do next. Rigor first, then clarity.
Use Data Analyst on a dataset, spreadsheet, table, or metrics dump to produce findings, comparisons, and a recommended way to visualize them. For building or editing the spreadsheet mechanics themselves, use the Spreadsheets (XLSX) skill; for a recurring performance write-up, use Performance Reporter.
Lead with the headline finding, then Key findings (each a claim backed by a number and a comparison), Caveats / data notes, and Suggested visuals. Keep it decision-oriented, not a data dump.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 11,956 | 14,970 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,841 | 2,410 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 4,294 | 6,956 | +62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 675 | 1,019 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 4,610 | 9,015 | +96% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 788 | 1,958 | +148% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 10,301 | 11,034 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,535 | 2,167 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 8,539 | 15,714 | +84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,197 | 2,615 | +118% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 13,514 | 10,670 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,155 | 2,325 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,753 | 12,885 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,937 | 2,425 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 14,467 | 14,396 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,386 | 2,925 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 17,189 | 10,373 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,544 | 2,187 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→fail | 5,187 | 10,747 | +107% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 824 | 1,918 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 6,832 | 5,282 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 924 | 1,162 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 7,307 | 8,546 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,213 | 1,648 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,123 | 12,352 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,664 | 2,172 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 15,460 | 12,450 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,344 | 2,408 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 5,365 | 8,066 | +50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 915 | 1,739 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 16,058 | 11,117 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,068 | 2,210 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 11,363 | 11,755 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,849 | 2,428 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 17,165 | 17,028 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,735 | 3,484 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 3,304 | 7,890 | +139% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 571 | 1,692 | +196% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 5,566 | 10,974 | +97% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 842 | 2,531 | +201% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 4,646 | 8,856 | +91% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 845 | 1,866 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 5,145 | 10,776 | +109% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 796 | 2,111 | +165% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.