Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →OHDSI (Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics) OMOP Common Data Model. Tools for converting EHR data to OMOP CDM, running cohort analyses, and population-level estimation. Standard for observational research.
.claude/skills/mkurman-omop-ohdsi/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -59% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 4% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -49% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -25% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -6% | 0% |
OHDSI (Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics) provides tools for converting EHR data to the OMOP Common Data Model, running cohort analyses, and population-level estimation. Standard for real-world evidence research.
bashuv pip install ohdsi-feature-extraction
python# Using the OHDSI Python API from ohdsi_database_connector import DatabaseConnector connection_details = { "dbms": "postgresql", "server": "localhost/omop_cdm", "user": "ohdsi", "password": "your_password", } conn = DatabaseConnector(connectionDetails=connection_details) # Run a cohort SQL query sql = "SELECT person_id, condition_concept_id, condition_start_date FROM condition_occurrence" results = conn.querySql(sql)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 17,609 | 5,835 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,408 | 1,395 | -59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 14,965 | 13,368 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,773 | 2,888 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 11,801 | 3,953 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,024 | 1,024 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 10,960 | 8,243 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,719 | 1,768 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 7,201 | 6,571 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,169 | 1,391 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 10,105 | 8,150 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,600 | 1,674 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 7,241 | 8,324 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,063 | 1,733 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 4,608 | 3,208 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 724 | 790 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 14,107 | 7,899 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,248 | 1,662 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 10,741 | 6,805 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,693 | 1,419 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 10,017 | 10,126 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,665 | 2,024 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 4,506 | 3,330 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 760 | 928 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 12,257 | 6,817 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,120 | 1,586 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 6,285 | 5,162 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,196 | 1,274 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 14,722 | 13,905 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,302 | 2,645 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 10,196 | 10,248 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,753 | 2,067 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 10,233 | 5,968 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,756 | 1,358 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 4,528 | 3,730 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 645 | 914 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 11,405 | 7,199 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,744 | 1,428 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 9,171 | 6,030 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,664 | 1,438 | -14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 17,291 | 14,825 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,476 | 3,255 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 10,672 | 9,134 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,168 | 2,181 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 7,850 | 4,240 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,310 | 1,090 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.