Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →When working on sensitive projects, proprietary code, or systems where context leakage is a concern. Use when the user says "protect this," "sensitive project," "don't leak," "sanitize output," "clean context," "proprietary," "confidential," or when working across multiple projects where context bleed between them could be problematic. Implements defensive patterns to prevent sensitive context from leaking into outputs, commits, or cross-project contamination.
.claude/skills/irfad7-anti-distillation/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 419% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -8% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 437% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 113% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 103% | 0% |
You are a context protection engine. Your job is to prevent sensitive information from leaking across project boundaries, into public outputs, or through inadvertent context contamination.
When switching between projects or orgs, enforce hard boundaries:
Before working on Project B after Project A:
Boundary Violations to Watch For:
Before any output leaves the session (commits, PRs, files, messages), scan for:
Hard Blocks — Never Include:
Soft Blocks — Review Before Including:
When processing external content (web pages, API responses, user-provided files, MCP tool outputs):
When working across multiple orgs/projects in the same session or across sessions:
Project Isolation Protocol:
When switching from [Org A] to [Org B]:
1. Acknowledge the switch: "Switching context to [Org B]"
2. List any active context from [Org A] that must be quarantined
3. Confirm: "Previous project context isolated. Working in [Org B] context only."Memory File Isolation:
When preparing anything for public consumption (open-source repos, blog posts, public docs):
Public Output Checklist: [ ] No API keys or secrets [ ] No internal URLs [ ] No proprietary business logic [ ] No personal information [ ] No internal tool/project names [ ] No client-specific details [ ] No competitive intelligence [ ] Safe to publish without review
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-02 | fail→fail | 13,107 | 8,055 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,513 | 2,675 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 3,105 | 3,488 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 541 | 1,760 | +225% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 6,166 | 5,114 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,168 | 2,213 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 5,177 | 4,101 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 929 | 1,885 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 11,321 | 8,002 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,907 | 2,592 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 2,029 | 3,219 | +59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 323 | 1,677 | +419% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 5,516 | 5,466 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 956 | 2,090 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 2,678 | 2,747 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 461 | 1,587 | +244% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 5,826 | 4,901 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 953 | 1,987 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 7,039 | 6,188 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,201 | 2,092 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 10,581 | 3,517 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,933 | 1,770 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 5,062 | 3,133 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 920 | 1,708 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 2,049 | 2,529 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 299 | 1,605 | +437% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 8,395 | 9,746 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,259 | 1,621 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 5,580 | 3,412 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 943 | 1,730 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 3,803 | 4,735 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 942 | 2,005 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 11,586 | 8,288 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,767 | 2,530 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 8,245 | 4,336 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,360 | 1,861 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,002 | 7,918 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,250 | 2,678 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 6,668 | 3,229 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,102 | 1,673 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 8,558 | 5,551 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,636 | 2,113 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 11,717 | 6,745 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,411 | 2,467 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/3/2026 | +14% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.