Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Comprehensive cryptocurrency market research and analysis using specialized AI agents. Analyzes market data, price trends, news sentiment, technical indicators, macro correlations, and investment opportunities. Use when researching cryptocurrencies, analyzing crypto markets, evaluating digital assets, or investigating blockchain projects like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, etc.
.claude/skills/microck-crypto-research/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 95% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -28% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 5% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 62% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 4% | 0% |
This skill provides comprehensive cryptocurrency research by orchestrating multiple specialized AI agents that analyze different aspects of the crypto market in parallel.
Invoke this skill when the user:
Coordinates 4-12 specialized agents running in parallel:
Research results are saved in timestamped directories:
outputs/
└── YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS/
├── crypto_market/
├── crypto_analysis/
├── crypto_macro/
├── crypto_plays/
└── crypto_news/Based on user request or context:
date command to get timestampscripts/setup-output-dir.shAgents are defined in agent-prompts/ directory:
coin-analyzer.md - Receives ticker symbol parametermarket-agent.md - General market analysismacro-correlation-scanner.md - Correlation analysisinvestment-plays.md - Investment opportunitiesnews-scanner.md - News aggregationprice-check.md - Current pricing datamovers.md - Top movers analysisEach agent prompt includes:
See workflows/lightweight.md for implementation details.
When: User asks quick question about crypto Agents: 4 haiku agents Duration: ~30-60 seconds
See workflows/comprehensive.md for implementation details.
When: User needs deep analysis or multiple perspectives Agents: 12 agents (haiku, sonnet, opus variations) Duration: ~2-5 minutes
See workflows/output-only.md for implementation details.
When: Background research or automated workflows Agents: Configurable Output: Files only, no interactive output
Example 1: Specific Coin Analysis
User: "What's happening with Bitcoin?"
Action: Launch lightweight mode with BTC as ticker
Agents: 4 haiku agents analyzing Bitcoin specifically
Output: Quick analysis in ~30 secondsExample 2: Market Overview
User: "How are crypto markets doing today?"
Action: Launch market-focused agents
Agents: Market agent + movers + macro correlation
Output: Market overview with key moversExample 3: Investment Research
User: "I'm looking for good crypto investment opportunities"
Action: Launch comprehensive mode
Agents: All 12 agents for multi-perspective analysis
Output: Comprehensive report with opportunitiesCoin analyzer agents accept a ticker symbol:
If agents fail or timeout:
For detailed information, see:
reference/agent-design.md - How agents are structuredreference/usage-guide.md - Detailed usage instructionsworkflows/*.md - Specific workflow implementations| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 13,381 | 7,744 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,690 | 1,697 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 30,452 | 27,082 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,801 | 5,445 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 8,260 | 6,638 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 805 | 1,585 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 9,025 | 12,043 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,305 | 2,551 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 7,263 | 6,572 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,329 | 1,543 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 14,853 | 2,763 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,302 | 1,662 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 18,021 | 1,385 | -92% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,008 | 1,447 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 7,494 | 2,324 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,253 | 1,527 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 9,515 | 1,465 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,354 | 1,427 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 6,839 | 2,766 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,048 | 1,696 | +62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→fail | 8,559 | 4,921 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,305 | 1,442 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 17,700 | 19,776 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,756 | 3,897 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 18,452 | 6,151 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,936 | 1,472 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 18,045 | 6,430 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,577 | 1,560 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 3,587 | 10,433 | +191% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 524 | 1,500 | +186% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 3,808 | 7,192 | +89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 563 | 1,827 | +225% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 12,868 | 5,548 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,994 | 2,164 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 8,486 | 1,757 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,434 | 1,494 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,525 | 5,233 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,140 | 2,073 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 7,595 | 6,940 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,162 | 2,297 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 8,536 | 4,097 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,408 | 1,363 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,899 | 19,360 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,555 | 4,450 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 12 counted toward the lift figure. The other 10 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 12 comparable cases. 5 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.