Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Conduct and document professional reference checks for final-stage candidates. Use when verifying candidate backgrounds before extending offers.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 55% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 55% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 77% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 32% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 75% | 0% |
This skill streamlines the reference check process by generating structured questionnaires, scheduling calls with references, documenting responses, and synthesizing findings into actionable hiring recommendations.
| Field | Type | Required | Description | |-------|------|----------|-------------| | candidate_name | string | yes | Candidate being evaluated | | job_title | string | yes | Role they're being considered for | | references | array | yes | List of reference contacts | | key_competencies | array | yes | Skills/behaviors to verify | | concerns | array | no | Specific areas to probe | | check_type | enum | no | standard, executive, technical |
| Field | Type | Description | |-------|------|-------------| | reference_summaries | array | Summary from each reference | | competency_scores | object | Rating per competency | | red_flags | array | Concerns identified | | recommendation | enum | strong_hire, hire, no_hire, needs_discussion | | full_report | document | Complete reference check report |
Standard Questions:
Role-Specific Questions:
Outreach Email:
Subject: Reference Request for [Candidate Name]
Dear [Reference Name],
[Candidate] has applied for a [Role] position at [Company] and provided
your name as a professional reference.
We'd appreciate 15 minutes of your time to discuss their qualifications.
Would any of these times work?
[Time slot 1]
[Time slot 2]
[Time slot 3]
If you prefer, you can complete a brief written questionnaire instead: [link]
Thank you for your time.
[Recruiter name]Call Structure (15 min):
Probing Techniques:
json{ "reference_name": "Jane Smith", "relationship": "Direct manager, 2 years", "company": "Previous Corp", "date_checked": "2025-02-01", "responses": { "strengths": ["Technical depth", "Mentorship"], "growth_areas": ["Public speaking", "Delegation"], "specific_example": "Led migration project...", "would_rehire": true, "rehire_enthusiasm": "Absolutely, without hesitation" }, "overall_sentiment": "strongly_positive" }
Competency Matrix: | Competency | Ref 1 | Ref 2 | Ref 3 | Avg | |------------|-------|-------|-------|-----| | Technical Skills | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4.7 | | Communication | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4.3 | | Leadership | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.7 | | Reliability | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5.0 |
Red Flag Categories:
markdown# Reference Check Report **Candidate:** [Name] **Position:** [Role] **Date:** [Date] **Checked by:** [Recruiter] ## Summary [2-3 sentence executive summary] ## References Contacted ### Reference 1: Jane Smith - **Relationship:** Direct manager (2019-2021) - **Company:** Previous Corp - **Key Feedback:** [Summary] - **Sentiment:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Strongly Positive ### Reference 2: Mike Johnson [...] ## Competency Assessment | Competency | Rating | Evidence | |------------|--------|----------| | Technical | 4.7/5 | "Strongest engineer on the team" | | Leadership | 3.7/5 | "Growing into leadership role" | ## Themes **Consistent Strengths:** - [Strength 1] - [Strength 2] **Development Areas:** - [Area 1] - [Area 2] ## Red Flags [None identified / List any concerns] ## Recommendation ☑️ **STRONG HIRE** - All references enthusiastic, no concerns raised ## Raw Notes [Detailed call notes appended]
User: Run reference checks for David Kim, final candidate for Engineering Manager
Agent: I'll conduct reference checks for David Kim.
**References provided:**
1. Sarah Chen - Former director at TechCo
2. Mike Park - Peer engineer at TechCo
3. Lisa Wang - Direct report at TechCo
**Key competencies to verify:**
- Technical leadership
- People management
- Cross-functional collaboration
- Conflict resolution
**Outreach sent:** Feb 1, 2025
---
**Reference Check Complete**
## Summary
David receives strong endorsements from all three references. Former director
describes him as "top 10% of engineering managers I've worked with." Direct
report highlights his mentorship. One note: peer mentioned he can be
"too detail-oriented" in code reviews.
## Scores
- Technical Leadership: 4.8/5
- People Management: 4.5/5
- Collaboration: 4.3/5
- Conflict Resolution: 4.0/5
## Key Quotes
> "David turned around a struggling team in 6 months. Retention went from
> 40% to 90%." - Sarah Chen
> "Best manager I've had. He genuinely cared about my growth." - Lisa Wang
## Recommendation
✅ **STRONG HIRE**
No red flags. Consistent positive feedback across all references.
Minor development area (code review thoroughness) is actually a strength
for a management role.candidate-screeningoffer-letter-generator, hiring decisionOther measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.