Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Plan what happens to your digital life when you die — accounts, photos, passwords, money, and social profiles — so someone you trust can actually find, access, memorialize, or close them without a legal nightmare. Use when someone says 'what happens to my accounts when I die', 'digital legacy', 'help my family access my stuff if something happens', or is doing estate planning and forgot the online half. Produces a digital asset inventory, an access plan using built-in legacy tools, and instructi
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-digital-death-plan/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -9% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -4% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 68% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 61% | 0% |
Your life is mostly online now, and none of it is in your will. When someone dies, their family routinely loses irreplaceable photos, can't close accounts that keep billing, gets locked out of email (which is the master key to everything), and spends months fighting platform bureaucracy — all avoidable with an afternoon of planning while alive. This skill builds that plan: inventory the digital assets that matter, set up the legitimate access routes (the built-in legacy features, not password-sharing that violates terms and breaks on death), and write your trusted person clear instructions so grief isn't compounded by a login wall.
each — memorialize, transfer, download-then-close, or delete — with the sentimental and the financial both covered
tools (the ones that actually survive death), where credentials live (a password manager's emergency access, not a sticky note), and what your executor is legally entitled to
exists, where the keys are, and what you want done — findable, not buried
money, the irreplaceable photos, and the ones you'd want closed for privacy
Ask for (if not already provided):
crypto, subscriptions, domains/websites, gaming, anything with money or memories
gets the photos? anything to be closed privately without others seeing?
reset almost everything else, so it's the highest-priority and highest-risk asset. Plan its access first (legacy contact / emergency access), and note that this power is exactly why it must go to the right person.
(socials with a legacy-contact feature), transfer (photos, domains, money), download-then-close (subscriptions, most services), or delete (privacy). The outcome dictates the mechanism.
built-in ones — major platforms have legacy-contact / inactive-account / memorial processes, and a good password manager has emergency-access delegation. Sharing raw passwords often violates terms, breaks when passwords rotate, and can create legal ambiguity. The plan uses what's designed to survive death, and flags that an executor's legal access rights vary by place (verify-local).
accounts that quietly keep billing a dead person, and irreplaceable photos lost behind a login. Flag both explicitly — what has real value, what recurs, what can never be recovered — so they get handled first. Crypto especially: no seed phrase, no recovery, ever.
is no plan. The letter to your person: what exists, where the keys are (the password manager, the emergency-access setup, the safe), what you want done with each category, and where THIS document lives — stored with your will or told to the executor, never left only on the device that's now locked.
## Digital asset inventory
| Account/asset | Has money? | Irreplaceable? | Desired outcome | Access mechanism |
## Access plan (legitimate rails)
Email (master key): [legacy/emergency access setup] · Password manager emergency
access: … · Platform legacy tools to set up now: … · Executor's legal access:
[verify-local]
## Protect first
[Recurring charges to stop · real money (incl. crypto — seed phrase!) · the photos]
## Letter to your person (draft)
[What exists · where the keys are · what to do with each category · where this plan lives]
## Set up this week
[The 3-4 legacy/emergency-access features to actually switch on now]"share the password"
photos are called out for first handling
is specified (not on the locked device)
noted this pairs with — doesn't replace — a will
often violates terms, and creates legal mess; use legacy tools and emergency access
and route to a will/solicitor; this is the digital companion to that, not a substitute
whole point
user may want closed privately; honor per-category wishes
legacy-letter]] for the emotional message that rides alongside; grief-admin]] is what your people will be doing — this makes it survivable; estate-planning-kit]] for the will this plugs into; password]] hygiene now makes all of this easier.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 37,304 | 22,990 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,503 | 4,120 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 30,247 | 25,410 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,030 | 4,545 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 37,276 | 29,205 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,811 | 4,603 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 18,496 | 22,292 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,116 | 4,139 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 21,025 | 27,914 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,846 | 5,233 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 17,599 | 25,966 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,889 | 4,083 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 20,199 | 23,755 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,323 | 3,902 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 25,212 | 20,607 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,094 | 4,610 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 23,953 | 28,377 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,884 | 4,650 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 21,861 | 21,704 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,621 | 4,466 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,130 | 17,921 | +27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,309 | 4,201 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,347 | 9,988 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,400 | 2,981 | +113% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 22,155 | 26,937 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,693 | 4,898 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 15,217 | 20,272 | +33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,605 | 3,740 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 20,061 | 18,062 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,424 | 4,104 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 19,244 | 18,551 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,294 | 3,424 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 17,085 | 18,269 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,757 | 3,028 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 19,632 | 21,385 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,405 | 3,654 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 15,124 | 20,794 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,669 | 4,014 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 22,864 | 25,063 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,600 | 4,185 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 23,031 | 23,235 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,744 | 4,139 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 22,975 | 25,308 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,682 | 4,298 | +60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 15,050 | 21,828 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,403 | 3,865 | +175% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | 20,881 | 19,272 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,314 | 3,388 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 15,415 | 16,426 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,512 | 3,000 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +20 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.