Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Optimize Linear API queries, caching, and batching for performance. Use when improving response times, reducing API calls, or implementing caching strategies for Linear data. Trigger: "linear performance", "optimize linear", "linear caching", "linear slow queries", "speed up linear", "linear N+1".
.claude/skills/jeremylongshore-linear-performance-tuning/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 37% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 41% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 23% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 61% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 121% | 0% |
Optimize Linear API usage for minimal latency and efficient resource consumption. The three main levers are: (1) query flattening to avoid N+1 and reduce complexity, (2) caching static data with webhook-driven invalidation, and (3) batching mutations into single GraphQL requests.
Key numbers:
firstupdatedAt to get fresh data first@linear/sdkThe SDK lazy-loads relations. Accessing .assignee on 50 issues makes 50 separate API calls.
typescriptimport { LinearClient } from "@linear/sdk"; const client = new LinearClient({ apiKey: process.env.LINEAR_API_KEY! }); // BAD: N+1 — 1 query for issues + 50 for assignees + 50 for states = 101 requests const issues = await client.issues({ first: 50 }); for (const i of issues.nodes) { const assignee = await i.assignee; // API call! const state = await i.state; // API call! console.log(`${i.identifier}: ${assignee?.name} [${state?.name}]`); } // GOOD: 1 request — use rawRequest with exact field selection const response = await client.client.rawRequest(` query TeamDashboard($teamId: String!) { team(id: $teamId) { issues(first: 50, orderBy: updatedAt) { nodes { id identifier title priority estimate updatedAt assignee { name email } state { name type } labels { nodes { name color } } project { name } } pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor } } } } `, { teamId: "team-uuid" }); // Complexity: ~50 * (10 fields * 0.1 + 4 objects) = ~275 pts
Teams, workflow states, and labels change rarely. Cache them with appropriate TTLs.
typescriptinterface CacheEntry<T> { data: T; expiresAt: number; } class LinearCache { private store = new Map<string, CacheEntry<any>>(); get<T>(key: string): T | null { const entry = this.store.get(key); if (!entry || Date.now() > entry.expiresAt) { this.store.delete(key); return null; } return entry.data; } set<T>(key: string, data: T, ttlSeconds: number): void { this.store.set(key, { data, expiresAt: Date.now() + ttlSeconds * 1000 }); } invalidate(key: string): void { this.store.delete(key); } } const cache = new LinearCache(); // Teams: 10 minute TTL (almost never change) async function getTeams(client: LinearClient) { const cached = cache.get<any[]>("teams"); if (cached) return cached; const teams = await client.teams(); cache.set("teams", teams.nodes, 600); return teams.nodes; } // Workflow states: 30 minute TTL (rarely change) async function getStates(client: LinearClient, teamId: string) { const key = `states:${teamId}`; const cached = cache.get<any[]>(key); if (cached) return cached; const team = await client.team(teamId); const states = await team.states(); cache.set(key, states.nodes, 1800); return states.nodes; } // Labels: 10 minute TTL async function getLabels(client: LinearClient) { const cached = cache.get<any[]>("labels"); if (cached) return cached; const labels = await client.issueLabels(); cache.set("labels", labels.nodes, 600); return labels.nodes; }
Replace polling with webhooks. Invalidate cache when relevant entities change.
typescriptfunction handleCacheInvalidation(event: { type: string; action: string; data: any }) { switch (event.type) { case "Issue": cache.invalidate(`issue:${event.data.id}`); break; case "WorkflowState": cache.invalidate(`states:${event.data.teamId}`); break; case "IssueLabel": cache.invalidate("labels"); break; case "Team": cache.invalidate("teams"); break; } }
Combine multiple mutations into one GraphQL request.
typescript// Instead of 100 separate updateIssue calls: async function batchUpdatePriority( client: LinearClient, issueUpdates: Array<{ id: string; priority: number }> ) { const chunkSize = 20; // Keep complexity manageable for (let i = 0; i < issueUpdates.length; i += chunkSize) { const chunk = issueUpdates.slice(i, i + chunkSize); const mutations = chunk.map((u, j) => `u${j}: issueUpdate(id: "${u.id}", input: { priority: ${u.priority} }) { success }` ).join("\n"); await client.client.rawRequest(`mutation { ${mutations} }`); } } // Batch issue creation async function batchCreate( client: LinearClient, teamId: string, issues: Array<{ title: string; priority?: number }> ) { const mutations = issues.map((issue, i) => `c${i}: issueCreate(input: { teamId: "${teamId}", title: "${issue.title.replace(/"/g, '\\"')}", priority: ${issue.priority ?? 3} }) { success issue { id identifier } }` ).join("\n"); return client.client.rawRequest(`mutation { ${mutations} }`); }
typescript// Stream all issues without loading everything into memory async function* paginateIssues( client: LinearClient, teamId: string, pageSize = 50 ) { let cursor: string | undefined; let hasNext = true; while (hasNext) { const result = await client.issues({ first: pageSize, after: cursor, filter: { team: { id: { eq: teamId } } }, orderBy: "updatedAt", // Fresh data first }); yield result.nodes; hasNext = result.pageInfo.hasNextPage; cursor = result.pageInfo.endCursor; } } // Process in batches for await (const batch of paginateIssues(client, "team-uuid")) { console.log(`Processing ${batch.length} issues`); } // Incremental sync: only fetch issues updated since last sync const lastSync = "2026-03-20T00:00:00Z"; const updated = await client.issues({ first: 100, filter: { updatedAt: { gte: lastSync } }, orderBy: "updatedAt", });
Deduplicate concurrent identical requests.
typescriptconst inflight = new Map<string, Promise<any>>(); async function coalesce<T>(key: string, fn: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> { if (inflight.has(key)) return inflight.get(key)!; const promise = fn().finally(() => inflight.delete(key)); inflight.set(key, promise); return promise; } // Multiple components requesting same team data simultaneously = 1 API call const team = await coalesce("team:ENG", () => client.teams({ filter: { key: { eq: "ENG" } } }).then(r => r.nodes[0]) );
| Error | Cause | Solution | |-------|-------|----------| | Query complexity too high | Deep nesting + large first | Use rawRequest() with flat fields, first: 50 | | HTTP 429 | Burst exceeding rate budget | Add request queue with 100ms spacing | | Stale cache | TTL too long | Shorten TTL or use webhook invalidation | | Timeout | Query spanning too many records | Paginate with first: 50 + cursor |
typescriptasync function benchmark(label: string, fn: () => Promise<any>) { const start = Date.now(); await fn(); console.log(`${label}: ${Date.now() - start}ms`); } await benchmark("Cold teams", () => client.teams()); await benchmark("Cached teams", () => getTeams(client)); await benchmark("50 issues (SDK)", () => client.issues({ first: 50 })); await benchmark("50 issues (raw)", () => client.client.rawRequest( `query { issues(first: 50) { nodes { id identifier title priority } } }` ));
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 25,078 | 24,622 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,925 | 5,366 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 24,900 | 17,796 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,922 | 4,275 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 23,320 | 17,989 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,376 | 4,754 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 23,395 | 13,211 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,891 | 3,824 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 33,140 | 23,737 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,097 | 5,042 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 23,103 | 14,018 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,509 | 4,048 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 17,154 | 15,959 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,956 | 4,000 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 34,048 | 24,884 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,636 | 5,420 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 14,090 | 15,633 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,366 | 3,977 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 16,280 | 21,240 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,933 | 4,712 | +144% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 27,069 | 17,075 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,079 | 4,878 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 15,371 | 16,994 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,045 | 4,518 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 21,285 | 11,665 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,226 | 4,369 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 12,853 | 14,721 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,649 | 4,056 | +146% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 20,306 | 8,822 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,227 | 3,921 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 20,958 | 17,544 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,916 | 4,932 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 13,129 | 9,244 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,306 | 3,035 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 18,513 | 8,527 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,407 | 4,057 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 14,856 | 13,429 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,824 | 3,943 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,632 | 15,197 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,626 | 4,258 | +62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 14,141 | 12,401 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,594 | 3,692 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 7,001 | 7,950 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,266 | 2,768 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 7,439 | 14,212 | +91% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,343 | 4,171 | +211% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.