Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →levnikolaevich/ln-75-architecture-diagram-builder
Creates evidence-backed current or target architecture diagrams when the diagram is the primary deliverable. Not for UI design, architecture audit, or invented structure.
Passed 7 of 12 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 12 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
6 fixed6 passed either way7 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When reporting the completed architecture diagram evaluation for `services/search-api`, in what exact section order must the final output report be structured?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Structures the report with section 1 as Result, section 2 as Scope, section 3 as Evidence, section 4 as Verification, and section 5 as Completion. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Goal: Create the smallest set of understandable, evidence-backed diagrams needed to communicate current or proposed architecture. Change only approved architecture documentation; do not invent relationships, perform visual product design, replace prose evidence, audit fitness, or edit implementation.
Execution contract: The ordered checkboxes are the Definition of Done. Track every item internally as PENDING, PROVEN with concrete evidence, CLEARED with evidence that its condition is absent, or UNPROVEN with a gap; reading, delegation, or tool failure is not proof. Reconcile items after each section. Before returning, resolve all PENDING and count only PROVEN and CLEARED; apply the skill's verdict and approval rules to every gap.
Preserve user intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. Scale depth to material risk without silently skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety ordering; otherwise choose the verification method appropriate to each obligation.
| Need | Preferred capability | Fallback |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture evidence | Repository files, runtime wiring, IaC, contracts, and approved artifacts | User-provided model with UNVERIFIED labels |
| Relationship tracing | Language intelligence, dependency tools, and focused search | Direct inspection of producers, consumers, and registrations |
| Diagram format | Existing repository convention and renderer | Mermaid in Markdown, then plain ASCII |
| Syntax verification | Repository renderer, parser, or preview | Manual fence, identifier, and relationship inspection |
| Document mutation | Minimal patch to approved diagram artifacts | Return BLOCKED if path or evidence boundary is unsafe |
Diagrams communicate a model; executable behavior remains authoritative for current state. Keep current, target, and transition views visibly distinct.
docs/architecture/diagrams/<view>.md.test cases passed, vs 5 / 12 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.