Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Write an executive summary for any document, report, or proposal. Use when asked to write an executive summary, management summary, briefing paper, or one-pager for senior stakeholders. Produces a structured summary that busy executives can read in under 3 minutes and act on.
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-executive-summary/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 18% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 86% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 13% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 69% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
Redacta resúmenes ejecutivos que los responsables de decisiones realmente leen — con las conclusiones al frente, estructurados para ser leídos por encima, implacable en qué incluir.
Un resumen ejecutivo NO es un resumen del documento. Es un documento independiente que:
Resumen Ejecutivo Preparado para: [Audiencia] | Fecha: [Fecha] | Autor: [Nombre]
Lo más importante en primer lugar: Lo más importante. La recomendación o hallazgo. 2-3 frases. Un lector que solo lea esto debe saber qué le estás pidiendo o diciéndole.]
Contexto (por qué es importante): 2-3 frases. Contexto mínimo para entender lo más importante. No el historial — solo lo que el lector necesita ahora.]
Hallazgos clave / análisis:
Opciones consideradas: (incluye solo si se presenta una decisión)
| Opción | Beneficio | Riesgo | Recomendación | |---|---|---|---| | Opción A] | Beneficio] | Riesgo] | Recomendada | | Opción B] | Beneficio] | Riesgo] | No recomendada |
Recomendación: Específica. "Recomendamos acción] porque motivo]. Esto resultará en resultado]." No "sugerimos considerar opciones".]
Próximos pasos inmediatos:
Riesgos de la inacción: Qué sucede si el lector no hace nada]
Informe completo: Referencia a dónde se puede encontrar el documento completo]
CEO/MD: Comienza con impacto financiero o estratégico. 1 página. Haz la decisión binaria. Pregunta en la primera frase. Junta directiva: Comienza con gobernanza o riesgo. Enmarca contra objetivos organizacionales. Expresa específicamente qué necesitas de ellos. Inversor: Comienza con retorno u oportunidad. Números específicos. 1 página. Anticipa "por qué ahora". Ministro/sector público de alto nivel: Comienza con beneficio público o alineación de políticas. Incluye marco de coste-beneficio. Cliente: Comienza con su problema. Demuestra que entiendes antes de presentar la recomendación.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | pass→pass | 17,084 | 11,315 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,774 | 2,726 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 14,449 | 11,135 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,733 | 3,225 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 11,531 | 13,245 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,917 | 3,560 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 15,911 | 11,865 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,610 | 2,947 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 10,546 | 12,529 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,705 | 3,141 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 15,360 | 10,814 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,471 | 2,767 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 17,063 | 10,409 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,577 | 2,576 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→fail | 12,381 | 12,908 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,775 | 3,036 | +71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 14,370 | 16,769 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,214 | 3,731 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 14,695 | 12,921 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,464 | 3,206 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,122 | 14,619 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,008 | 3,502 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 14,471 | 12,203 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,360 | 3,000 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 14,890 | 15,075 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,238 | 3,638 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 10,490 | 10,965 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,804 | 2,959 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 12,245 | 13,354 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,885 | 3,124 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,302 | 12,485 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,182 | 3,197 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,699 | 10,388 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,430 | 2,730 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 13,610 | 11,787 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,106 | 2,885 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 21,420 | 8,391 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,535 | 2,464 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 31,417 | 26,067 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,180 | 6,090 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 23,327 | 21,782 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,852 | 4,497 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→fail | 37,768 | 35,232 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,184 | 7,286 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 4 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.