Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Set up GPU monitoring and observability for CoreWeave workloads. Use when implementing GPU metrics dashboards, configuring alerts, or tracking inference latency and throughput. Trigger with phrases like "coreweave monitoring", "coreweave observability", "coreweave gpu metrics", "coreweave grafana".
.claude/skills/jeremylongshore-coreweave-observability/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 9% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -17% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -40% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 23% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 36% | 0% |
> Community-contributed. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by CoreWeave, Inc. CoreWeave is a registered trademark of CoreWeave, Inc.
CoreWeave runs GPU-intensive workloads on Kubernetes where hardware failures, memory exhaustion, and underutilization directly impact cost and reliability. Observability must cover DCGM GPU metrics, Kubernetes pod health, inference latency, and job completion rates. Proactive monitoring prevents wasted spend on idle GPUs and catches OOM conditions before they cascade.
| Metric | Type | Target | Alert Threshold | |--------|------|--------|-----------------| | GPU utilization | Gauge | > 60% | < 20% for 30m | | GPU memory usage | Gauge | < 85% | > 95% for 5m | | Inference latency p99 | Histogram | < 200ms | > 500ms | | Job completion rate | Counter | > 99% | < 95% per hour | | Pod restart count | Counter | 0 | > 3 in 15m | | Node GPU temperature | Gauge | < 80C | > 85C for 10m |
typescriptasync function trackInference(model: string, fn: () => Promise<any>) { const start = Date.now(); try { const result = await fn(); metrics.record('coreweave.inference.latency', Date.now() - start, { model, status: 'ok' }); metrics.increment('coreweave.inference.completed', { model }); return result; } catch (err) { metrics.increment('coreweave.inference.errors', { model, error: err.code }); throw err; } }
typescriptasync function coreweaveHealth(): Promise<Record<string, string>> { const gpu = await queryPrometheus('avg(DCGM_FI_DEV_GPU_UTIL)'); const mem = await queryPrometheus('avg(DCGM_FI_DEV_FB_USED/(DCGM_FI_DEV_FB_USED+DCGM_FI_DEV_FB_FREE))'); const pods = await queryPrometheus('kube_deployment_status_replicas_available{namespace="inference"}'); return { gpu_utilization: gpu > 20 ? 'healthy' : 'underutilized', gpu_memory: mem < 0.9 ? 'healthy' : 'critical', inference_pods: pods > 0 ? 'healthy' : 'down', }; }
typescriptconst alerts = [ { metric: 'DCGM_FI_DEV_GPU_UTIL', condition: 'avg < 20', window: '30m', severity: 'warning' }, { metric: 'gpu_memory_pct', condition: '> 0.95', window: '5m', severity: 'critical' }, { metric: 'inference_latency_p99', condition: '> 500ms', window: '10m', severity: 'warning' }, { metric: 'pod_restart_count', condition: '> 3', window: '15m', severity: 'critical' }, ];
typescriptfunction logGpuEvent(event: string, node: string, data: Record<string, any>) { console.log(JSON.stringify({ service: 'coreweave', event, node, gpu_model: data.gpu_model, utilization: data.util, memory_pct: data.memPct, temperature: data.temp, timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), })); }
| Signal | Meaning | Action | |--------|---------|--------| | GPU util < 20% sustained | Idle GPUs burning cost | Scale down or reassign workload | | GPU memory > 95% | OOM imminent | Reduce batch size or add nodes | | Pod CrashLoopBackOff | Driver or config failure | Check DCGM logs, restart node | | Inference latency spike | Contention or throttling | Review GPU temp and queue depth | | Node NotReady | Hardware or network issue | Cordon node, migrate pods |
For incident response, see coreweave-incident-runbook.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 10,982 | 8,450 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,188 | 2,965 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 17,385 | 12,693 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,543 | 3,859 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 17,937 | 10,601 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,081 | 3,508 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,341 | 5,858 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,770 | 1,949 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 5,022 | 4,597 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 962 | 1,972 | +105% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 13,049 | 8,232 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,442 | 2,618 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 11,496 | 2,017 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,890 | 1,334 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 9,418 | 1,500 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,490 | 1,240 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 9,269 | 4,901 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,734 | 2,024 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 12,941 | 1,930 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,128 | 1,281 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,078 | 4,744 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,219 | 1,855 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 9,401 | 3,371 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,562 | 1,584 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 16,478 | 14,661 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,908 | 3,584 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 18,721 | 8,117 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,110 | 2,445 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 6,759 | 1,915 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 942 | 1,280 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 12,213 | 2,352 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,193 | 1,407 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 5,672 | 2,370 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,037 | 1,418 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 7,480 | 3,172 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,492 | 1,363 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 11,383 | 1,741 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,809 | 1,252 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 8,445 | 1,452 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,407 | 1,275 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 9,908 | 2,119 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,899 | 1,390 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 9,224 | 1,723 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,495 | 1,241 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.