Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Differential gene expression analysis for bulk RNA-seq with PyDESeq2, including formulaic designs, Wald tests, FDR correction, LFC shrinkage, and result visualization.
.claude/skills/lingxling-pydeseq2/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 182% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 143% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 121% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 149% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 208% | 0% |
PyDESeq2 is a Python implementation of DESeq2 for differential expression analysis with bulk RNA-seq data. Design and execute complete workflows from data loading through result interpretation, including formulaic single-factor and multi-factor designs, Wald tests with multiple testing correction, optional apeGLM shrinkage, and integration with pandas and AnnData.
This skill should be used when:
For users who want to perform a standard differential expression analysis:
pythonimport pandas as pd from pydeseq2.dds import DeseqDataSet from pydeseq2.default_inference import DefaultInference from pydeseq2.ds import DeseqStats # 1. Load data counts_df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0).T # Transpose to samples × genes metadata = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0) # 2. Filter low-count genes genes_to_keep = counts_df.columns[counts_df.sum(axis=0) >= 10] counts_df = counts_df[genes_to_keep] # 3. Make the reference level explicit and fit DESeq2 metadata["condition"] = pd.Categorical( metadata["condition"], categories=["control", "treated"] ) inference = DefaultInference(n_cpus=4) dds = DeseqDataSet( counts=counts_df, metadata=metadata, design="~condition", refit_cooks=True, inference=inference, ) dds.deseq2() # 4. Perform statistical testing ds = DeseqStats( dds, contrast=["condition", "treated", "control"], inference=inference, ) ds.summary() # 5. Access results results = ds.results_df significant = results[results.padj < 0.05] print(f"Found {len(significant)} significant genes")
Input requirements:
Common data loading patterns:
python# From CSV (typical format: genes × samples, needs transpose) counts_df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0).T metadata = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0) # From TSV counts_df = pd.read_csv("counts.tsv", sep="\t", index_col=0).T # From AnnData import anndata as ad adata = ad.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") counts_df = pd.DataFrame(adata.X, index=adata.obs_names, columns=adata.var_names) metadata = adata.obs
Data filtering:
python# Remove low-count genes genes_to_keep = counts_df.columns[counts_df.sum(axis=0) >= 10] counts_df = counts_df[genes_to_keep] # Remove samples with missing metadata samples_to_keep = ~metadata.condition.isna() counts_df = counts_df.loc[samples_to_keep] metadata = metadata.loc[samples_to_keep]
The design formula specifies how gene expression is modeled.
Single-factor designs:
pythondesign = "~condition" # Simple two-group comparison
Multi-factor designs:
pythondesign = "~batch + condition" # Control for batch effects design = "~age + condition" # Include continuous covariate design = "~group + condition + group:condition" # Interaction effects
Design formula guidelines:
C(variable) or a pandas categorical dtypedesign_factors, continuous_factors, or ref_level arguments in new workflowsInitialize the DeseqDataSet and run the complete pipeline:
pythonfrom pydeseq2.dds import DeseqDataSet from pydeseq2.default_inference import DefaultInference inference = DefaultInference(n_cpus=4) dds = DeseqDataSet( counts=counts_df, metadata=metadata, design="~condition", refit_cooks=True, # Refit after removing outliers inference=inference, low_memory=False, ) # Run the complete DESeq2 pipeline dds.deseq2()
What deseq2() does:
Perform Wald tests to identify differentially expressed genes:
pythonfrom pydeseq2.ds import DeseqStats ds = DeseqStats( dds, contrast=["condition", "treated", "control"], # Test treated vs control alpha=0.05, # Significance threshold cooks_filter=True, # Filter outliers independent_filter=True # Filter low-power tests ) ds.summary()
Contrast specification:
[variable, test_level, reference_level]["condition", "treated", "control"] tests treated vs controlcontrastResult DataFrame columns:
baseMean: Mean normalized count across sampleslog2FoldChange: Log2 fold change between conditionslfcSE: Standard error of LFCstat: Wald test statisticpvalue: Raw p-valuepadj: Adjusted p-value (FDR-corrected via Benjamini-Hochberg)Apply shrinkage to reduce noise in fold change estimates:
pythonds.lfc_shrink(coeff="condition[T.treated]") # Applies apeGLM shrinkage
When to use LFC shrinkage:
Important: Shrinkage affects only the log2FoldChange values, not the statistical test results (p-values remain unchanged). Use shrunk values for visualization but report unshrunken p-values for significance.
Save results and intermediate objects:
python# Export results as CSV ds.results_df.to_csv("deseq2_results.csv") # Save significant genes only significant = ds.results_df[ds.results_df.padj < 0.05] significant.to_csv("significant_genes.csv") # Save a portable AnnData object for later inspection dds.to_picklable_anndata().write_h5ad("dds_result.h5ad")
Avoid loading pickle files from untrusted sources. For exchange between agents, pipelines, or collaborators, prefer CSV results and .h5ad AnnData files.
Standard case-control comparison:
pythondds = DeseqDataSet(counts=counts_df, metadata=metadata, design="~condition") dds.deseq2() ds = DeseqStats(dds, contrast=["condition", "treated", "control"]) ds.summary() results = ds.results_df significant = results[results.padj < 0.05]
Testing multiple treatment groups against control:
pythondds = DeseqDataSet(counts=counts_df, metadata=metadata, design="~condition") dds.deseq2() treatments = ["treatment_A", "treatment_B", "treatment_C"] all_results = {} for treatment in treatments: ds = DeseqStats(dds, contrast=["condition", treatment, "control"]) ds.summary() all_results[treatment] = ds.results_df sig_count = len(ds.results_df[ds.results_df.padj < 0.05]) print(f"{treatment}: {sig_count} significant genes")
Control for technical variation:
python# Include batch in design dds = DeseqDataSet(counts=counts_df, metadata=metadata, design="~batch + condition") dds.deseq2() # Test condition while controlling for batch ds = DeseqStats(dds, contrast=["condition", "treated", "control"]) ds.summary()
Include continuous variables like age or dosage:
python# Ensure continuous variable is numeric metadata["age"] = pd.to_numeric(metadata["age"]) dds = DeseqDataSet(counts=counts_df, metadata=metadata, design="~age + condition") dds.deseq2() ds = DeseqStats(dds, contrast=["condition", "treated", "control"]) ds.summary()
This skill includes a complete command-line script for standard analyses:
bash# Basic usage python scripts/run_deseq2_analysis.py \ --counts counts.csv \ --metadata metadata.csv \ --design "~condition" \ --contrast condition treated control \ --output results/ # With additional options python scripts/run_deseq2_analysis.py \ --counts counts.csv \ --metadata metadata.csv \ --design "~batch + condition" \ --contrast condition treated control \ --output results/ \ --min-counts 10 \ --alpha 0.05 \ --n-cpus 4 \ --shrink-coeff "condition[T.treated]" \ --plots
Script features:
Refer users to scripts/run_deseq2_analysis.py when they need a standalone analysis tool or want to batch process multiple datasets.
python# Filter by adjusted p-value significant = ds.results_df[ds.results_df.padj < 0.05] # Filter by both significance and effect size sig_and_large = ds.results_df[ (ds.results_df.padj < 0.05) & (abs(ds.results_df.log2FoldChange) > 1) ] # Separate up- and down-regulated upregulated = significant[significant.log2FoldChange > 0] downregulated = significant[significant.log2FoldChange < 0] print(f"Upregulated: {len(upregulated)}") print(f"Downregulated: {len(downregulated)}")
python# Sort by adjusted p-value top_by_padj = ds.results_df.sort_values("padj").head(20) # Sort by absolute fold change (use shrunk values) ds.lfc_shrink(coeff="condition[T.treated]") ds.results_df["abs_lfc"] = abs(ds.results_df.log2FoldChange) top_by_lfc = ds.results_df.sort_values("abs_lfc", ascending=False).head(20) # Sort by a combined metric ds.results_df["score"] = -np.log10(ds.results_df.padj) * abs(ds.results_df.log2FoldChange) top_combined = ds.results_df.sort_values("score", ascending=False).head(20)
python# Check normalization (size factors should be close to 1) print("Size factors:", dds.obs["size_factors"]) # Examine dispersion estimates import matplotlib.pyplot as plt plt.hist(dds.var["dispersions"], bins=50) plt.xlabel("Dispersion") plt.ylabel("Frequency") plt.title("Dispersion Distribution") plt.show() # Check p-value distribution (should be mostly flat with peak near 0) plt.hist(ds.results_df.pvalue.dropna(), bins=50) plt.xlabel("P-value") plt.ylabel("Frequency") plt.title("P-value Distribution") plt.show()
Visualize significance vs effect size:
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt import numpy as np results = ds.results_df.copy() results["-log10(padj)"] = -np.log10(results.padj) plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) significant = results.padj < 0.05 plt.scatter( results.loc[~significant, "log2FoldChange"], results.loc[~significant, "-log10(padj)"], alpha=0.3, s=10, c='gray', label='Not significant' ) plt.scatter( results.loc[significant, "log2FoldChange"], results.loc[significant, "-log10(padj)"], alpha=0.6, s=10, c='red', label='padj < 0.05' ) plt.axhline(-np.log10(0.05), color='blue', linestyle='--', alpha=0.5) plt.xlabel("Log2 Fold Change") plt.ylabel("-Log10(Adjusted P-value)") plt.title("Volcano Plot") plt.legend() plt.savefig("volcano_plot.png", dpi=300)
Show fold change vs mean expression:
pythonplt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) plt.scatter( np.log10(results.loc[~significant, "baseMean"] + 1), results.loc[~significant, "log2FoldChange"], alpha=0.3, s=10, c='gray' ) plt.scatter( np.log10(results.loc[significant, "baseMean"] + 1), results.loc[significant, "log2FoldChange"], alpha=0.6, s=10, c='red' ) plt.axhline(0, color='blue', linestyle='--', alpha=0.5) plt.xlabel("Log10(Base Mean + 1)") plt.ylabel("Log2 Fold Change") plt.title("MA Plot") plt.savefig("ma_plot.png", dpi=300)
Issue: "Index mismatch between counts and metadata"
Solution: Ensure sample names match exactly
pythonprint("Counts samples:", counts_df.index.tolist()) print("Metadata samples:", metadata.index.tolist()) # Take intersection if needed common = counts_df.index.intersection(metadata.index) counts_df = counts_df.loc[common] metadata = metadata.loc[common]
Issue: "All genes have zero counts"
Solution: Check if data needs transposition
pythonprint(f"Counts shape: {counts_df.shape}") # If genes > samples, transpose is needed if counts_df.shape[1] < counts_df.shape[0]: counts_df = counts_df.T
Issue: "Design matrix is not full rank"
Cause: Confounded variables (e.g., all treated samples in one batch)
Solution: Remove confounded variable or add interaction term
python# Check confounding print(pd.crosstab(metadata.condition, metadata.batch)) # Either simplify design or add interaction design = "~condition" # Remove batch # OR design = "~condition + batch + condition:batch" # Model interaction
Diagnostics:
python# Check dispersion distribution plt.hist(dds.var["dispersions"], bins=50) plt.show() # Check size factors print(dds.obs["size_factors"]) # Look at top genes by raw p-value print(ds.results_df.nsmallest(20, "pvalue"))
Possible causes:
For comprehensive details beyond this workflow-oriented guide:
references/api_reference.md): Complete documentation of PyDESeq2 classes, methods, and data structures. Use when needing detailed parameter information or understanding object attributes.references/workflow_guide.md): In-depth guide covering complete analysis workflows, data loading patterns, multi-factor designs, troubleshooting, and best practices. Use when handling complex experimental designs or encountering issues.Load these references into context when users need:
Read references/api_reference.mdRead references/workflow_guide.mdRead references/workflow_guide.md (see Troubleshooting section).T if needed."~batch + condition" not "~condition + batch").padj < 0.05 for significance, not raw p-values. The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controls false discovery rate.[variable, test_level, reference_level] where test_level is compared against reference_level.dds.to_picklable_anndata().write_h5ad("dds_result.h5ad") for portable outputs. Only load pickle files that you created yourself and trust.bashuv pip install pydeseq2==0.5.4
System requirements:
Optional for visualization:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | fail→pass | 16,428 | 13,020 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,403 | 6,776 | +182% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 14,753 | 14,501 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,867 | 6,970 | +143% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 26,840 | 15,910 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,291 | 8,089 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 21,586 | 11,841 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,173 | 7,022 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 12,387 | 6,978 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,841 | 6,220 | +238% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 11,976 | 15,451 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,063 | 7,093 | +244% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 20,456 | 13,857 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,937 | 7,320 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 8,400 | 5,909 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,198 | 5,794 | +384% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 11,730 | 9,651 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,189 | 6,750 | +208% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 9,674 | 7,435 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,783 | 6,245 | +250% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 15,289 | 10,245 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,518 | 6,767 | +169% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,082 | 16,640 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,109 | 7,496 | +255% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 13,941 | 11,951 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,070 | 6,599 | +219% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 18,717 | 9,872 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,683 | 6,363 | +137% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 16,887 | 7,694 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,626 | 5,965 | +127% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 18,985 | 20,639 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,751 | 7,999 | +191% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 17,919 | 13,695 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,574 | 7,351 | +186% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 15,624 | 11,016 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,006 | 6,951 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 9,356 | 7,308 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,510 | 6,101 | +304% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 14,097 | 17,420 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,473 | 7,567 | +206% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 15,233 | 17,249 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,392 | 7,486 | +213% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 16,968 | 15,729 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,895 | 7,766 | +168% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.