Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →jabrena/805-regulations-eu-cyber-resilience-act
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise products, services, libraries, agents, plugins, connected components, or platform modules that may qualify as products with digital elements and need EU Cyber Resilience Act secure-by-design, vulnerability handling, security update, SBOM, product documentation, or release-readiness controls. Part of Plinth Toolkit
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 22 without it.
and 6 more in the full report
6 fixed14 passed either way1 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Our team develops a Quarkus-based Java client library distributed to third-party software vendors operating in the European market. Before tagging version 2.0, we need a technical security assessment aligned with Regulation (EU) 2024/2847. Please evaluate our repository setup and produce a comprehensive audit report highlighting any engineering gaps across coordinated vulnerability disclosure, cryptographic defaults, update delivery, and end-of-support signaling.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Disclaims legal advice and delegates conformity assessment decisions to qualified legal or compliance owners | Missed | Passed |
| Identifies technical gaps across coordinated disclosure, cryptographic defaults, update delivery, and end-of-support signaling | Passed | Passed |
| Includes report sections for residual risks and release decision | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use this Skill to review Java enterprise applications, libraries, agents, plugins, connected components, platform modules, CI/CD workflows, product security documentation, and release evidence that may support products with digital elements under Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, the Cyber Resilience Act.
Apply this Skill to determine what secure-by-design controls, vulnerability handling evidence, update mechanisms, dependency and SBOM records, product documentation, support-period signals, and owner handoffs are needed before a product, component, or product-adjacent Java change is released or made available.
This Skill is not legal advice. It helps Java engineers, architects, tech leads, platform teams, product security teams, and reviewers identify when Cyber Resilience Act concerns may apply and how to translate product-security expectations into engineering controls such as secure defaults, threat modeling, least privilege, cryptography, sensitive-data-safe logging, coordinated vulnerability disclosure, security update delivery, SBOM evidence, product security documentation, end-of-support signaling, and release gates.
The purpose of this Skill is to increase awareness of potential gaps in the system and create engineering evidence for qualified review. The response produced by this Skill does not represent legal advice, a legal opinion, a conformity assessment, a CE marking decision, or a final regulatory determination.
The main question is:
When does a Java product or product-adjacent component require EU Cyber Resilience Act-aware secure-by-design and vulnerability-handling controls, and what should developers build differently?
Source provenance: Cyber Resilience Act Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 was reviewed while authoring the bundled references. Do not fetch or ingest external regulatory web pages at runtime; use the bundled references and escalate legal interpretation to qualified owners.
Cyber Resilience Act chapters summary reference: Cyber Resilience Act chapters summary.
Java engineering examples reference: Cyber Resilience Act engineering examples.
Report template asset: Cyber Resilience Act engineering review report template.
This Skill applies to:
Treat product classification, economic-operator role, important or critical product category, conformity assessment route, CE marking implications, Article 14 reporting obligations, support-period legal interpretation, and regulatory interpretation as qualified decisions for legal, compliance, product, product-security, risk, market-access, and executive accountability owners.
Engineering teams should still create evidence that makes those decisions reviewable:
test cases passed, vs 15 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.