Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mims-harvard/tooluniverse-computational-biophysics
Solve quantitative problems in biophysics — pharmacokinetics (PK volume of distribution, clearance, half-life), epidemiology (R0, attack rate), toxicology (LD50, NOAEL), population genetics (Hardy-Weinberg, Fst), enzyme kinetics (Michaelis-Menten), thermodynamics.
Passed 18 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 21 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
11 fixed8 passed either way2 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
You have completed evaluating a multiple-choice pharmacokinetics question and reasoned that option B (Clearance) is correct, but your drafted answer string currently says C. What validation step should you execute using local scripts before outputting?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response recommends executing mc_analyzer.py in verify mode to check letter and text alignment | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The single most important step: identify what physical process the problem describes. In quantitative biology, almost every problem maps to one of these:
Once you name the process, the mathematical structure follows. Solve algebraically first, substitute numbers second, and always check that units cancel correctly and the magnitude is physically reasonable.
These are not formulas. They are ways of thinking about what is happening physically.
Something is being spread into a larger volume, or two streams are mixing. The total amount of substance is conserved. Think: amount_before = amount_after, where amount = concentration x volume. This covers serial dilutions, mixing streams, stock solution preparation, and environmental discharge into rivers.
Something is disappearing (or growing) at a rate proportional to how much is currently there. The signature: "half-life" or "doubling time" appears in the problem. This single pattern covers drug clearance, radioactive decay, environmental persistence, bacterial growth, and epidemic doubling. The only things that change between applications are the rate constant and what is decaying.
Something binds to a limited number of sites. At low concentrations, binding is proportional to concentration. At high concentrations, sites fill up and adding more has diminishing effect. This covers receptor-ligand binding, enzyme kinetics, surface adsorption, and oxygen-hemoglobin curves. The shape is always hyperbolic: response = max_response x [thing] / ([thing] + half_max_constant).
"At what point does X equal Y?" or "When does the concentration drop below the therapeutic level?" Set two expressions equal and solve. Examples: time to reach a target drug level, when an environmental concentration exceeds a safety limit, herd immunity threshold (where effective R drops to 1).
Output = input x time, or output = concentration x flow rate. Clearance, flux, dosing rate, and drip rate calculations are all just dimensional analysis: arrange the given quantities so the units work out.
Two groups are being compared. You need a measure of difference (Fst, odds ratio, relative risk) and a measure of whether the difference is real (p-value, confidence interval). Think: what is the effect size, and is it distinguishable from noise?
test cases passed, vs 9 / 21 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.