Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Detect NTFS timestamp manipulation (MITRE T1070.006) by comparing $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME timestamps in the MFT. Uses analyzeMFT and Python to identify files with anomalous temporal patterns indicating anti-forensic timestomping activity.
.claude/skills/hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
Detect timestamp manipulation by analyzing NTFS MFT entries for discrepancies between $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME attributes.
Do not use as the sole detection method; advanced adversaries can manipulate both $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME timestamps (though the latter requires raw disk access and is much harder). Combine with USN Journal, $LogFile, and ShimCache/Amcache analysis for corroboration.
MFTECmd (Eric Zimmerman tool) or analyzeMFT for MFT parsingpandas for analysismft Python library (pip install mft) for programmatic MFT parsingpowershell# Method 1: Using KAPE to collect MFT and related artifacts .\kape.exe --tsource C: --tdest D:\Evidence\MFT_Collection --target !SANS_Triage # Method 2: Using FTK Imager CLI to extract $MFT ftkimager.exe \\.\C: D:\Evidence\mft_raw.bin --e01 --include $MFT # Method 3: Raw copy using RawCopy (handles locked NTFS system files) RawCopy.exe /FileNamePath:C:0 /OutputPath:D:\Evidence\ /OutputName:$MFT
bash# Method 4: On a mounted forensic image in Linux sudo mount -o ro,norecovery /dev/sdb1 /mnt/evidence sudo icat -o 2048 /dev/sdb 0 > /mnt/output/$MFT # Method 5: Using sleuthkit to extract MFT from disk image icat -o 2048 evidence.E01 0 > extracted_MFT
Use Eric Zimmerman's MFTECmd to produce a CSV with both $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME timestamps:
powershell# Parse MFT to CSV with all timestamp columns MFTECmd.exe -f "D:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv D:\Evidence\Parsed\ --csvf mft_parsed.csv # The output CSV contains these critical columns: # Created0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Created timestamp # LastModified0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Modified timestamp # LastAccess0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Accessed timestamp # LastRecordChange0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Entry Modified timestamp # Created0x30 - $FILE_NAME Created timestamp # LastModified0x30 - $FILE_NAME Modified timestamp # LastAccess0x30 - $FILE_NAME Accessed timestamp # LastRecordChange0x30 - $FILE_NAME Entry Modified timestamp
The core detection: $STANDARD_INFORMATION timestamps are easily modified by user-mode tools, but $FILE_NAME timestamps are updated only by the NTFS driver (kernel-mode). When SI timestamps are OLDER than FN timestamps, timestomping is likely:
pythonimport pandas as pd from datetime import datetime, timedelta def load_mft_data(csv_path): """Load MFTECmd parsed CSV output.""" df = pd.read_csv(csv_path, low_memory=False) # Parse timestamp columns timestamp_cols = [ "Created0x10", "LastModified0x10", "LastAccess0x10", "LastRecordChange0x10", "Created0x30", "LastModified0x30", "LastAccess0x30", "LastRecordChange0x30" ] for col in timestamp_cols: if col in df.columns: df[col] = pd.to_datetime(df[col], errors="coerce") return df def detect_timestomping(df): """Detect timestamp manipulation by comparing SI and FN attributes. Key indicators: 1. SI Created < FN Created (SI timestamp pushed back in time) 2. SI timestamps have nanoseconds = 0000000 (tool artifact) 3. SI Created < FN Entry Modified (impossible under normal NTFS behavior) 4. Large gap between SI and FN timestamps """ results = [] for idx, row in df.iterrows(): si_created = row.get("Created0x10") fn_created = row.get("Created0x30") si_modified = row.get("LastModified0x10") fn_modified = row.get("LastModified0x30") si_entry = row.get("LastRecordChange0x10") fn_entry = row.get("LastRecordChange0x30") if pd.isna(si_created) or pd.isna(fn_created): continue filepath = row.get("FileName", "unknown") parent_path = row.get("ParentPath", "") full_path = f"{parent_path}\\{filepath}" if parent_path else filepath indicators = [] # Detection 1: SI Created is BEFORE FN Created # Under normal NTFS operations, SI Created >= FN Created if si_created < fn_created: delta = fn_created - si_created indicators.append({ "check": "SI_Created < FN_Created", "si_value": str(si_created), "fn_value": str(fn_created), "delta": str(delta), "confidence": "high" }) # Detection 2: SI Modified is BEFORE FN Created # A file cannot be modified before it was created if pd.notna(si_modified) and si_modified < fn_created: indicators.append({ "check": "SI_Modified < FN_Created", "si_value": str(si_modified), "fn_value": str(fn_created), "confidence": "high" }) # Detection 3: Nanosecond precision check # Many timestomping tools set timestamps with zero nanoseconds if pd.notna(si_created): si_created_str = str(si_created) if ".000000" in si_created_str or si_created_str.endswith("00:00:00"): # Check if FN has normal nanosecond precision fn_str = str(fn_created) if ".000000" not in fn_str: indicators.append({ "check": "SI_nanoseconds_zeroed", "si_value": si_created_str, "fn_value": fn_str, "confidence": "medium" }) # Detection 4: Large time gap between SI and FN # Normal gap is seconds to minutes, not years if abs((si_created - fn_created).days) > 365: indicators.append({ "check": "SI_FN_gap_exceeds_1_year", "si_value": str(si_created), "fn_value": str(fn_created), "delta_days": abs((si_created - fn_created).days), "confidence": "high" }) # Detection 5: SI Entry Modified much later than SI Created # Indicates the SI attribute was rewritten if pd.notna(si_entry) and pd.notna(si_created): entry_delta = si_entry - si_created if entry_delta.days > 365 * 5: # Entry modified years after creation indicators.append({ "check": "SI_entry_modified_years_after_creation", "si_created": str(si_created), "si_entry_modified": str(si_entry), "confidence": "medium" }) if indicators: results.append({ "file_path": full_path, "entry_number": row.get("EntryNumber", ""), "in_use": row.get("InUse", True), "si_created": str(si_created), "fn_created": str(fn_created), "indicators": indicators, "highest_confidence": max(i["confidence"] for i in indicators), }) return results # Run detection df = load_mft_data("D:\\Evidence\\Parsed\\mft_parsed.csv") stomped_files = detect_timestomping(df) print(f"\nTimestomping Detection Results") print(f"{'='*60}") print(f"Total MFT entries analyzed: {len(df)}") print(f"Suspicious entries found: {len(stomped_files)}") print() for entry in sorted(stomped_files, key=lambda x: x["highest_confidence"], reverse=True): print(f"[{entry['highest_confidence'].upper()}] {entry['file_path']}") print(f" SI Created: {entry['si_created']}") print(f" FN Created: {entry['fn_created']}") for ind in entry["indicators"]: print(f" Check: {ind['check']} (confidence: {ind['confidence']})") print()
The USN Journal records metadata change events that persist even after timestomping:
pythondef correlate_with_usn_journal(stomped_files, usn_csv_path): """Cross-reference timestomped files with USN Journal entries. The USN Journal records a BASIC_INFO_CHANGE reason when timestamps are modified, providing corroborating evidence of timestomping. """ usn_df = pd.read_csv(usn_csv_path, low_memory=False) usn_df["UpdateTimestamp"] = pd.to_datetime(usn_df["UpdateTimestamp"], errors="coerce") corroborated = [] for entry in stomped_files: filename = entry["file_path"].split("\\")[-1] # Find USN entries for this file with BASIC_INFO_CHANGE usn_matches = usn_df[ (usn_df["Name"] == filename) & (usn_df["UpdateReasons"].str.contains("BASIC_INFO_CHANGE", na=False)) ] if not usn_matches.empty: entry["usn_corroboration"] = True entry["usn_change_times"] = usn_matches["UpdateTimestamp"].tolist() entry["highest_confidence"] = "critical" corroborated.append(entry) print(f"[CORROBORATED] {filename} - USN Journal confirms " f"BASIC_INFO_CHANGE at {usn_matches['UpdateTimestamp'].iloc[0]}") return corroborated # Parse USN Journal (use MFTECmd or ANJP) # MFTECmd.exe -f "$J" --csv D:\Evidence\Parsed\ --csvf usn_parsed.csv
pythondef check_shimcache_timeline(stomped_files, shimcache_csv): """Validate timestamps against ShimCache (AppCompatCache) entries. ShimCache records the last modification time of executables independently of NTFS timestamps, providing another corroboration point. """ shim_df = pd.read_csv(shimcache_csv, low_memory=False) shim_df["LastModifiedTimeUTC"] = pd.to_datetime( shim_df["LastModifiedTimeUTC"], errors="coerce" ) for entry in stomped_files: filepath = entry["file_path"] shim_match = shim_df[ shim_df["Path"].str.lower() == filepath.lower() ] if not shim_match.empty: shim_time = shim_match["LastModifiedTimeUTC"].iloc[0] si_modified = pd.to_datetime(entry.get("si_created")) if pd.notna(shim_time) and pd.notna(si_modified): delta = abs((shim_time - si_modified).days) if delta > 30: entry["shimcache_mismatch"] = True entry["shimcache_time"] = str(shim_time) print(f"[SHIMCACHE MISMATCH] {filepath}") print(f" SI timestamp: {si_modified}") print(f" ShimCache timestamp: {shim_time}") print(f" Delta: {delta} days") return stomped_files
pythonimport json def generate_report(stomped_files, output_path): """Generate a structured JSON report of all timestomping detections.""" report = { "report_title": "Timestomping Detection Analysis", "generated_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z", "mitre_technique": "T1070.006 - Indicator Removal: Timestomp", "total_suspicious_files": len(stomped_files), "critical_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "critical"]), "high_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "high"]), "medium_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "medium"]), "findings": stomped_files, } with open(output_path, "w") as f: json.dump(report, f, indent=2, default=str) print(f"Report written to {output_path}") print(f" Critical: {report['critical_findings']}") print(f" High: {report['high_findings']}") print(f" Medium: {report['medium_findings']}") generate_report(stomped_files, "D:\\Evidence\\timestomping_report.json")
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.