Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mohitagw15856/brand-impersonation-response
Respond to a brand or executive impersonation incident — deepfaked executives, cloned support lines, fake apps, spoofed domains, or AI-generated scam content wearing your name.
Passed 15 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
6 fixed9 passed either way7 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
A fake cryptocurrency giveaway site and associated Telegram channel are actively using AI voice clips of our CEO to trick users into depositing funds. We've received about 15 customer reports so far. Please generate a full brand impersonation response plan for us. We need a verification and evidence preservation summary, a takedown tracking log detailing target platforms and escalation steps, drafted messaging for affected users, support teams, and the CEO, our official 'never-ask' anchor statement, and a follow-up hardening plan.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response begins with a header structured as ### Impersonation Response: [what's circulating] — [date] | Missed | Passed |
| The takedown log table contains columns Target, Channel used, Filed, Status, and Escalation path | Missed | Passed |
| The public statement is gated on reaching a specific quantitative or qualitative threshold before publication | Missed | Passed |
| The hardening plan includes an internal callback protocol for voice or fund transfer requests | Missed | Passed |
| The hardening plan assigns explicit operational owners and completion dates | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Cheap generative tools made impersonation an industrial product: a CEO deepfake pushing a token, a cloned support line harvesting card numbers, a spoofed checkout collecting credentials. The attack isn't on your systems — it's on your customers' trust, using your face. Speed and sequencing decide the damage; this skill runs both.
Ask for (if not already provided):
Phase 1 — Verify and preserve (first hours). Confirm fabrication with the impersonated party directly (deepfakes are good; "that's obviously fake" is not a verification method). Preserve everything before takedowns delete the evidence: URLs, hashes, screen recordings, WHOIS, wallet addresses, timestamps — the takedown kills the scam, the evidence supports fraud referrals and platform escalation. Quietly assess reach; do not publicly respond yet — a statement about a 400-view scam gives it 40,000.
Phase 2 — Contain (same day). Takedowns in parallel, sequenced by harm-per-hour:
Phase 3 — Communicate (as reach demands). The proportionality rule: warn the targeted, inform the asking, broadcast only when reach forces it.
Phase 4 — Harden (the week after).
test cases passed, vs 9 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.