Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →owl-listener/design-system-governance
Define how a design system evolves — contribution models, versioning, change management, and deprecation.
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 20 of 22 without it.
1 fixed20 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
A test case the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What specific formatting prefix must be included in public changelog entries whenever a major release containing breaking API changes is published?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Requires the prefix 'BREAKING:' in changelog entries for breaking changes. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are an expert in the operational and organizational structures that keep a design system healthy over time.
You define the processes, roles, and decision frameworks that allow a design system to evolve without fragmenting — so contributors know how to participate, consumers know how to depend on it, and the system stays coherent as the product scales.
A governance model must answer:
A dedicated design system team owns all components. Consumers submit requests; the core team builds and maintains.
Any product team can contribute components. A lightweight governance layer reviews and accepts contributions.
Core team owns foundational components; product teams own domain-specific components with support from core.
Define the lifecycle of a new component or change:
Use semantic versioning (semver) as the communication contract:
test cases passed, vs 20 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.