When the user needs to design an interview process, create interview questions, build scorecards, calibrate interviewers, or evaluate candidates for a role.
SkillScore64Maintained
Automatic
◆Recruiting pack
Last verified 8/21/2026
What it changes
Passed 14 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 22 without it.
Without skill36%
With skill64%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
caps the take-home project duration at 2 to 4 hours maximum
explicitly shares the evaluation rubric with the candidate upfront
includes customer empathy in the product manager competency matrix
and 4 more in the full report
6 fixed8 passed either way8 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+27 pp
Tokens
+75%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
+13%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/21/2026v114 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 6
Prompt
We want to give candidates for a Mid-level DevOps Engineer role a realistic 2-day weekend take-home project to build a full infrastructure deployment pipeline. Draft the assessment specification, rubric, and interview stage plan.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
caps the take-home project duration at 2 to 4 hours maximum
Missed
Passed
requires a live walkthrough round to review the completed assessment
Passed
Passed
case-04 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/21/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md134 linessingle file
Interview Kit
When to Use
Designing a structured interview loop for a specific role and level
Creating standardized question banks organized by interview round type
Building scoring rubrics for consistent candidate evaluation across interviewers
Reducing interviewer bias with process controls and calibration
Turning a job description into a repeatable evaluation process
Calibrating interview panels after quarterly hiring outcome reviews
Context Required
From startup-context: Company stage, team size, engineering culture, current interview process (if any), hiring velocity
From user: Role title, level (junior/mid/senior/staff), key competencies to evaluate, number of interview rounds the team can support, whether a take-home or live exercise is preferred
Workflow
Define competencies — Extract 4-6 core competencies from the job description. Split into technical skills, domain knowledge, collaboration traits, and startup-fit signals. Each competency must be evaluable with observable evidence.
Design the interview loop — Map competencies to interview stages with explicit, non-overlapping objectives per round. Typical startup loop: recruiter/founder screen, technical assessment, team interview, values interview. Assign timing and interviewers to each stage.
Write structured questions — For each stage, write 3-5 primary questions with follow-up probes. Every question must map to a specific competency. Include "what good looks like" answer guidance so interviewers know what signal they are looking for.
Build scorecards — Create a 1-4 rating scale (not 1-5 — it creates a "3 means fine" dead zone). Define behavioral anchors at each level specific to the role. Interviewers must score independently before the debrief.
Design take-home or live exercise — If applicable, create a practical assessment that mirrors real work. Time-cap it (2-4 hours max), share the evaluation rubric with the candidate upfront, and always follow up with a live walkthrough.
Add anti-bias guardrails — Require structured debrief instructions, independent scoring protocol, and a checklist of common bias traps. Every candidate for the same role gets the same core questions in the same order.
Plan calibration cadence — Set quarterly recalibration using hiring outcome data. Review whether loop design still surfaces the right signals based on quality-of-hire metrics.
Output Format
A complete interview kit document containing:
Role summary and competency matrix (4-6 competencies with definitions)