Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →分析 Android 项目源码,用 LLM 从多维度生成 AI 自动化测试所需的先验知识文档,打包上报测试平台。核心价值:让 AI 测试 Agent 在运行前就知道「测什么、怎么断言、有哪些陷阱」。触发词:「分析我的 Android 项目」「生成测试画像」「理解这个 App 的业务」「提取测试先验知识」「帮我分析 Android 源码」
.claude/skills/leoyeai-android-static-analyzer/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 159% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 161% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 157% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 253% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 196% | 0% |
AI 自动化测试要能"智能地"测试 App,需要知道以下 5 件事:
本 Skill 从源码中提取上述所有信息,生成 9 份文档,打包成 static-profile。
与 AITestSDK 分工:
绝不重复 AITestSDK 已有的结构数据(Activity 数量、控件 ID 枚举等)。
询问用户项目路径。也接受:APK、GitHub 链接、直接粘贴的代码。
bash# 定位项目 find <path> -name "AndroidManifest.xml" -not -path "*/build/*" | head -3 find <path> -name "*Activity*.kt" -not -path "*/build/*" find <path> -name "README*" -maxdepth 3 -not -path "*/build/*" find <path> -name "build.gradle.kts" -not -path "*/build/*" | head -2
按优先级 read 每个文件前 300 行(优先读 Activity 源文件)。
读取时重点关注:
startActivity() / navigate() → 页面跳转Toast.makeText() 的文本 → 操作反馈(成功/失败提示)if/else + return → 约束条件和阻断逻辑isEnabled / isVisible / visibility = View.GONE/VISIBLE → UI 状态变化FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP → 清栈跳转(影响回退路径)拿到源码后,逐个生成以下文档。每份文档聚焦一个维度,独立分析。
分析维度:
- App 属于什么业务领域
- 核心功能模块有哪些
- 哪些功能已实现 vs 暂未开放(仅 Toast)
- 技术栈(从 build.gradle 推断导航框架/网络库/DI 框架)
输出 JSON:
{
"businessType": "移动电商/工具/社交/...",
"summary": "一句话描述这个 App 是干什么的",
"modules": ["模块名: 功能描述"],
"unimplemented": ["功能名: 现状描述(如:点击仅弹Toast)"],
"techStack": {
"navigation": "startActivity / Jetpack Navigation",
"network": "Retrofit / 无网络",
"di": "Hilt / 无"
}
}分析维度:
- 用户从 Launcher Activity 开始的所有完整路径
- 每条路径的触发方式和前置条件
- 每个步骤的关键控件 ID
- 路径的终点和预期状态
- 是否存在快捷路径(绕过正常流程)
输出 JSON:
{
"journeys": [
{
"name": "流程名(如:核心购买流程)",
"priority": "P0必测/P1重要/P2可选",
"steps": [
{
"step": 1,
"page": "LoginFlowActivity",
"action": "输入用户名和密码,点击登录",
"keyControls": ["et_username", "et_password", "btn_login"],
"waitCondition": "等待页面跳转或 Toast 出现"
}
],
"preconditions": ["前置状态:App 处于未登录状态"],
"expectedFinalState": "页面跳转至 HomeFlowActivity"
}
]
}这是最关键的文档。 AI 测试 Agent 需要知道每个操作后如何判断成功或失败。
分析维度:
- 每个关键操作后,UI 应该发生什么变化?
- 成功时:跳转到哪个页面 / 出现什么 Toast 文本 / 哪个控件变化
- 失败时:停在哪个页面 / 出现什么错误提示
- 操作后需要等待多久才能断言(同步/异步)
输出 JSON:
{
"assertions": [
{
"scenario": "场景描述(如:空账号点登录)",
"page": "LoginFlowActivity",
"trigger": "btn_login",
"successCondition": {
"type": "pageSwitch / toast / controlChange",
"target": "跳转到 HomeFlowActivity",
"detail": "Activity 变为 HomeFlowActivity"
},
"failureCondition": {
"type": "toast",
"target": "Toast 文本包含「请输入手机号/邮箱」",
"detail": "页面停留在 LoginFlowActivity"
},
"waitMs": 500,
"note": "登录是同步操作,无需长等待"
},
{
"scenario": "功能B前置条件未满足时触发操作",
"page": "<TargetActivity>",
"trigger": "<action_button>",
"successCondition": {
"type": "pageSwitch",
"target": "跳转到 PageB"
},
"failureCondition": {
"type": "toast",
"target": "Toast 文本包含「请满足前置条件」"
},
"note": "前置条件:<checkbox_id> 等必要条件未满足时,操作应被阻断"
}
]
}分析维度:
- 哪些功能需要 App 处于特定状态才能访问?
- 功能间的依赖关系(如:必须先登录才能访问核心功能)
- 操作会如何改变状态(如:核心操作完成后页面状态重置)
- 状态的持久化方式(内存 vs SharedPreferences vs 数据库)
输出 JSON:
{
"stateDependencies": [
{
"feature": "进入功能模块B",
"requires": ["用户已完成登录流程"],
"howToReach": "从登录页完成登录后,进入 HomeFlowActivity 点击对应入口"
},
{
"feature": "触发核心操作",
"requires": ["已进入目标页面", "至少满足一项前置条件(如 <checkbox_id> 已勾选)"],
"howToReach": "进入 <TargetActivity>,满足前置条件后点击 <action_button>"
}
],
"stateChanges": [
{
"action": "核心操作完成",
"before": "已进入目标页面,操作前状态已满足",
"after": "清栈跳转回 HomeFlowActivity,页面状态未持久化(内存数据)",
"implication": "测试操作完成后,重新进入目标页面需要重新构造前置状态"
}
]
}分析维度:
- 数值边界:最小值、最大值、边界值±1
- 空值/非法输入:每个表单的验证规则
- 状态边界:某个功能恰好在满足/不满足条件时的行为
- 并发/重复操作:快速点击两次会怎样
输出 JSON:
{
"edgeCases": [
{
"scenario": "数值输入最小值(边界)",
"page": "PageA",
"setup": "<value_display_id> 当前为最小值",
"action": "点击减少数量按钮",
"expected": "数量保持最小值,出现 Toast「已达最小值」",
"testValue": "最小值时再减",
"assertType": "toast + noChange"
},
{
"scenario": "数值输入超上限(超界)",
"page": "PageA",
"setup": "<value_display_id> 当前为最大值",
"action": "点击增加数量按钮",
"expected": "数量保持最大值,出现 Toast「超出范围」",
"assertType": "toast + noChange"
},
{
"scenario": "输入框大小写敏感验证",
"page": "PageA",
"action": "输入框输入特殊值的小写形式,点击提交",
"expected": "Toast 提示「操作成功」(大小写不敏感)",
"assertType": "toast"
}
]
}分析维度:
- 死路:点了没跳转/只弹 Toast 的功能入口
- 不可逆操作:执行后会破坏测试状态
- 外部依赖:需要真实环境才能完成(支付/短信/网络)
- 危险操作:会删除数据、清空状态、影响其他测试
输出 JSON:
{
"deadEnds": [
{
"page": "LoginFlowActivity",
"control": "tv_register / tv_forgot",
"reason": "点击仅弹 Toast「功能暂未开放」,不跳转",
"action": "测试时直接跳过,不要点击"
}
],
"externalDependencies": [
{
"feature": "微信/支付宝登录",
"dependency": "需要手机安装对应 App 并已登录",
"testStrategy": "Demo 中直接跳转 HomeActivity,无真实鉴权,可测试"
}
],
"irreversibleActions": [
{
"action": "提交订单",
"consequence": "FLAG_ACTIVITY_CLEAR_TOP 清栈,返回首页,页面状态重置",
"recovery": "重新走加购流程"
}
],
"dangerous": []
}分析维度:
- 哪些是 P0(核心链路,必须通过才能上线)
- 哪些是 P1(重要功能,尽量覆盖)
- 哪些是 P2(边界/次要,有时间再测)
- 建议的测试执行顺序(考虑状态依赖)
- 每轮测试的最小集合(Smoke Test)
输出 JSON:
{
"smokeTest": ["最小可行测试集,5步内验证核心链路"],
"priorities": {
"P0": ["必测场景,任何一个失败都是 Blocker"],
"P1": ["重要场景"],
"P2": ["边界/次要场景"],
"skip": ["明确跳过的场景和原因"]
},
"suggestedOrder": [
{"step": 1, "action": "先完成登录,建立已登录状态"},
{"step": 2, "action": "走核心购买链路验证主流程"}
],
"riskAreas": ["容易漏测但很重要的场景"]
}分析维度:
- 有效数据(能触发成功路径的数据)
- 无效数据(能触发错误提示的数据)
- 边界数据(触发边界行为的数据)
- 硬编码的特殊值(校验码/魔法数字)
输出 JSON:
{
"validInputs": [{"field": "校验码", "values": ["CODE123"], "effect": "校验通过"}],
"invalidInputs": [{"field": "校验码", "values": ["WRONG"], "effect": "提示无效"}],
"boundaryValues": [
{"field": "数值型控件", "min": 1, "max": 10, "testValues": [0, 1, 10, 11]}
],
"enumOptions": {
"选项A": ["值1", "值2", "值3"]
},
"specialCases": ["空字符串", "超长输入", "特殊字符", "大小写变体"]
}这是最关键的文档,为 AI Agent 提供可直接执行的测试步骤,包含完整前置状态设置。
分析维度:
- 每个关键场景的完整操作序列(含前置状态设置)
- 边界值测试(最小值/最大值/非法值)
- 负向测试(应该失败的场景)
- 每个步骤后的验证点
输出 JSON:
{
"testCases": [
{
"id": "tc_001",
"name": "表单提交成功跳转(正向)",
"page": "PageA",
"priority": "P0",
"category": "happy_path",
"setup": [
{"action": "input", "target": "et_field1", "value": "有效值", "description": "填入有效数据"},
{"action": "input", "target": "et_field2", "value": "有效值", "description": "填入有效数据"}
],
"execute": {
"action": "tap",
"target": "btn_submit",
"description": "点击提交"
},
"verify": {
"type": "pageSwitch",
"expected": "跳转到 PageB",
"failSign": "停留在 PageA 或弹错误 Toast",
"isBug": "有效输入无法提交是 Bug"
},
"waitMs": 500
},
{
"id": "tc_002",
"name": "数值控件减少操作有效性验证(边界)",
"page": "PageA",
"priority": "P1",
"category": "boundary",
"setup": [
{"action": "readValue", "target": "tv_counter", "saveAs": "beforeVal", "description": "记录操作前的值"}
],
"execute": {
"action": "tap",
"target": "btn_minus",
"description": "点击减少按钮"
},
"verify": {
"type": "valueChange",
"readTarget": "tv_counter",
"compareWith": "beforeVal",
"expected": "值减少1",
"failSign": "值未变化(按钮无响应)",
"isBug": "减少按钮点击后值不变是 Bug"
},
"waitMs": 300
},
{
"id": "tc_003",
"name": "输入框大小写不敏感验证(负向)",
"page": "PageA",
"priority": "P1",
"category": "boundary",
"setup": [],
"execute": {
"action": "sequence",
"steps": [
{"action": "input", "target": "et_code", "value": "code123", "description": "输入小写形式"},
{"action": "tap", "target": "btn_apply", "description": "点击应用"}
]
},
"verify": {
"type": "toast",
"expected": "Toast含「操作成功」(大小写不敏感)",
"failSign": "Toast含「无效」或「格式错误」",
"isBug": "小写输入被拒绝而大写接受,说明存在大小写敏感 Bug"
},
"waitMs": 300
}
]
}基于 9 份文档,用自然语言写一段 300 字以内的总结,直接给 AI 测试 Agent 读:
这是一个【业务类型】的 App(包名:xxx)。
【核心流程】:从 XxxActivity 开始,依次经过...最终到达...。
关键步骤:①先完成前置条件(如登录)→ ②进入目标页面 → ③满足操作前置状态 → ④执行核心操作 → ⑤验证结果。
【断言要点】:
- 登录成功:页面跳转到 HomeFlowActivity,出现「登录成功」Toast
- 核心操作成功:页面跳转到目标页面,出现「操作成功」Toast
- 流程完成:操作成功后状态更新,视情况清栈返回上一页面
【必须注意】:
- 前置条件未满足时操作会被阻断(Toast提示),需先确认 <checkbox_id> 等必要条件
- 数值型控件有范围限制,超界有 Toast 提示但不改变数值
- 死路入口(如仅弹 Toast 的功能)不要点击,避免测试中断
【测试数据】:校验码等特殊值参见文档8;账号密码任意非空字符串均可登录(Demo 无真实验证)。
【测试顺序建议】:完成登录等前置状态 → 进入目标页面 → 执行核心操作 → 验证断言。
【关键测试用例】:①必填项为空提交被阻断②数值增减按钮操作有效③大小写不敏感校验④空状态下数值显示合理json{ "appPackage": "com.xxx", "appVersion": "x.x.x", "generatedAt": "ISO时间戳", "source": "android-static-analyzer-skill", "quickSummary": "...(上面的自然语言总结)", "docs": { "businessOverview": {}, "userJourneys": {}, "assertions": {}, "stateDependencies": {}, "edgeCases": {}, "trapsAndForbidden": {}, "testStrategy": {}, "testData": {}, "testCases": { "testCases": [] } } }
将 static-profile.json 保存到项目根目录:
bashecho '<json>' > <project_path>/static-profile.json
然后告诉用户:
<project_path>/static-profile.jsoncurl -X POST http://localhost:2601/api/v1/sdk/static-profile -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d @<project_path>/static-profile.json不要自动 POST 到平台,由用户手动导入。
生成完成后,对照检查:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,996 | 11,647 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,408 | 6,553 | +172% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 18,972 | 11,032 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,024 | 6,242 | +106% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 26,221 | 8,687 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,868 | 6,050 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 24,552 | 32,591 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,206 | 10,885 | +159% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 29,742 | 33,750 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,896 | 10,893 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 8,245 | 6,826 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,477 | 5,816 | +294% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 14,722 | 12,212 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,488 | 6,491 | +161% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 13,227 | 8,610 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,928 | 5,906 | +206% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 5,020 | 7,599 | +51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 913 | 5,998 | +557% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 13,818 | 8,326 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,380 | 6,122 | +157% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 11,846 | 8,136 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,698 | 6,002 | +253% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 12,247 | 10,498 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,250 | 6,650 | +196% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 15,000 | 7,125 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,320 | 5,818 | +151% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 16,543 | 9,751 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,083 | 6,325 | +105% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 14,714 | 10,700 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,073 | 6,817 | +229% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 12,336 | 8,712 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,950 | 6,253 | +221% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 11,731 | 12,708 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,748 | 6,520 | +273% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 15,154 | 15,858 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,573 | 7,136 | +177% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 9,007 | 3,216 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,420 | 5,318 | +275% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 15,265 | 15,184 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,301 | 7,180 | +212% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 12,898 | 10,707 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,303 | 6,619 | +187% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 6,614 | 2,700 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,194 | 5,151 | +331% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.