Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/legal-analysis-forge-oliver-schmidt-prietz
EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.
Passed 12 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 21 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
7 fixed6 passed either way9 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are deploying a new web tracking tool on our e-commerce platform. Please draft a Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) for our processing under GDPR Article 6(1)(f), including the necessity test and balancing test.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Declines to draft the operational Legitimate Interest Assessment and routes the user to a dedicated LIA compliance tool. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A prompt generator for structured legal analysis of EU digital regulation documents. The skill characterises a document, elicits the desired outcome and audience, and produces a tailored expert prompt. It optionally runs the prompt in-session and supports refinement.
Invoke when the user:
Do not invoke when:
EU digital regulation only. Covers: GDPR, AI Act, Data Act, DGA, DSA, DMA, NIS2 (and Member State implementations including BSIG-neu), ePrivacy, CRA, DORA, eIDAS 2.0, PLD (Dir. 2024/2853), AI Liability Directive (when adopted), and adjacent secondary instruments (delegated acts, implementing acts, harmonised standards under Art. 40 AI Act and equivalents, codes of conduct under Art. 40 GDPR / Art. 56 AI Act / Art. 45 DSA). Out of scope: competition, IP, tax, employment, sectoral law not touching the digital stack.
Six steps. Steps 5 (Execute) and 6 (Refine) are optional and skipped where not needed. Skip elicitation where the answer is clear from the conversation; the goal is the minimum number of questions consistent with a precise prompt.
Read the document. Sources:
pdf-processing-anthropic skill if the file is not already in contextWebFetch; if the URL is an EUR-Lex page, prefer the CELEX-linked HTMLIf the document is long, read at minimum: title, recitals, all substantive articles, annexes referenced in the substantive provisions, final provisions (entry into force, transitional, review), and any disclaimers limiting scope.
Freshness check (automatic for drafts and consultation documents): where the document is a draft, a public consultation version, a Commission proposal, or any text labelled as preliminary, run a freshness check against authoritative sources (see Live research protocol below) before proceeding. The user may have provided a superseded version. If a finalised or later version exists, surface it and ask: "Proceed with the version you provided, the later version, or both?" Do not silently substitute documents.
test cases passed, vs 6 / 21 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.