Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Performing comprehensive security assessments of Google Cloud Platform environments using Forseti Security, Security Command Center, and gcloud CLI to audit IAM policies, firewall rules, storage permissions, and compliance against CIS GCP Foundations Benchmark.
.claude/skills/performing-gcp-security-assessment-with-forseti/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Do not use as a replacement for GCP Security Command Center Premium for real-time threat detection, for application-level vulnerability scanning (use Web Security Scanner), or for GKE-specific security (use GKE Security Posture).
roles/securitycenter.admin, roles/iam.securityReviewer)pip install scoutsuite)Enable SCC and set up Cloud Asset Inventory for comprehensive resource visibility.
bash# Enable Security Command Center API gcloud services enable securitycenter.googleapis.com \ --project=PROJECT_ID # Enable Cloud Asset API gcloud services enable cloudasset.googleapis.com \ --project=PROJECT_ID # List all assets in the organization gcloud asset search-all-resources \ --scope=organizations/ORG_ID \ --asset-types="compute.googleapis.com/Instance,storage.googleapis.com/Bucket,iam.googleapis.com/ServiceAccount" \ --format="table(name, assetType, location, project)" # Export asset inventory to BigQuery for analysis gcloud asset export \ --organization=ORG_ID \ --output-bigquery-force \ --output-bigquery-dataset=projects/PROJECT_ID/datasets/asset_inventory \ --output-bigquery-table=resources \ --content-type=resource
Review IAM policies across the organization for overly permissive bindings, primitive roles, and service account misuse.
bash# List all IAM policy bindings at org level gcloud organizations get-iam-policy ORG_ID \ --format=json > org-iam-policy.json # Find all users with Owner or Editor roles across projects gcloud asset search-all-iam-policies \ --scope=organizations/ORG_ID \ --query="policy:roles/owner OR policy:roles/editor" \ --format="table(resource, policy.bindings.role, policy.bindings.members)" # Identify service accounts with admin roles gcloud asset search-all-iam-policies \ --scope=organizations/ORG_ID \ --query="policy.bindings.members:serviceAccount AND policy:roles/owner" \ --format=json # Check for allUsers or allAuthenticatedUsers bindings (public access) gcloud asset search-all-iam-policies \ --scope=organizations/ORG_ID \ --query="policy:allUsers OR policy:allAuthenticatedUsers" \ --format="table(resource, policy.bindings.role, policy.bindings.members)" # List service account keys older than 90 days gcloud iam service-accounts keys list \ --iam-account=SA_EMAIL \ --managed-by=user \ --format="table(name,validAfterTime,validBeforeTime)"
Audit VPC firewall rules for overly permissive ingress rules, missing logging, and network exposure.
bash# List all firewall rules allowing ingress from 0.0.0.0/0 gcloud compute firewall-rules list \ --filter="direction=INGRESS AND sourceRanges=0.0.0.0/0" \ --format="table(name, network, allowed, sourceRanges, targetTags)" # Find firewall rules allowing all protocols/ports gcloud compute firewall-rules list \ --filter="direction=INGRESS AND allowed[].IPProtocol=all" \ --format="table(name, network, sourceRanges, targetTags)" # Check for SSH (22) and RDP (3389) open to internet gcloud compute firewall-rules list \ --filter="direction=INGRESS AND sourceRanges=0.0.0.0/0 AND (allowed[].ports=22 OR allowed[].ports=3389)" \ --format="table(name, network, allowed, sourceRanges)" # Audit VPC flow log configuration gcloud compute networks subnets list \ --format="table(name, region, enableFlowLogs, logConfig.aggregationInterval)"
Check for publicly accessible storage buckets and missing encryption configurations.
bash# List all buckets in a project gsutil ls -p PROJECT_ID # Check bucket IAM for public access for bucket in $(gsutil ls -p PROJECT_ID); do echo "=== $bucket ===" gsutil iam get "$bucket" | grep -E "allUsers|allAuthenticatedUsers" && \ echo " WARNING: PUBLIC ACCESS DETECTED" || \ echo " OK: No public access" done # Check bucket encryption configuration for bucket in $(gsutil ls -p PROJECT_ID); do echo "=== $bucket ===" gsutil kms encryption "$bucket" 2>/dev/null || echo " Using Google-managed encryption" done # Check uniform bucket-level access enforcement for bucket in $(gsutil ls -p PROJECT_ID); do gsutil uniformbucketlevelaccess get "$bucket" done
Execute ScoutSuite for an automated multi-check security assessment of the GCP environment.
bash# Run ScoutSuite against GCP python3 -m ScoutSuite gcp \ --user-account \ --all-projects \ --report-dir ./scoutsuite-gcp-report # Run with service account credentials python3 -m ScoutSuite gcp \ --service-account /path/to/service-account-key.json \ --all-projects \ --report-dir ./scoutsuite-gcp-report # Open the HTML report open ./scoutsuite-gcp-report/gcp-report.html
Retrieve and analyze SCC findings for vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and threats.
bash# List active SCC findings gcloud scc findings list ORG_ID \ --filter="state=\"ACTIVE\" AND severity=\"CRITICAL\"" \ --format="table(finding.category, finding.severity, finding.resourceName, finding.eventTime)" # List findings by category gcloud scc findings list ORG_ID \ --filter="state=\"ACTIVE\" AND category=\"PUBLIC_BUCKET_ACL\"" \ --format=json # Get finding statistics grouped by category gcloud scc findings group ORG_ID \ --group-by="category" \ --filter="state=\"ACTIVE\"" # List compliance violations from SCC gcloud scc findings list ORG_ID \ --filter="state=\"ACTIVE\" AND sourceProperties.compliance_standard=\"CIS\"" \ --format="table(finding.category, finding.severity, finding.resourceName)"
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Security Command Center | GCP-native security and risk management platform that provides asset inventory, vulnerability detection, and threat monitoring | | Forseti Security | Open-source GCP security toolkit (now deprecated in favor of SCC) that provided inventory, scanning, enforcement, and notification capabilities | | Cloud Asset Inventory | GCP service that provides a complete inventory of cloud resources with metadata, IAM policies, and org policy configurations | | CIS GCP Foundations Benchmark | Security best practice guidelines from Center for Internet Security specific to Google Cloud Platform configuration | | Uniform Bucket-Level Access | GCP storage setting that disables legacy ACLs and enforces access exclusively through IAM policies for consistent access control | | Organization Policy | GCP constraint-based governance mechanism that restricts resource configurations across the organization hierarchy |
Context: After a company acquisition, the security team needs to assess the security posture of the acquired company's GCP organization with 30+ projects.
Approach:
gcloud asset search-all-iam-policies to find all Owner/Editor bindings and public access grants0.0.0.0/0gsutil iam getPitfalls: GCP IAM bindings are inherited from organization to folder to project. A permissive binding at the organization level affects all downstream projects. Always audit IAM at every level of the hierarchy, not just at the project level.
GCP Security Assessment Report
=================================
Organization: acme-acquired-org (ORG_ID: 123456789)
Projects Assessed: 34
Assessment Date: 2026-02-23
Standards: CIS GCP Foundations 2.0
IAM FINDINGS:
Users with Owner role at org level: 3
Service accounts with Editor role: 12
Resources with allUsers binding: 5
Service account keys > 90 days: 18
NETWORK FINDINGS:
Firewall rules allowing 0.0.0.0/0: 14
SSH open to internet: 7
RDP open to internet: 2
Subnets without VPC flow logs: 22
STORAGE FINDINGS:
Publicly accessible buckets: 5
Buckets without CMEK encryption: 28
Buckets without uniform access: 15
CRITICAL FINDINGS: 12
HIGH FINDINGS: 34
MEDIUM FINDINGS: 78
LOW FINDINGS: 145
TOP REMEDIATION PRIORITIES:
1. Remove allUsers bindings from 5 storage buckets (CRITICAL)
2. Restrict 0.0.0.0/0 firewall rules to specific CIDRs (HIGH)
3. Rotate 18 service account keys older than 90 days (HIGH)
4. Enable VPC flow logs on 22 subnets (MEDIUM)| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.