Contract Review — Multi-Agent Orchestrator

Flagship contract review skill that spawns five parallel analysis agents, then aggregates their findings into a single executive report with a Contract Safety Score. Designed for founders, freelancers, and small-business operators who need to understand what they are signing without retaining outside counsel for every agreement.

Overview

Most contracts arrive as walls of dense legalese. A single-pass review misses nuance. This skill mirrors how a law firm reviews contracts: multiple specialists work in parallel, each with a different lens, then a senior partner synthesizes everything into a recommendation.

The orchestrator:

1. Ingests the contract (file path or pasted text).
2. Classifies the contract type and extracts metadata.
3. Launches five parallel agents (risk, plain-English, missing protections,

compliance, and party-balance analysis).

1. Aggregates results into a unified report with a 0-100 Contract Safety Score.

Prerequisites

• The contract must be provided as a file path to a readable document (PDF,

DOCX, TXT, MD) or pasted directly into the conversation.

• For file-based input the file must exist and be accessible via the Read tool.
• No external APIs or network access are required.

Instructions

1. Ingest the contract.

• If a file path is provided, read the full document with the Read tool.
• If the text is pasted, capture it verbatim.
• Confirm the document length; warn if it exceeds 50 pages.

1. Classify the contract.

Determine the contract type from one of the following categories:

• Employment Agreement
• Independent Contractor / Freelance Agreement
• Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
• Master Services Agreement (MSA)
• Software License / SaaS Agreement
• Terms of Service / Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy / Data Processing Agreement
• Partnership / Joint Venture Agreement
• Lease / Real Estate Agreement
• Other (describe)

1. Extract metadata.

Capture: parties, effective date, term/duration, governing law, dispute resolution mechanism, total contract value (if stated).

1. Launch five parallel agents using the Task tool.

Each agent receives the full contract text and returns structured findings.

| Agent | Focus | Key Deliverable | |-------|-------|-----------------| | Risk Analyst | Clause-by-clause risk scoring across 10 categories | Risk heat map, poison pill flags | | Plain-English Translator | 8th-grade reading level rewrite | Clause-by-clause translation with flags | | Protection Auditor | Gap analysis against type-specific checklists | Missing protections with urgency ratings | | Compliance Checker | Regulatory alignment (GDPR, CCPA, labor law basics) | Compliance findings table | | Party-Balance Analyst | Fairness tilt between the parties | Asymmetry flags, one-sided clause list |

1. Aggregate results.

Combine all five agent reports into a unified document with these sections:

• Executive Summary (3-5 bullet points)
• Contract Metadata table
• Contract Safety Score (0-100) with letter grade
• Risk Heat Map (top 5 risks ranked by severity)
• Plain-English Quick Reference (critical clauses only)
• Missing Protections (critical and important only)
• Compliance Findings
• Party-Balance Assessment
• Recommended Next Steps (negotiate, accept, reject, consult attorney)

1. Compute the Contract Safety Score.

Weighted formula:

| Component | Weight | Source Agent | |-----------|--------|-------------| | Risk severity (inverse) | 30% | Risk Analyst | | Protection coverage | 25% | Protection Auditor | | Party balance | 20% | Party-Balance Analyst | | Compliance alignment | 15% | Compliance Checker | | Language clarity | 10% | Plain-English Translator |

Letter grades: A (90-100), B (80-89), C (70-79), D (60-69), F (< 60).

1. Present the final report in the conversation and note the output

filename.

Output

Filename: CONTRACT-REVIEW-{party-or-title}-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md

The report uses Markdown with tables and follows this structure:

# Contract Review Report
## Executive Summary
## Contract Metadata
## Contract Safety Score: [score]/100 ([grade])
## Risk Heat Map
## Plain-English Quick Reference
## Missing Protections
## Compliance Findings
## Party-Balance Assessment
## Recommended Next Steps
## Disclaimer

Error Handling

| Failure Mode | Cause | Resolution | |--------------|-------|------------| | File not found | Path is incorrect or file missing | Ask the user to confirm the file path | | Unreadable format | Binary or encrypted document | Ask for a plain-text or PDF version | | Document too long | Exceeds context window | Summarize by section; warn about truncation | | Agent timeout | One parallel agent fails to return | Report partial results; note which agent failed | | Ambiguous contract type | Cannot classify confidently | Ask the user to confirm the contract type |

Examples

Example 1 — File-based review:

> User: Review the contract at ~/contracts/acme-msa-2026.pdf

The orchestrator reads the file, classifies it as a Master Services Agreement, launches five agents, and produces a report:

Contract Safety Score: 72/100 (C)
Top Risk: Unlimited indemnification liability (Section 8.2)
Missing: No force majeure clause, no data breach notification timeline
Balance: Tilts 65/35 in favor of Acme Corp
Recommendation: Negotiate Sections 8.2 and 12.1 before signing

Example 2 — Pasted text:

> User: Review this contract: pasted NDA text]

The orchestrator classifies it as a Mutual NDA, flags a unilateral non-solicitation clause hidden in the definitions, and scores it 58/100 (F).

Resources

• CommonPaper Standard Contracts — Open-source

contract templates (CC BY 4.0) used as comparison baselines.

• American Bar Association Model Contract Clauses

— Authoritative clause language references.

• Restatement (Second) of Contracts — American Law

Institute's foundational contract law principles.

• GDPR Full Text — EU data protection regulation.
• CCPA Full Text — California Consumer

Privacy Act via the CA Attorney General.

Legal Disclaimer: This skill provides AI-generated analysis for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, create an attorney-client relationship, or substitute for consultation with a qualified attorney. Contract interpretation depends on jurisdiction, context, and specific facts that an AI cannot fully evaluate. Always consult a licensed attorney before making legal decisions based on this analysis.