Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →microck/cookbook-audit
Audit an Anthropic Cookbook notebook based on a rubric.
Passed 9 of 16 test cases with the skill, and 5 of 16 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
7 fixed6 passed either way8 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What is the second scoring section header in the standard audit report structure?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Uses '#### 2. Code Quality: X/5' as the second detailed scoring header | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Review the requested Cookbook notebook using the guidelines and rubrics in style_guide.md. Provide a score based on scoring guidelines and recommendations on improving the cookbook.
The style guide provides detailed templates and examples for:
IMPORTANT: Always read style_guide.md first before conducting an audit. The style guide contains the canonical templates and good/bad examples to reference.
Follow these steps for a comprehensive audit:
style_guide.md to understand current best practicespython3 validate_notebook.py <path> to catch technical issues and generate markdown
scripts/detect-secrets/plugins.pyscripts/detect-secrets/.secrets.baselinetmp/ folder for easier review (saves context vs raw .ipynb)
Present your audit using this structure:
test cases passed, vs 5 / 16 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.