Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Produce a structured competitive analysis for any product or market. Use when asked for a competitor analysis, competitive teardown, market comparison, SWOT, or positioning map. Generates a structured teardown with positioning map, feature comparison, messaging gaps, and strategic recommendations. For a full landscape doc with feature matrix and win/loss analysis use competitive-analysis instead.
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-competitor-teardown/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -2% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 15% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 76% | 0% |
Este skill produce un documento de análisis competitivo completo — estructurado para usar en decks de estrategia, materiales para inversores, habilitación de ventas, o sesiones de planificación de producto.
Solicita estos datos al usuario si no se proporcionan:
references/intel-sourcing-guide.md — de dónde provienen los datos competitivos (cuatro niveles de fuentes), qué fuente usar por sección de desglose, las etiquetas de confianza verificado]/reportado]/asumido], y la línea ética. Aplica su etiquetado a cada afirmación sustancial en la salida.templates/teardown-skeleton.md — un desglose relleno con las etiquetas de confianza y una cola de verificación integrada. Ofrécelo cuando el usuario quiera reunir la información por sí mismo.Un párrafo que resuma la dinámica del mercado: quiénes son los actores clave, cómo está segmentado el mercado y dónde se encuentra el espacio en blanco. Mantenlo bajo 150 palabras — es el resumen ejecutivo.
Describe un mapa de posicionamiento 2x2 en forma de texto (ya que no puedes renderizar imágenes):
| Característica / Capacidad | Tu Producto] | Competidor A] | Competidor B] | Competidor C] | |---|---|---|---|---| | Característica] | ✅ / ❌ / 🟡 Parcial | | | |
Usa ✅ (la tiene), ❌ (no la tiene), 🟡 (parcial/limitada). Añade una columna "Notas Estratégicas" para características donde la diferencia es un punto de venta significativo o un riesgo.
Incluye 10–15 filas. Si el usuario no ha proporcionado detalles de características, nota qué celdas necesitan ser verificadas.
Para cada competidor, analiza su mensajería orientada al público (titular del sitio web, eslogan, propuesta de valor principal):
Nombre del Competidor]
Produce un SWOT limpio para el producto del usuario en el contexto de este panorama competitivo:
3–5 recomendaciones accionables basadas en el análisis. Enmarca cada una como: "Dado observación], tu producto] debería acción] para resultado]."
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 28,969 | 17,697 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,942 | 4,847 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 23,504 | 26,385 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,169 | 6,024 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 33,394 | 22,549 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,649 | 5,236 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 27,598 | 22,186 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,331 | 5,504 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 8,598 | 9,569 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,555 | 2,828 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 16,163 | 19,873 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,935 | 4,685 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→fail | 18,997 | 8,721 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,201 | 2,799 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 17,741 | 14,908 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,304 | 3,811 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 9,522 | 12,362 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,979 | 3,488 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 11,697 | 18,125 | +55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,835 | 4,287 | +134% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 14,997 | 17,705 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,617 | 4,214 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 19,927 | 19,972 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,191 | 4,520 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 17,093 | 12,364 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,768 | 3,118 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 6,432 | 6,436 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 944 | 2,282 | +142% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 13,412 | 20,919 | +56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,167 | 4,748 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 9,246 | 11,980 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,348 | 3,175 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 19,497 | 18,934 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,259 | 4,340 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 9,612 | 23,343 | +143% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,790 | 5,358 | +199% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 2,091 | 9,768 | +367% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 277 | 2,820 | +918% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,814 | 25,468 | +99% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,082 | 5,403 | +160% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 20,066 | 19,974 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,122 | 4,645 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 16,190 | 15,274 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,901 | 4,162 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 11,749 | 18,117 | +54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,284 | 4,815 | +111% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +48 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.