Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Parallel generation through skeleton-first approach for 2x speedup
.claude/skills/miosa-osa-skeleton-of-thought/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -17% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -22% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -27% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -20% | 0% |
Achieves up to 2x speedup through parallel content generation.
Instead of sequential generation, SoT:
Given question, generate ONLY the skeleton outline:
- Point 1: [brief description]
- Point 2: [brief description]
- Point 3: [brief description]
...
Do NOT expand. Just the skeleton.Launch parallel expansions for each point:
Point 1 → Agent 1 → Expanded content
Point 2 → Agent 2 → Expanded content
Point 3 → Agent 3 → Expanded content
(all run simultaneously)Combine expanded points with transitions:
[Introduction]
[Point 1 expanded]
[Transition]
[Point 2 expanded]
[Transition]
[Point 3 expanded]
[Conclusion]python# Skeleton generation prompt SKELETON_PROMPT = """ For the question: {question} Generate ONLY a skeleton outline with 3-8 key points. Format: 1. [Point]: [5-10 word description] 2. [Point]: [5-10 word description] ... Do NOT expand the points. ONLY the skeleton. """ # Point expansion prompt EXPAND_PROMPT = """ Context: Answering "{question}" Skeleton: {skeleton} Expand ONLY point {point_number}: "{point_description}" Write 2-4 sentences expanding this point. Do not include other points. """
| Query Type | Sequential Time | SoT Time | Speedup | |------------|-----------------|----------|---------| | Tutorial | 10s | 5s | 2.0x | | Explanation| 8s | 4.5s | 1.8x | | List-based | 12s | 6s | 2.0x | | Analysis | 15s | 9s | 1.7x |
Reference: "Skeleton-of-Thought: Large Language Models Can Do Parallel Decoding" (2023)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→pass | 12,887 | 6,867 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,213 | 1,838 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 9,186 | 8,158 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,567 | 2,022 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 11,535 | 3,933 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,789 | 1,397 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 39,684 | 26,470 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,247 | 5,744 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 46,582 | 26,820 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,238 | 5,300 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 45,656 | 32,242 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,239 | 6,088 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,569 | 9,208 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,359 | 2,860 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 20,779 | 15,385 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,845 | 2,964 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 31,373 | 35,757 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,463 | 6,715 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 3,204 | 2,651 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 401 | 1,052 | +162% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 9,065 | 2,524 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,496 | 1,128 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 11,299 | 9,145 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,872 | 2,413 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 14,817 | 7,149 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,647 | 1,994 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 16,921 | 15,766 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,719 | 3,303 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 11,226 | 4,262 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,854 | 1,358 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,644 | 10,965 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,369 | 2,590 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 11,259 | 9,161 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,705 | 2,212 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 19,602 | 16,477 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,099 | 3,502 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 25,979 | 3,624 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,699 | 1,352 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 21,398 | 2,769 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,202 | 1,198 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 12,723 | 2,155 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,285 | 1,092 | -52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 12,436 | 1,877 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,124 | 995 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 14,898 | 8,077 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,399 | 2,009 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 13,562 | 8,225 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,143 | 1,994 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 6,558 | 5,081 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,102 | 1,562 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-26 | fail→pass | 9,365 | 2,027 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,477 | 1,065 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-27 | fail→pass | 9,353 | 3,624 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,531 | 1,295 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 27 cases were attempted, and 25 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +37 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.