Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Performs OAuth 2.0 scope minimization review to identify over-permissioned third-party application integrations, excessive API scopes, unused token grants, and risky OAuth consent patterns across identity providers and SaaS platforms. Activates for requests involving OAuth scope audit, API permission review, third-party app risk assessment, or consent grant minimization.
.claude/skills/performing-oauth-scope-minimization-review/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 100% | 10 |
| gemini-3.1-pro-preview | 100% | 3 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Do not use for reviewing first-party application permissions within the same trust boundary; OAuth scope minimization focuses on third-party and cross-boundary consent grants.
Enumerate all OAuth application registrations and delegated permissions:
python""" OAuth Grant Inventory - Microsoft Entra ID Enumerates all application registrations, service principals, and delegated/application permission grants. """ import requests import json from collections import defaultdict class EntraOAuthAuditor: def __init__(self, tenant_id, client_id, client_secret): self.tenant_id = tenant_id self.base_url = "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0" self.token = self._get_token(client_id, client_secret) self.headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {self.token}"} def _get_token(self, client_id, client_secret): url = f"https://login.microsoftonline.com/{self.tenant_id}/oauth2/v2.0/token" response = requests.post(url, data={ "grant_type": "client_credentials", "client_id": client_id, "client_secret": client_secret, "scope": "https://graph.microsoft.com/.default" }) return response.json()["access_token"] def get_all_service_principals(self): """Get all service principals (enterprise applications).""" apps = [] url = f"{self.base_url}/servicePrincipals?$top=999&$select=id,appId,displayName,appOwnerOrganizationId,servicePrincipalType,accountEnabled,createdDateTime" while url: response = requests.get(url, headers=self.headers) data = response.json() apps.extend(data.get("value", [])) url = data.get("@odata.nextLink") return apps def get_oauth2_permission_grants(self): """Get all delegated permission grants (user consent).""" grants = [] url = f"{self.base_url}/oauth2PermissionGrants?$top=999" while url: response = requests.get(url, headers=self.headers) data = response.json() grants.extend(data.get("value", [])) url = data.get("@odata.nextLink") return grants def get_app_role_assignments(self, sp_id): """Get application permission assignments for a service principal.""" url = f"{self.base_url}/servicePrincipals/{sp_id}/appRoleAssignments" response = requests.get(url, headers=self.headers) return response.json().get("value", []) def build_permission_inventory(self): """Build comprehensive OAuth permission inventory.""" service_principals = self.get_all_service_principals() delegated_grants = self.get_oauth2_permission_grants() # Map service principal IDs to names sp_map = {sp["id"]: sp for sp in service_principals} inventory = [] # Process delegated permissions for grant in delegated_grants: sp = sp_map.get(grant["clientId"], {}) scopes = grant.get("scope", "").split() for scope in scopes: if not scope: continue inventory.append({ "app_name": sp.get("displayName", "Unknown"), "app_id": grant.get("clientId"), "publisher_tenant": sp.get("appOwnerOrganizationId"), "is_third_party": sp.get("appOwnerOrganizationId") != self.tenant_id, "permission_type": "Delegated", "scope": scope, "consent_type": grant.get("consentType"), # AllPrincipals or Principal "principal_id": grant.get("principalId"), "granted_date": sp.get("createdDateTime"), "is_enabled": sp.get("accountEnabled", True) }) # Process application permissions for sp in service_principals: app_roles = self.get_app_role_assignments(sp["id"]) for role in app_roles: inventory.append({ "app_name": sp.get("displayName"), "app_id": sp.get("id"), "publisher_tenant": sp.get("appOwnerOrganizationId"), "is_third_party": sp.get("appOwnerOrganizationId") != self.tenant_id, "permission_type": "Application", "scope": role.get("appRoleId"), "consent_type": "AdminConsent", "granted_date": role.get("createdDateTime"), "is_enabled": sp.get("accountEnabled", True) }) return inventory
Categorize permissions based on data access sensitivity:
python""" OAuth Scope Risk Classification Maps API scopes to risk levels based on data sensitivity and access breadth. """ MICROSOFT_GRAPH_SCOPE_RISK = { # CRITICAL - Full administrative or unrestricted access "critical": { "scopes": [ "Directory.ReadWrite.All", "RoleManagement.ReadWrite.Directory", "Application.ReadWrite.All", "AppRoleAssignment.ReadWrite.All", "Mail.ReadWrite", "Mail.Send", "Files.ReadWrite.All", "Sites.FullControl.All", "User.ReadWrite.All", "Group.ReadWrite.All", "MailboxSettings.ReadWrite", "full_access_as_app", ], "risk_description": "Can read/write all data, modify directory, or impersonate users", "review_frequency": "Monthly", "requires_admin_consent": True }, # HIGH - Broad read access or sensitive data write "high": { "scopes": [ "Mail.Read", "Mail.Read.Shared", "Calendars.ReadWrite", "Contacts.ReadWrite", "Files.Read.All", "Sites.Read.All", "User.Read.All", "Group.Read.All", "Directory.Read.All", "AuditLog.Read.All", "SecurityEvents.ReadWrite.All", "TeamSettings.ReadWrite.All", ], "risk_description": "Broad read access to sensitive organizational data", "review_frequency": "Quarterly", "requires_admin_consent": True }, # MEDIUM - Scoped data access "medium": { "scopes": [ "Calendars.Read", "Contacts.Read", "Files.ReadWrite", "Sites.ReadWrite.All", "Tasks.ReadWrite", "Notes.ReadWrite.All", "Chat.ReadWrite", "ChannelMessage.Send", "Team.ReadBasic.All", ], "risk_description": "Scoped access to specific data types with write capability", "review_frequency": "Semi-annually" }, # LOW - Minimal or user-profile only access "low": { "scopes": [ "User.Read", "openid", "profile", "email", "offline_access", "Calendars.Read.Shared", "People.Read", "User.ReadBasic.All", ], "risk_description": "Basic user profile or minimal scoped access", "review_frequency": "Annually" } } def classify_scope_risk(scope): """Classify a single OAuth scope by risk level.""" for risk_level, config in MICROSOFT_GRAPH_SCOPE_RISK.items(): if scope in config["scopes"]: return { "scope": scope, "risk_level": risk_level, "description": config["risk_description"], "review_frequency": config["review_frequency"] } # Unknown scopes default to HIGH risk return { "scope": scope, "risk_level": "high", "description": "Unknown scope - requires manual classification", "review_frequency": "Quarterly" } def analyze_app_risk(app_permissions): """Calculate aggregate risk score for an application's permissions.""" risk_weights = {"critical": 40, "high": 20, "medium": 10, "low": 2} total_score = 0 classified_scopes = [] for perm in app_permissions: classification = classify_scope_risk(perm["scope"]) classified_scopes.append(classification) total_score += risk_weights.get(classification["risk_level"], 10) # Bonus risk for application (vs delegated) permissions app_type_permissions = [p for p in app_permissions if p["permission_type"] == "Application"] total_score += len(app_type_permissions) * 15 # Bonus risk for admin-consented broad access admin_consent = [p for p in app_permissions if p["consent_type"] == "AllPrincipals"] total_score += len(admin_consent) * 10 if total_score >= 100: aggregate_risk = "CRITICAL" elif total_score >= 60: aggregate_risk = "HIGH" elif total_score >= 30: aggregate_risk = "MEDIUM" else: aggregate_risk = "LOW" return { "total_score": total_score, "aggregate_risk": aggregate_risk, "scope_count": len(app_permissions), "critical_scopes": len([s for s in classified_scopes if s["risk_level"] == "critical"]), "high_scopes": len([s for s in classified_scopes if s["risk_level"] == "high"]), "classified_scopes": classified_scopes }
Detect apps requesting more permissions than functionally needed:
python""" Over-Permission Detection Identifies applications with excessive OAuth scopes relative to their function. """ def detect_over_permissions(inventory, approved_apps_catalog): """ Compare actual permissions against approved scope catalog to find over-permissioned applications. """ findings = [] # Group permissions by application app_permissions = defaultdict(list) for perm in inventory: app_permissions[perm["app_name"]].append(perm) for app_name, permissions in app_permissions.items(): # Check against approved catalog approved = approved_apps_catalog.get(app_name) if not approved: # Unknown/unapproved application findings.append({ "app_name": app_name, "finding_type": "UNAPPROVED_APPLICATION", "severity": "HIGH", "detail": f"Application not in approved catalog with {len(permissions)} permission grants", "scopes": [p["scope"] for p in permissions], "recommendation": "Review and approve or revoke all permissions" }) continue approved_scopes = set(approved.get("approved_scopes", [])) actual_scopes = set(p["scope"] for p in permissions) # Find excessive scopes (granted but not approved) excessive = actual_scopes - approved_scopes if excessive: risk = analyze_app_risk([p for p in permissions if p["scope"] in excessive]) findings.append({ "app_name": app_name, "finding_type": "EXCESSIVE_SCOPES", "severity": risk["aggregate_risk"], "detail": f"{len(excessive)} scopes beyond approved list", "excessive_scopes": list(excessive), "approved_scopes": list(approved_scopes), "recommendation": "Remove excessive scopes or update approved catalog" }) # Find unused scopes (approved but activity logs show no API calls) # This requires API activity log correlation unused = approved_scopes - actual_scopes if unused: findings.append({ "app_name": app_name, "finding_type": "UNUSED_APPROVED_SCOPES", "severity": "LOW", "detail": f"{len(unused)} approved scopes not currently granted", "unused_scopes": list(unused) }) # Check for overly broad permissions broad_patterns = [ ("Mail.ReadWrite", "Mail.Read", "Write access to mail when only read needed"), ("Files.ReadWrite.All", "Files.Read.All", "Write access to all files when only read needed"), ("Directory.ReadWrite.All", "Directory.Read.All", "Write access to directory when only read needed"), ("User.ReadWrite.All", "User.Read.All", "Write access to users when only read needed"), ] for broad, narrow, description in broad_patterns: if broad in actual_scopes: findings.append({ "app_name": app_name, "finding_type": "OVERLY_BROAD_SCOPE", "severity": "MEDIUM", "detail": description, "current_scope": broad, "recommended_scope": narrow, "recommendation": f"Downgrade from {broad} to {narrow}" }) return findings
Identify OAuth tokens that are no longer actively used:
python""" Token Usage Audit Analyzes sign-in logs and API activity to identify stale OAuth grants. """ def audit_token_usage(auditor, days_inactive=90): """Identify OAuth grants with no recent API activity.""" # Get sign-in activity for service principals url = f"{auditor.base_url}/auditLogs/signIns" params = { "$filter": f"createdDateTime ge {(datetime.utcnow() - timedelta(days=days_inactive)).isoformat()}Z and signInEventTypes/any(t: t eq 'servicePrincipal')", "$top": 999 } active_apps = set() while url: response = requests.get(url, headers=auditor.headers, params=params) data = response.json() for signin in data.get("value", []): active_apps.add(signin.get("appId")) url = data.get("@odata.nextLink") params = {} # Compare against all granted apps all_grants = auditor.get_oauth2_permission_grants() sp_map = {sp["id"]: sp for sp in auditor.get_all_service_principals()} stale_grants = [] for grant in all_grants: sp = sp_map.get(grant["clientId"], {}) app_id = sp.get("appId") if app_id and app_id not in active_apps: stale_grants.append({ "app_name": sp.get("displayName", "Unknown"), "app_id": app_id, "scopes": grant.get("scope", "").split(), "consent_type": grant.get("consentType"), "is_third_party": sp.get("appOwnerOrganizationId") != auditor.tenant_id, "days_inactive": days_inactive, "recommendation": "Revoke - no API activity in {days_inactive} days" }) return sorted(stale_grants, key=lambda x: len(x["scopes"]), reverse=True)
Create and execute the scope minimization remediation plan:
python""" OAuth Scope Remediation Generates and executes scope reduction actions. """ def generate_remediation_plan(findings, stale_grants): """Create prioritized remediation plan.""" plan = [] # Priority 1: Revoke unapproved applications for f in findings: if f["finding_type"] == "UNAPPROVED_APPLICATION": plan.append({ "priority": 1, "action": "REVOKE_ALL_PERMISSIONS", "app_name": f["app_name"], "reason": "Unapproved third-party application", "impact": f"Removes {len(f['scopes'])} permission grants", "risk_if_not_addressed": "CRITICAL" }) # Priority 2: Remove excessive scopes from approved apps for f in findings: if f["finding_type"] == "EXCESSIVE_SCOPES": plan.append({ "priority": 2, "action": "REMOVE_EXCESSIVE_SCOPES", "app_name": f["app_name"], "scopes_to_remove": f["excessive_scopes"], "reason": "Scopes beyond approved catalog", "risk_if_not_addressed": f["severity"] }) # Priority 3: Downgrade overly broad scopes for f in findings: if f["finding_type"] == "OVERLY_BROAD_SCOPE": plan.append({ "priority": 3, "action": "DOWNGRADE_SCOPE", "app_name": f["app_name"], "current_scope": f["current_scope"], "target_scope": f["recommended_scope"], "reason": f["detail"], "risk_if_not_addressed": "MEDIUM" }) # Priority 4: Revoke stale grants for grant in stale_grants: plan.append({ "priority": 4, "action": "REVOKE_STALE_GRANT", "app_name": grant["app_name"], "scopes_to_revoke": grant["scopes"], "reason": f"No API activity in {grant['days_inactive']} days", "risk_if_not_addressed": "MEDIUM" }) return sorted(plan, key=lambda x: x["priority"]) def execute_scope_reduction(auditor, grant_id, scopes_to_remove): """Remove specific scopes from an OAuth permission grant.""" # Get current grant url = f"{auditor.base_url}/oauth2PermissionGrants/{grant_id}" response = requests.get(url, headers=auditor.headers) current_grant = response.json() current_scopes = set(current_grant.get("scope", "").split()) updated_scopes = current_scopes - set(scopes_to_remove) if not updated_scopes: # Remove entire grant requests.delete(url, headers=auditor.headers) return {"action": "grant_deleted", "grant_id": grant_id} else: # Update with reduced scopes update_body = {"scope": " ".join(updated_scopes)} requests.patch(url, headers=auditor.headers, json=update_body) return { "action": "scopes_reduced", "grant_id": grant_id, "removed": list(scopes_to_remove), "remaining": list(updated_scopes) }
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | OAuth Scope | Permission string defining the specific API access level granted to a client application (e.g., Mail.Read, Files.ReadWrite.All) | | Delegated Permission | OAuth scope exercised on behalf of a signed-in user, limited by both the app's permissions and the user's own access rights | | Application Permission | OAuth scope granted directly to the application without user context, providing access to all users' data (high risk) | | Admin Consent | Tenant-wide permission grant made by an administrator that applies to all users without individual consent | | Scope Minimization | Security principle of reducing OAuth permissions to the minimum set required for application functionality | | Stale Grant | OAuth permission that remains active but has no recent API usage, indicating the integration is abandoned or deprecated |
Context: After a phishing attack compromised an admin account, investigation reveals the attacker registered a malicious OAuth application with Mail.ReadWrite and Files.ReadWrite.All scopes, exfiltrating 6 months of email. The organization needs a comprehensive OAuth scope review.
Approach:
Pitfalls:
OAUTH SCOPE MINIMIZATION REVIEW REPORT
=========================================
Tenant: corp.onmicrosoft.com
Review Period: 2026-02-01 to 2026-02-24
Total Applications: 147
Third-Party Apps: 98
First-Party Apps: 49
PERMISSION INVENTORY
Total OAuth Grants: 487
Delegated Permissions: 312
Application Permissions: 175
Admin-Consented: 89
User-Consented: 223
RISK CLASSIFICATION
Critical Risk Apps: 7
- UnknownCRMApp (Mail.ReadWrite, Files.ReadWrite.All - UNAPPROVED)
- LegacySync (Directory.ReadWrite.All - EXCESSIVE)
- DevToolX (Application.ReadWrite.All - OVERLY BROAD)
High Risk Apps: 18
Medium Risk Apps: 34
Low Risk Apps: 88
FINDINGS
Unapproved Applications: 12 (REVOKE IMMEDIATELY)
Excessive Scopes: 23 apps with scopes beyond approved list
Overly Broad Permissions: 15 apps that can be downgraded
Stale Grants (90+ days): 31 apps with no recent API activity
REMEDIATION PLAN
Priority 1 (Immediate): 12 unapproved app revocations
Priority 2 (This Week): 23 excessive scope removals
Priority 3 (This Month): 15 scope downgrades
Priority 4 (Next Quarter): 31 stale grant revocations
Estimated Scope Reduction: 34% of total permissions| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.