Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Implement Cloud Security Posture Management using AWS Security Hub, Azure Defender for Cloud, and open-source tools like Prowler and ScoutSuite for multi-cloud vulnerability detection.
.claude/skills/implementing-cloud-vulnerability-posture-management/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) continuously monitors cloud infrastructure for misconfigurations, compliance violations, and security risks. Unlike traditional vulnerability scanning, CSPM focuses on cloud-native risks: IAM over-permissions, exposed storage buckets, unencrypted data, missing network controls, and service misconfigurations. This skill covers multi-cloud CSPM using AWS Security Hub, Azure Defender for Cloud, and open-source tools like Prowler and ScoutSuite.
boto3, azure-identity, azure-mgmt-securitybash# Enable AWS Security Hub with default standards aws securityhub enable-security-hub \ --enable-default-standards \ --region us-east-1 # Enable specific standards aws securityhub batch-enable-standards \ --standards-subscription-requests \ '{"StandardsArn":"arn:aws:securityhub:us-east-1::standards/aws-foundational-security-best-practices/v/1.0.0"}' \ '{"StandardsArn":"arn:aws:securityhub:us-east-1::standards/cis-aws-foundations-benchmark/v/1.4.0"}' # Get findings summary aws securityhub get-findings \ --filters '{"SeverityLabel":[{"Value":"CRITICAL","Comparison":"EQUALS"}],"RecordState":[{"Value":"ACTIVE","Comparison":"EQUALS"}]}' \ --max-items 10
| Standard | Description | |----------|------------| | AWS Foundational Security Best Practices | AWS-recommended baseline controls | | CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark 1.4 | CIS hardening requirements | | PCI DSS v3.2.1 | Payment card industry controls | | NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 | Federal security controls |
bash# Enable Defender for Cloud free tier az security pricing create \ --name CloudPosture \ --tier standard # Check secure score az security secure-score list \ --query "[].{Name:displayName,Score:current,Max:max}" \ --output table # Get security recommendations az security assessment list \ --query "[?status.code=='Unhealthy'].{Name:displayName,Severity:metadata.severity,Resource:resourceDetails.id}" \ --output table # Get alerts az security alert list \ --query "[?status=='Active'].{Name:alertDisplayName,Severity:severity,Time:timeGeneratedUtc}" \ --output table
bash# Install Prowler pip install prowler # Run full AWS scan prowler aws --output-formats json-ocsf,csv,html # Run specific checks prowler aws --checks s3_bucket_public_access iam_root_mfa_enabled ec2_sg_open_to_internet # Run against specific AWS profile and region prowler aws --profile production --region us-east-1 --output-formats json-ocsf # Run CIS Benchmark compliance check prowler aws --compliance cis_1.5_aws # Run PCI DSS compliance prowler aws --compliance pci_3.2.1_aws # Scan Azure environment prowler azure --subscription-ids "sub-id-here" # Scan GCP environment prowler gcp --project-ids "project-id-here"
| Category | Examples | |----------|---------| | IAM | Root MFA, password policy, access key rotation | | S3 | Public access, encryption, versioning | | EC2 | Security groups, EBS encryption, metadata service | | RDS | Public access, encryption, backup retention | | CloudTrail | Enabled, encrypted, log validation | | VPC | Flow logs, default SG restrictions | | Lambda | Public access, runtime versions | | EKS | Public endpoint, secrets encryption |
bash# Install ScoutSuite pip install scoutsuite # Run AWS assessment scout aws --profile production # Run Azure assessment scout azure --cli # Run GCP assessment scout gcp --project-id my-project # Results available as interactive HTML report # Open scout-report/report.html in browser
pythonimport json import subprocess from datetime import datetime, timezone def run_prowler_scan(provider, output_dir, compliance=None): """Run Prowler scan for a cloud provider.""" cmd = ["prowler", provider, "--output-formats", "json-ocsf", "--output-directory", output_dir] if compliance: cmd.extend(["--compliance", compliance]) result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=3600) return result.returncode == 0 def aggregate_findings(prowler_dirs): """Aggregate findings from multiple Prowler scans.""" all_findings = [] for scan_dir in prowler_dirs: json_files = list(Path(scan_dir).glob("*.json")) for jf in json_files: with open(jf, "r") as f: for line in f: try: finding = json.loads(line.strip()) all_findings.append(finding) except json.JSONDecodeError: continue # Sort by severity severity_order = {"critical": 0, "high": 1, "medium": 2, "low": 3, "informational": 4} all_findings.sort(key=lambda f: severity_order.get( f.get("severity", "informational").lower(), 5 )) return all_findings def generate_posture_report(findings, output_path): """Generate cloud security posture report.""" report = { "generated_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(), "total_findings": len(findings), "by_severity": {}, "by_provider": {}, "by_service": {}, } for f in findings: sev = f.get("severity", "unknown") provider = f.get("cloud_provider", "unknown") service = f.get("service_name", "unknown") report["by_severity"][sev] = report["by_severity"].get(sev, 0) + 1 report["by_provider"][provider] = report["by_provider"].get(provider, 0) + 1 report["by_service"][service] = report["by_service"].get(service, 0) + 1 with open(output_path, "w") as f: json.dump(report, f, indent=2) return report
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.