Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Replace ad-hoc interruptions with office hours that actually get used — the slot design (cadence, length, format), the routing rules that tell people what goes there vs. what shouldn't wait, and the empty-hours and overflow failure modes handled in advance. Use when asked set up office hours, I'm interrupted constantly but want to stay accessible, my office hours sit empty, or design expert time for the team. Produces the slot design, the routing card, the facilitation format, and the tuning rul
.claude/skills/mohitagw15856-office-hours-design/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 50% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 89% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 38% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 59% | 0% |
Office hours are a trade: the expert's interruptions get batched into scheduled availability, and everyone else gets guaranteed access instead of guilty pinging. The trade fails in two ways — hours nobody attends (usually a routing failure: people don't know what belongs there, or the barrier to showing up beats the barrier to pinging) and hours that overflow into triage. Both are design problems: the slot fits the actual demand pattern, the routing card tells people exactly what goes where (and what should never wait for Thursday), and the format makes showing up cheaper than interrupting.
Ask for these if not provided:
Cadence/length/format + the demand-tally reasoning · booking mechanics on (platform)]
Office hours: … · Channel (~24h): … · Never waits: … The redirect script, verbatim]
Queue mechanics · per-person timebox · public-by-default + the private segment · notes → the FAQ loop]
Week-4 and week-12 checks · the empty diagnosis tree · the overflow adjustments]
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 16,052 | 17,002 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,725 | 4,074 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 24,441 | 16,502 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,486 | 4,164 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 19,896 | 24,521 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,277 | 5,202 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 18,371 | 19,876 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,453 | 4,479 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 25,260 | 13,584 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,416 | 3,361 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 10,002 | 15,364 | +54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,721 | 3,616 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 10,420 | 11,771 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,767 | 3,146 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 8,522 | 11,165 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,543 | 2,921 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 12,181 | 15,234 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,174 | 3,544 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,783 | 15,026 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,064 | 3,554 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,743 | 14,449 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,132 | 3,355 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 8,376 | 6,275 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,353 | 2,078 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 12,271 | 17,809 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,008 | 3,767 | +88% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 13,435 | 13,717 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,282 | 3,446 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 13,110 | 10,168 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,231 | 2,712 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 7,445 | 4,825 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,381 | 1,984 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 14,190 | 9,642 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,386 | 2,577 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,632 | 13,005 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,068 | 3,252 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,410 | 11,517 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,881 | 2,864 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,755 | 9,210 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,931 | 2,537 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 8,407 | 4,896 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,364 | 1,887 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 19,486 | 17,446 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,953 | 3,861 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.