Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mohitagw15856/candidate-scorecard
Turn interview notes into a structured candidate scorecard and hire recommendation.
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
7 fixed10 passed either way3 still failing2 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Evaluate candidate Taylor Swift for Data Engineer. Target competencies were SQL optimization, ETL architecture, and Stakeholder Communication. Interviewer notes: 'Taylor explained partitioning and indexing strategies clearly, demonstrating strong SQL knowledge. ETL pipeline discussion showed solid experience with Airflow.' Scale 1-4. Please output the structured candidate scorecard summary and table.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Marks Stakeholder Communication as Not assessed in the competency table | Missed | Passed |
| Avoids assigning a numerical rating score to Stakeholder Communication | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A scorecard converts a fuzzy "I liked them" into an evidence-based, comparable evaluation. It rates the
candidate against the same competencies the role defined, ties each rating to specific evidence from the
interview, and lands a clear recommendation — so debriefs are about evidence, not who argues hardest. (For the
role's question set and competencies, pair with interview-question-bank.)
Given rough interview notes, produce the full scorecard anyway — organize the evidence under the relevant competencies and give a rating + recommendation, marking where evidence is thin (low confidence / probe next round). Never invent things the candidate said; if a competency wasn't assessed, say so rather than guessing.
Ask for these only if they aren't already provided (else mark as not assessed):
| Competency | Rating | Evidence (what they said/did) | Concern / gap |
|---|
Mark any competency you couldn't assess as Not assessed.
test cases passed, vs 12 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.