Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →jnmetacode/incident-postmortem
Write a blameless, actionable incident postmortem from the raw facts. Use after an outage/incident, or when asked to write up "what happened" for the team.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
8 fixed12 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We just wrapped up our response to an incident where our primary database partition ran out of disk space during peak hours yesterday, causing read/write failures across the customer portal for about 45 minutes. Here are the raw notes from our response channel: 14:02 UTC alert fired for high disk usage, 14:10 DB went read-only, 14:25 devops identified unrotated audit logs filling the volume, 14:47 logs purged and service fully restored. Please assemble these notes into a complete incident postmortem document detailing the event, timeline, root cause, and follow-up action items.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The root cause uses a causal chain linked with explicit because statements ending at an underlying assumption. | Missed | Passed |
| The document includes a section explicitly addressing what went well or what got lucky. | Passed | Passed |
| Action items explicitly evaluate or test if each item would have helped on the documented timeline. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A postmortem exists to change the system, not to assign blame or to perform remorse. Optimize for the engineer two years from now who hits something similar at 3am.
# 2026-04-02 — Payments webhook outage (3h, 12 failed checkouts)
**Summary** (3 sentences: what broke, impact, fix)
**Timeline** (timestamped, detection → resolution)
**Root cause** (causal chain, ending at the broken assumption)
**What went well / what got lucky**
**Action items** (owner · due date · "would it have helped?")
test cases passed, vs 12 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.