Figure out which AI tool actually fits the task in front of you — chatbot, coding assistant, image model, agent, or none — instead of forcing one tool onto everything.
NewMaintained
Automatic
◆Personal Assistant pack
Last verified 8/30/2026
What it changes
Passed 11 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 22 without it.
Without skill59%
With skill50%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
The Right category field is classified as image
The Task shape field is classified as automation
The Right category field is classified as automation
and 3 more in the full report
4 fixed7 passed either way5 still failing6 broke
Pass-rate lift
-9 pp
Tokens
+32%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-5%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/30/2026v111 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 4
Prompt
I want to automate sending personalized follow-up emails to prospective consulting clients after initial sales calls. My budget is under $30/month, privacy is critical because client details are sensitive, and it must integrate with Gmail and Google Sheets, which I already use. This is a recurring, medium-stakes task. Can you help me select the right tool? Please categorize the task shape, tell me the best tool category, outline the key trade-offs that matter for my constraints, suggest a shortlist of options, let me know if a non-AI method is actually better, and suggest a cheap way to test this setup first.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
The response includes the header block format starting with '### Tool for:'
Missed
Passed
The Task shape field is classified as automation
Missed
Passed
The Right category field is classified as automation
Missed
Passed
case-01 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/30/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md59 linessingle file
AI-Tool Picker
Most people reach for the one AI tool they know and force every task through it — or freeze because there are a hundred options and endless hype. The right question isn't "what's the best AI tool," it's "what kind of tool fits this task." This matches your task to the right category of AI (or none), names the trade-offs that actually matter for your case, and shows how to try it cheaply — so you choose by fit, not by marketing.
What This Skill Produces
The task-to-tool match — which category of tool fits (conversational assistant, coding assistant, image/video model, research agent, automation, specialized app) and why
The trade-offs that matter for you — the 2–3 dimensions that actually decide it for this task (accuracy, privacy, cost, speed, integration), not a generic feature grid
The "you don't need AI for this" call — when a non-AI tool or plain human effort is genuinely the better answer
A cheap way to try it — how to test the fit with a free tier or a small task before committing time or money
A shortlist, not a lecture — a couple of concrete options in the right category, chosen for your constraints
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
The task — what you're actually trying to get done
Your constraints — budget, privacy needs, where it has to fit (a workflow, a tool you already use)
Your current tools — what you already have access to (often the answer's already in your pocket)
The stakes — one-off vs recurring, low-stakes vs must-be-right
Framework: Fit The Task, Not The Hype
Name the task shape. Is it generation, transformation, research, decision support, or automation? The shape points to the tool category far better than brand names do.
Pick the category first. Match the shape to a kind of tool (assistant, coding, image, agent, specialized) before naming any product — categories are stable, products churn.
Find the 2–3 deciding trade-offs. For this specific task, what actually decides it — accuracy, privacy, cost, speed, integration? Ignore the dimensions that don't matter here.
Check if AI is even the answer. Some tasks are better done by a non-AI tool, a template, or ten minutes of human effort — say so when it's true.
Recommend a cheap test. Suggest trying the fit on a small real task via a free tier before investing — fit is revealed by use, not spec sheets.
Output Format
Tool for: [the task]
Task shape: [generation / transformation / research / decision support / automation].
Right category: [conversational assistant / coding / image / research agent / automation / specialized] — because [reason].
Deciding trade-offs for you: [the 2–3 that actually matter here].
Shortlist: [a couple concrete options in that category, fit to your constraints].
Or skip AI: [when a non-AI tool / human effort is the better call — if applicable].
Try it cheaply: [free tier / small test task before committing].
Build an all-hands that lands with everyone from intern to VP — the mixed-altitude structure (the story for all, the numbers for some), the wins-with-names section done right, the hard-news slide handled straight, and the Q&A design that gets real questions. Use when asked build the all-hands deck, make the monthly town hall not boring, how do we share the numbers with everyone, or announce this change at all-hands. Produces the segment structure, the altitude-mixed content rules, the hard-news