Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mohitagw15856/budget-variance-analysis
Produce a structured budget variance analysis from actual vs budget figures.
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 22 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
5 fixed16 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Here are our Q3 figures vs budget for our UK division: - Revenue: Budget £1.2M, Actual £1.05M - Cost of Sales: Budget £500k, Actual £480k - Operating Expenses: Budget £350k, Actual £410k Our materiality threshold is £20k. Context: enterprise deal closures slipped into Q4 and software renewals came in higher than planned. Target audience is the CFO. Please prepare a report containing a clear variance summary grid, detailed commentary for significant line items, a priority ranking of top variances, updated full-year forecast expectations, and a short executive summary suitable for a board meeting.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response places the Executive Summary as section 5 at the end of the report. | Missed | Passed |
| The summary table includes a column specifically titled F/A for variance direction. | Missed | Passed |
| The commentary for each material variance explicitly includes a sub-field or heading for Management action. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Produces a complete variance analysis from numbers through to root cause explanation and management commentary.
| Line Item | Budget | Actual | Variance £ | Variance % | F/A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | |||||
| Cost of Sales | |||||
| Gross Profit | |||||
| Opex | |||||
| EBITDA |
F = Favourable | A = Adverse
For each variance above threshold:
[Line item] — £[amount] F/A ([%])
Ranked by materiality and strategic significance.
Does the full-year forecast need updating? State revised expectation and key assumptions.
test cases passed, vs 16 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.