Ready to supercharge your AI agents?

Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.

Interview Scheduler · migrateforce | DecimalAI

migrateforce/interview-scheduler

SkillScore83Maintained

Coordinate and schedule interviews between candidates and hiring teams. Use when booking phone screens, technical interviews, or panel interviews across multiple calendars.

productivityby migrateforce

Links this skill to your agents and keeps it current with the author’s updates.

Automatic

Recruiting pack

1 · One-time — install the CLI (docs ↗)

pip install decimalai

2 · Get the skill — writes .claude/skills/migrateforce-interview-scheduler/SKILL.md

decimalai skills pull migrateforce-interview-scheduler --out .claude/skills/

No CLI? Get the same file — curl · raw file

curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/migrateforce-interview-scheduler/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/migrateforce-interview-scheduler/SKILL.md

Raw file: /s/migrateforce-interview-scheduler/SKILL.md ↗ · machine-readable summary at /s/migrateforce-interview-scheduler.json ↗

In productionGlobal

how this skill behaves on real traffic · last 30 days

No production data for this skill yet — usage numbers appear here once agents start running it.

Anonymized aggregate across every org using this skill — proof from real production use, not a demo.

Does this skill help? · Benchmark: with vs. withoutsign in to run this on your agents

23 test cases from the publisher’s eval.yaml · each run twice on gemini-3.6-flash — with the skill injected, then without · last run 55d ago

Yes — +57% lift · at higher cost+28% tokens0% turns83% of whole cases pass with skill (19/23)

Test case	Without → With	Effect	Δ tokens	Δ turns
case-06	✗→✓	▲ Improved	253%	0%
case-01	✗→✓	▲ Improved	1164%	0%
case-05	✗→✓	▲ Improved	34%	0%
case-08	✗→✓	▲ Improved	50%	0%
case-09	✗→✓	▲ Improved	277%	0%

Showing 5 of 23 cases

SkillSafety

✓ 3 of 3 passed

Code scan15 of 15 checks clean

0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v4 — 8/1/2026

live_secretremote_code_executionreverse_shelldata_exfiltrationssrf_metadataagent_snoopinganti_refusaldestructive_commandsobfuscated_unicodeunicode_homoglyphopaque_blobsuspicious_urltool_overreachtrigger_abuseprompt_injection_phrasing

IntentSafe

LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims

ContentClean

LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review

Source

Imported

migrateforce / migrateforce-skills

skills/interview-scheduler/SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

License MITImported 8/1/2026Version v1

Skill contents

SKILL.md

Summary

This skill automates the interview scheduling process by finding available time slots across candidate and interviewer calendars, sending invites, and handling rescheduling requests. Eliminates the back-and-forth email chains that typically take 3-5 days.

Inputs

| Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | candidate | object | yes | Candidate info (name, email, timezone) | | interviewers | array | yes | List of interviewer emails | | interview_type | enum | yes | phone_screen, technical, behavioral, panel, onsite | | duration_minutes | number | yes | Interview length (30, 45, 60, 90) | | date_range | object | no | Start and end dates to search (default: next 2 weeks) | | candidate_availability | array | no | Pre-provided available slots | | priority | enum | no | normal, urgent, flexible | | location | string | no | Office location, video link, or "remote" |

Outputs

| Field | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | scheduled_time | datetime | Confirmed interview time | | calendar_event_id | string | Calendar event identifier | | video_link | string | Zoom/Meet/Teams link | | confirmation_sent | boolean | Whether invites were sent | | interviewer_conflicts | array | Any interviewers who couldn't make it |

Workflow

1. Gather Availability

Candidate:

Check provided availability windows
Or send availability request email
Account for timezone differences

Interviewers:

Query calendar APIs (Google, Outlook)
Respect working hours preferences
Check for conflicts and blocked time

2. Find Optimal Slots

SCORING CRITERIA:
- All required interviewers available: +50
- Within candidate's preferred times: +20
- Not during lunch (12-1pm): +10
- Not first/last hour of day: +10
- Adequate prep time between interviews: +10

3. Present Options

Offer candidate 3 time slots:

Best overall match
Earliest available
Most convenient for candidate timezone

4. Confirm and Book

Create calendar events for all participants
Generate video conference link
Send confirmation emails with:
Date/time in recipient's timezone
Video link and dial-in
Interview format and duration
Interviewer names and roles
Prep materials (if any)

5. Handle Changes

Reschedule requests:

Find new available slots
Update all calendar events
Send updated invites

Cancellations:

Remove calendar events
Notify all participants
Log reason if provided

Interview Types

| Type | Duration | Participants | Notes | |------|----------|--------------|-------| | Phone Screen | 30 min | 1 recruiter | Initial qualification | | Technical | 60-90 min | 1-2 engineers | Coding/system design | | Behavioral | 45-60 min | 1 hiring manager | Culture fit | | Panel | 60 min | 3-5 interviewers | Multiple perspectives | | Onsite | 4-6 hours | 5-8 interviewers | Full interview loop |

Calendar Integrations

| Platform | API | Capabilities | |----------|-----|--------------| | Google Calendar | Calendar API v3 | Full read/write | | Microsoft 365 | Graph API | Full read/write | | Calendly | REST API | Availability only | | Zoom | REST API | Meeting creation |

Example Usage

User: Schedule a technical interview for Sarah Chen with the backend team

Agent: I'll schedule a technical interview for Sarah Chen.

**Checking availability...**
- Sarah Chen (PST): Available Mon-Wed afternoons
- Mike (interviewer, EST): Available all week
- Lisa (interviewer, EST): Blocked Mon, available Tue-Fri

**Recommended slots:**
1. Tuesday 2:00 PM PST / 5:00 PM EST (60 min) ⭐ Best match
2. Wednesday 1:00 PM PST / 4:00 PM EST (60 min)
3. Wednesday 3:00 PM PST / 6:00 PM EST (60 min)

User: Book option 1

Agent: ✓ Interview scheduled

**Details:**
- Date: Tuesday, Feb 4, 2025
- Time: 2:00 PM PST / 5:00 PM EST
- Duration: 60 minutes
- Interviewers: Mike (System Design), Lisa (Coding)
- Location: Zoom (link in invite)

Calendar invites sent to:
- sarah.chen@email.com
- mike@company.com
- lisa@company.com

Email Templates

Availability Request

Subject: Interview Availability - [Company] [Role]

Hi [Candidate],

We'd like to schedule your [interview_type] interview for the [role] position.

Please share your availability for the next two weeks:
[Calendly link or reply with times]

The interview will be [duration] minutes via [video/phone/onsite].

Best,
[Recruiter]

Confirmation

Subject: Interview Confirmed - [Date] at [Time]

Hi [Candidate],

Your interview is confirmed:

📅 [Day], [Date]
🕐 [Time] [Timezone]
⏱️ [Duration] minutes
📍 [Location/Video Link]

You'll be meeting with:
- [Interviewer 1], [Title]
- [Interviewer 2], [Title]

[Prep instructions if any]

Good luck!
[Recruiter]

Integration Points

Upstream: candidate-screening (shortlisted candidates)
Downstream: interview-feedback, offer-letter-generator
Triggers: Candidate moved to "Schedule Interview" stage in ATS

Illustrative Want to see what migrateforce/interview-scheduler would put in front of your model? Preview the rendered body and check its trigger phrases — no LLM call, no signup.

Latest benchmark · publisher runVerified

8/3/2026, 23:52 UTC · 23 cases

Lift

+57%

83% vs 26%

Agent turns

1.0 vs 1.0

Tokens

+28%

1,742.86 vs 1,366.91

fail → pass · 13pass → pass · 6fail → fail · 4

Per-case results (23)

Case	Status	Duration (ms)			Turns			Tokens			Tool calls
Case	Status	Without	With	Δ	Without	With	Δ	Without	With	Δ	Without	With	Δ
case-06 In the time slot scoring logic, what point weight is awarded to a prospective meeting slot for avoiding the 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM lunch window?	fail→pass	2,983	1,470	-51%	1	1	0%	453	1,600	+253%	0	0	—
case-01 We need to schedule a 60-minute panel interview for candidate Jordan Lee (jordan.l@example.com, EST) involving interviewers dev1@company.com, dev2@company.com, and pm@company.com. Please run the booking workflow and output the chosen scheduled time, calendar event identifier, video meeting URL, confirmation status boolean, and a list of interviewer conflicts if any exist.	fail→pass	5,704	8,073	+42%	1	1	0%	222	2,806	+1164%	0	0	—
case-02 A candidate completed their technical loop yesterday. Here are notes from three interviewers regarding coding proficiency and communication. Please aggregate these into a final hiring recommendation score and feedback report.	fail→fail	7,181	5,346	-26%	1	1	0%	1,206	2,226	+85%	0	0	—
case-03 Candidate Alex Rivera accepted our verbal offer for Senior Systems Engineer. Please draft a formal compensation and benefits offer letter including stock option grant details.	fail→fail	11,245	9,653	-14%	1	1	0%	2,049	3,158	+54%	0	0	—
case-04 We received 40 resumes for the DevOps Lead opening. Please screen these candidates against our required skills list and produce a shortlisted candidates report.	fail→fail	4,371	4,830	+11%	1	1	0%	736	2,045	+178%	0	0	—
case-05 When evaluating candidate time slots during interview scheduling, what point value is added to a slot's score if every required interviewer is available?	fail→pass	7,163	1,303	-82%	1	1	0%	1,152	1,541	+34%	0	0	—
case-07 When calculating the slot score for candidate options, how many bonus points are given for avoiding the first or last hour of the workday?	pass→pass	9,636	1,570	-84%	1	1	0%	1,524	1,640	+8%	0	0	—
case-08 How many points are added to an interview slot score to account for adequate preparation time between interviews?	fail→pass	6,372	1,474	-77%	1	1	0%	1,035	1,551	+50%	0	0	—
case-09 If a proposed interview slot falls within the candidate's explicit preferred availability window, how many score points does it receive?	fail→pass	3,095	1,654	-47%	1	1	0%	422	1,592	+277%	0	0	—
case-10 A recruiter requests interview scheduling without providing start or end search dates. What is the standard default date range window for searching availability?	pass→pass	12,156	1,314	-89%	1	1	0%	1,266	1,560	+23%	0	0	—
case-11 When presenting interview availability choices to a candidate before booking, how many time slot options should be provided and what criteria define option 1 and option 3?	fail→fail	10,040	2,376	-76%	1	1	0%	1,864	1,773	-5%	0	0	—
case-12 What are the standard expected duration and interviewer headcount range for an Onsite interview loop?	fail→pass	9,974	1,113	-89%	1	1	0%	1,746	1,490	-15%	0	0	—
case-13 What are the default duration options and interviewer participant requirements for a Technical interview type?	pass→pass	8,703	1,853	-79%	1	1	0%	1,475	1,648	+12%	0	0	—
case-14 What are the baseline duration and participant specifications for a Phone Screen interview?	pass→pass	7,847	1,644	-79%	1	1	0%	1,356	1,588	+17%	0	0	—
case-15 What is the standard duration range and primary participant role for a Behavioral interview?	fail→pass	6,193	1,478	-76%	1	1	0%	1,103	1,523	+38%	0	0	—
case-16 What are the standard duration and recommended interviewer count for a Panel interview type?	fail→pass	7,215	1,226	-83%	1	1	0%	1,270	1,481	+17%	0	0	—
case-17 Which specific APIs are integrated for Google Calendar and Microsoft 365 to provide full read/write scheduling capabilities?	pass→pass	10,764	1,890	-82%	1	1	0%	2,008	1,651	-18%	0	0	—
case-18 What API type is connected for Calendly integrations and what restricted capability scope does it provide compared to full calendar platforms?	fail→pass	11,252	1,775	-84%	1	1	0%	1,934	1,648	-15%	0	0	—
case-19 When returning JSON results after scheduling an interview, what are the exact key names for the calendar event ID, confirmed datetime, and interviewer conflicts array?	fail→pass	9,761	1,923	-80%	1	1	0%	1,790	1,699	-5%	0	0	—
case-20 In an automated recruiting pipeline, which system component provides upstream shortlisted candidates and which component receives downstream output after scheduling?	fail→pass	7,300	2,029	-72%	1	1	0%	1,059	1,652	+56%	0	0	—
case-21 What are the valid enum choices for the priority input field when requesting interview coordination?	fail→pass	6,538	1,544	-76%	1	1	0%	1,054	1,566	+49%	0	0	—
case-22 When handling a reschedule request from a candidate, what specific actions must be performed on existing calendar events and invitations?	fail→pass	10,136	4,225	-58%	1	1	0%	1,519	2,037	+34%	0	0	—
case-23 When an interview cancellation request is processed, what steps must be executed regarding calendar events and attendee notifications?	pass→pass	12,261	2,108	-83%	1	1	0%	2,051	1,674	-18%	0	0	—

These cases were also screened by the skill’s intent / safety pass.See the Trust review ↗Reproduce this benchmark in Colab ↗

How this skill was measured

DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +57 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.

Model measured: gemini-3.6-flash
Graded by: gemini-3.6-flash
Grading method: judged
Verification: verified
Pass rate without the skill: 26.1%
Pass rate with the skill: 82.6%
Cases attempted: 23
Cases counted toward lift: 22
Cases that regressed: 0
Skill version measured: v1
Run completed: 8/3/2026, 23:52 UTC

Measured example — same prompt, with vs. without the skill · from the benchmark run · case case-06

Prompt

In the time slot scoring logic, what point weight is awarded to a prospective meeting slot for avoiding the 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM lunch window?

Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.

Show both answers

SkillScore blends 4 signals1 of 4 complete

BenchmarkPass rate WITH skill on a verified run83

Live evalNeeds ≥10 evaluated traces in 30 days

AI ratingNeeds ≥10 rated traces

AdoptionNeeds ≥10 serves across ≥2 orgs in 30 days

Efficiency · separate axis (at equal correctness)+0% turns+1% tokens

Shown for transparency; not credited unless a verified run shows no correctness regression.

Backed by 1 of 4 signals — each added signal makes the score more robust.

Verified on gemini-3.6-flash · re-tested 54 days ago

Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.