Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Coordinate multiple agents by splitting work into research, synthesis, implementation, and verification, assigning ownership, and keeping the coordinator focused on integration rather than raw exploration.
.claude/skills/kentunderage549-swarm-coordinator/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -71% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -40% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -78% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -58% | 0% |
Use this skill when a task is large enough that one coordinator and several bounded workers are more reliable than one monolithic agent loop.
Generate a task-board skeleton:
bashpython3 {baseDir}/scripts/task_board.py --goal "Investigate flaky CI failure" --worker research --worker implementation --worker verification
Then use the coordinator prompt in references/prompt-template.md.
The coordinator should own planning, routing, and synthesis. Workers should own bounded execution.
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/task_board.py ...| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 44,973 | 3,667 | -92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,551 | 764 | -83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 12,940 | 8,252 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,397 | 1,824 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 16,542 | 7,465 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,036 | 715 | -76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 6,929 | 2,432 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,143 | 661 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 4,300 | 3,355 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 631 | 818 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 17,163 | 7,261 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,778 | 1,540 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 10,876 | 3,919 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,739 | 879 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 13,479 | 2,401 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,277 | 664 | -71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 9,022 | 3,994 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,423 | 1,006 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 8,107 | 3,458 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,394 | 835 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 11,266 | 1,150 | -90% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,833 | 411 | -78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 3,292 | 1,569 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 466 | 481 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,127 | 8,041 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,760 | 1,577 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 11,094 | 7,906 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,079 | 1,570 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 4,522 | 1,984 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 726 | 550 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 7,001 | 1,651 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,166 | 484 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 8,089 | 1,914 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,419 | 566 | -60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 9,522 | 2,176 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,606 | 623 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 5,047 | 3,037 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 868 | 771 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 13,161 | 7,346 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,071 | 1,369 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 7,347 | 2,096 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,245 | 637 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 15,929 | 7,053 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,668 | 1,323 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.