Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Enrich malware file hashes using the VirusTotal API to retrieve detection rates, behavioral analysis, YARA matches, and contextual threat intelligence for incident triage and IOC validation.
.claude/skills/performing-malware-hash-enrichment-with-virustotal/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-23 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-16 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
VirusTotal is the world's largest crowdsourced malware corpus, scanning files with 70+ antivirus engines and providing behavioral analysis, YARA rule matches, network indicators, and community intelligence. This skill covers using the VirusTotal API v3 to enrich file hashes (MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256) with detection verdicts, sandbox reports, related indicators, and contextual intelligence for SOC triage, incident response, and threat intelligence enrichment workflows.
vt-py (official VirusTotal Python client) or requestsThe API provides RESTful endpoints for file reports (/files/{hash}), URL scanning, domain reports, IP address intelligence, and advanced hunting with VirusTotal Intelligence (VTI). Each file report includes detection results from 70+ AV engines, behavioral analysis from sandboxes, YARA rule matches, sigma rule matches, file metadata (PE headers, imports, sections), network indicators (contacted IPs, domains, URLs), and community votes and comments.
The typical enrichment flow is: receive hash from alert/EDR -> query VT API -> parse detection ratio -> extract behavioral indicators -> correlate with existing intelligence -> make triage decision. The API returns a last_analysis_stats object with malicious, suspicious, undetected, and harmless counts.
VirusTotal enables pivoting from a single hash to related intelligence: similar files (ITW/in-the-wild samples), contacted domains and IPs (C2 infrastructure), dropped files, embedded URLs, YARA rule matches, and threat actor attribution through crowdsourced intelligence.
pythonimport vt import json import hashlib from datetime import datetime class VTEnricher: def __init__(self, api_key): self.client = vt.Client(api_key) def enrich_hash(self, file_hash): """Enrich a file hash with VirusTotal intelligence.""" try: file_obj = self.client.get_object(f"/files/{file_hash}") stats = file_obj.last_analysis_stats report = { "hash": file_hash, "sha256": file_obj.sha256, "sha1": file_obj.sha1, "md5": file_obj.md5, "file_type": getattr(file_obj, "type_description", "Unknown"), "file_size": getattr(file_obj, "size", 0), "first_submission": str(getattr(file_obj, "first_submission_date", "")), "last_analysis_date": str(getattr(file_obj, "last_analysis_date", "")), "detection_stats": { "malicious": stats.get("malicious", 0), "suspicious": stats.get("suspicious", 0), "undetected": stats.get("undetected", 0), "harmless": stats.get("harmless", 0), }, "detection_ratio": f"{stats.get('malicious', 0)}/{sum(stats.values())}", "popular_threat_names": getattr(file_obj, "popular_threat_classification", {}), "tags": getattr(file_obj, "tags", []), "names": getattr(file_obj, "names", []), } total_engines = sum(stats.values()) mal_count = stats.get("malicious", 0) report["threat_level"] = ( "critical" if mal_count > total_engines * 0.7 else "high" if mal_count > total_engines * 0.4 else "medium" if mal_count > total_engines * 0.1 else "low" if mal_count > 0 else "clean" ) print(f"[+] {file_hash[:16]}... -> {report['detection_ratio']} " f"({report['threat_level'].upper()})") return report except vt.error.APIError as e: print(f"[-] VT API error for {file_hash}: {e}") return None def get_behavior_report(self, file_hash): """Get sandbox behavioral analysis for a file.""" try: behaviors = self.client.get_object(f"/files/{file_hash}/behaviours") behavior_data = { "processes_created": [], "files_written": [], "registry_keys_set": [], "dns_lookups": [], "http_conversations": [], "mutexes_created": [], "commands_executed": [], } for sandbox in getattr(behaviors, "data", []): attrs = sandbox.get("attributes", {}) behavior_data["processes_created"].extend( attrs.get("processes_created", [])) behavior_data["files_written"].extend( [f.get("path", "") for f in attrs.get("files_written", [])]) behavior_data["registry_keys_set"].extend( [r.get("key", "") for r in attrs.get("registry_keys_set", [])]) behavior_data["dns_lookups"].extend( [d.get("hostname", "") for d in attrs.get("dns_lookups", [])]) behavior_data["commands_executed"].extend( attrs.get("command_executions", [])) return behavior_data except Exception as e: print(f"[-] Behavior report error: {e}") return {} def close(self): self.client.close() # Usage enricher = VTEnricher("YOUR_VT_API_KEY") report = enricher.enrich_hash("275a021bbfb6489e54d471899f7db9d1663fc695ec2fe2a2c4538aabf651fd0f") print(json.dumps(report, indent=2, default=str)) enricher.close()
pythonimport time import csv def batch_enrich(api_key, hash_file, output_file, rate_limit=4): """Enrich a list of hashes from a file with rate limiting.""" enricher = VTEnricher(api_key) results = [] with open(hash_file, "r") as f: hashes = [line.strip() for line in f if line.strip()] print(f"[*] Enriching {len(hashes)} hashes (rate: {rate_limit}/min)") for i, file_hash in enumerate(hashes): report = enricher.enrich_hash(file_hash) if report: results.append(report) if (i + 1) % rate_limit == 0: print(f" [{i+1}/{len(hashes)}] Rate limit pause (60s)...") time.sleep(60) # Export to CSV with open(output_file, "w", newline="") as f: if results: writer = csv.DictWriter(f, fieldnames=results[0].keys()) writer.writeheader() for r in results: flat = {k: str(v) for k, v in r.items()} writer.writerow(flat) print(f"[+] Enrichment complete: {len(results)}/{len(hashes)} hashes") print(f"[+] Results saved to {output_file}") enricher.close() return results batch_enrich("YOUR_API_KEY", "hashes.txt", "enrichment_results.csv")
pythondef extract_network_iocs(api_key, file_hash): """Extract network-based IOCs from VT for C2 identification.""" client = vt.Client(api_key) network_iocs = { "contacted_ips": [], "contacted_domains": [], "contacted_urls": [], "embedded_urls": [], } try: # Get contacted IPs it = client.iterator(f"/files/{file_hash}/contacted_ips") for ip_obj in it: network_iocs["contacted_ips"].append({ "ip": ip_obj.id, "country": getattr(ip_obj, "country", ""), "asn": getattr(ip_obj, "asn", 0), "as_owner": getattr(ip_obj, "as_owner", ""), }) # Get contacted domains it = client.iterator(f"/files/{file_hash}/contacted_domains") for domain_obj in it: network_iocs["contacted_domains"].append({ "domain": domain_obj.id, "registrar": getattr(domain_obj, "registrar", ""), "creation_date": str(getattr(domain_obj, "creation_date", "")), }) # Get contacted URLs it = client.iterator(f"/files/{file_hash}/contacted_urls") for url_obj in it: network_iocs["contacted_urls"].append({ "url": url_obj.url, "last_http_response_code": getattr(url_obj, "last_http_response_content_length", 0), }) except Exception as e: print(f"[-] Error extracting network IOCs: {e}") finally: client.close() print(f"[+] Network IOCs: {len(network_iocs['contacted_ips'])} IPs, " f"{len(network_iocs['contacted_domains'])} domains, " f"{len(network_iocs['contacted_urls'])} URLs") return network_iocs
pythondef get_yara_matches(api_key, file_hash): """Retrieve YARA rule matches for threat classification.""" client = vt.Client(api_key) try: file_obj = client.get_object(f"/files/{file_hash}") crowdsourced_yara = getattr(file_obj, "crowdsourced_yara_results", []) matches = [] for rule in crowdsourced_yara: matches.append({ "rule_name": rule.get("rule_name", ""), "ruleset_name": rule.get("ruleset_name", ""), "author": rule.get("author", ""), "description": rule.get("description", ""), "source": rule.get("source", ""), }) # Classify based on YARA matches classifications = set() for m in matches: rule_lower = m["rule_name"].lower() if any(k in rule_lower for k in ["apt", "nation", "state"]): classifications.add("apt") if any(k in rule_lower for k in ["ransom", "crypto"]): classifications.add("ransomware") if any(k in rule_lower for k in ["trojan", "rat", "backdoor"]): classifications.add("trojan") if any(k in rule_lower for k in ["loader", "dropper"]): classifications.add("loader") print(f"[+] YARA: {len(matches)} rules matched") print(f"[+] Classifications: {classifications or {'unclassified'}}") return {"matches": matches, "classifications": list(classifications)} finally: client.close()
pythondef generate_enrichment_report(hash_report, behavior, network, yara_data): """Generate comprehensive enrichment report.""" report = { "metadata": { "generated": datetime.now().isoformat(), "hash": hash_report.get("sha256", ""), }, "verdict": { "threat_level": hash_report.get("threat_level", "unknown"), "detection_ratio": hash_report.get("detection_ratio", "0/0"), "classifications": yara_data.get("classifications", []), "threat_names": hash_report.get("popular_threat_names", {}), }, "behavioral_indicators": { "processes": behavior.get("processes_created", [])[:10], "dns_queries": behavior.get("dns_lookups", [])[:10], "commands": behavior.get("commands_executed", [])[:10], }, "network_indicators": { "c2_candidates": network.get("contacted_ips", [])[:10], "domains": network.get("contacted_domains", [])[:10], }, "yara_matches": yara_data.get("matches", [])[:10], "recommendation": ( "BLOCK and investigate" if hash_report.get("threat_level") in ("critical", "high") else "Monitor and analyze" if hash_report.get("threat_level") == "medium" else "Low risk - continue monitoring" ), } with open(f"enrichment_{hash_report.get('sha256', 'unknown')[:16]}.json", "w") as f: json.dump(report, f, indent=2, default=str) return report
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.