Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Build comprehensive forensic super-timelines using Plaso (log2timeline) to correlate events across file systems, logs, and artifacts into a unified chronological view.
.claude/skills/performing-timeline-reconstruction-with-plaso/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
bash# Install Plaso on Ubuntu/Debian sudo add-apt-repository ppa:gift/stable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install plaso-tools # Or install via pip pip install plaso # Or use Docker (recommended for dependency isolation) docker pull log2timeline/plaso # Verify installation log2timeline.py --version psort.py --version # Create output directory mkdir -p /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/ # Verify the forensic image img_stat /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd
bash# Basic processing of a disk image (all parsers) log2timeline.py \ --storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd # Process with specific parsers for faster targeted analysis log2timeline.py \ --parsers "winevtx,prefetch,mft,usnjrnl,lnk,recycle_bin,chrome_history,firefox_history,winreg" \ --storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd # Process with a filter file to focus on specific paths cat << 'EOF' > /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/filter.txt /Windows/System32/winevt/Logs /Windows/Prefetch /Users/*/NTUSER.DAT /Users/*/AppData/Local/Google/Chrome /Users/*/AppData/Roaming/Mozilla/Firefox /$MFT /$UsnJrnl:$J /Windows/System32/config EOF log2timeline.py \ --filter-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/filter.txt \ --storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd # Using Docker docker run --rm -v /cases:/cases log2timeline/plaso log2timeline \ --storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ /cases/case-2024-001/images/evidence.dd # Process multiple evidence sources into one timeline log2timeline.py \ --storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/combined.plaso \ /cases/case-2024-001/images/workstation.dd log2timeline.py \ --storage-file /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/combined.plaso \ /cases/case-2024-001/images/server.dd
bash# Export full timeline to CSV (super-timeline format) psort.py \ -o l2tcsv \ -w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/full_timeline.csv \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso # Export with date range filter (focus on incident window) psort.py \ -o l2tcsv \ -w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/incident_window.csv \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ "date > '2024-01-15 00:00:00' AND date < '2024-01-20 23:59:59'" # Export in JSON Lines format (for ingestion into SIEM/Timesketch) psort.py \ -o json_line \ -w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/timeline.jsonl \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso # Export with specific source type filters psort.py \ -o l2tcsv \ -w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/registry_events.csv \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ "source_short == 'REG'" psort.py \ -o l2tcsv \ -w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evtx_events.csv \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso \ "source_short == 'EVT'" # Export for Timeline Explorer (dynamic CSV) psort.py \ -o dynamic \ -w /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/timeline_explorer.csv \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso
bash# Install Timesketch (Docker deployment) git clone https://github.com/google/timesketch.git cd timesketch docker compose up -d # Import Plaso file into Timesketch via CLI timesketch_importer \ --host http://localhost:5000 \ --username analyst \ --password password \ --sketch_id 1 \ --timeline_name "Case 2024-001 Workstation" \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/evidence.plaso # Alternatively, import JSONL timesketch_importer \ --host http://localhost:5000 \ --username analyst \ --sketch_id 1 \ --timeline_name "Case 2024-001" \ /cases/case-2024-001/timeline/timeline.jsonl # In Timesketch web UI: # 1. Search for events: "data_type:windows:evtx:record AND event_identifier:4624" # 2. Apply Sigma analyzers for automated detection # 3. Star/tag important events # 4. Create stories documenting the investigation narrative # 5. Share with team members
bash# Analyze specific time periods around known events python3 << 'PYEOF' import csv from collections import defaultdict from datetime import datetime # Load incident window timeline events_by_hour = defaultdict(list) source_counts = defaultdict(int) with open('/cases/case-2024-001/timeline/incident_window.csv', 'r', errors='ignore') as f: reader = csv.DictReader(f) total = 0 for row in reader: total += 1 timestamp = row.get('datetime', row.get('date', '')) source = row.get('source_short', row.get('source', 'Unknown')) description = row.get('message', row.get('desc', '')) source_counts[source] += 1 # Group by hour for activity patterns try: dt = datetime.strptime(timestamp[:19], '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S') hour_key = dt.strftime('%Y-%m-%d %H:00') events_by_hour[hour_key].append({ 'time': timestamp, 'source': source, 'description': description[:200] }) except (ValueError, TypeError): pass print(f"Total events in incident window: {total}\n") print("=== EVENTS BY SOURCE TYPE ===") for source, count in sorted(source_counts.items(), key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True): print(f" {source}: {count}") print("\n=== ACTIVITY BY HOUR ===") for hour in sorted(events_by_hour.keys()): count = len(events_by_hour[hour]) bar = '#' * min(count // 10, 50) print(f" {hour}: {count:>6} events {bar}") # Find hours with unusual activity spikes avg = total / max(len(events_by_hour), 1) print(f"\n=== ANOMALOUS HOURS (>{avg*3:.0f} events) ===") for hour in sorted(events_by_hour.keys()): if len(events_by_hour[hour]) > avg * 3: print(f" {hour}: {len(events_by_hour[hour])} events (SPIKE)") PYEOF
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | Super-timeline | Unified chronological view combining all artifact timestamps from multiple sources | | MACB timestamps | Modified, Accessed, Changed (metadata), Born (created) - four key file timestamp types | | Plaso storage file | SQLite-based intermediate format storing parsed events before export | | L2T CSV | Log2timeline CSV format with standardized columns for timeline events | | Parser | Plaso module extracting timestamps from a specific artifact type (e.g., winevtx, prefetch) | | Psort | Plaso sorting and filtering tool for post-processing storage files | | Timesketch | Google open-source collaborative timeline analysis platform | | Pivot points | Known timestamps (e.g., malware execution) used to focus investigation scope |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | log2timeline (Plaso) | Primary timeline generation engine parsing 100+ artifact types | | psort | Plaso output filtering, sorting, and export utility | | Timesketch | Web-based collaborative forensic timeline analysis platform | | Timeline Explorer | Eric Zimmerman's Windows GUI for CSV timeline analysis | | KAPE | Automated triage collection feeding into Plaso processing | | mactime (TSK) | Simpler timeline generation from Sleuth Kit bodyfiles | | Excel/Sheets | Manual timeline review for small filtered datasets | | Elastic/Kibana | Alternative visualization platform for JSONL timeline data |
Scenario 1: Ransomware Attack Reconstruction Process the full disk image with Plaso, filter to the week before encryption was discovered, identify the initial access vector from browser history and event logs, trace privilege escalation through registry and Prefetch, map lateral movement from network logon events, pinpoint encryption start from MFT timestamps showing mass file modifications.
Scenario 2: Data Theft Investigation Create super-timeline from suspect's workstation, filter for USB device connection events, file access timestamps, and cloud storage browser activity, build a narrative showing data staging, compression, and exfiltration, present timeline to legal team with tagged evidence points.
Scenario 3: Multi-System Breach Analysis Process disk images from all affected systems into a single Plaso storage file, import into Timesketch for collaborative analysis, search for lateral movement patterns across system timelines, identify the patient-zero system and initial compromise vector, map the full attack chain across the environment.
Scenario 4: Insider Threat After-Hours Activity Filter timeline to non-business hours only, identify file access patterns outside normal working times, correlate with authentication events (badge access, VPN logon), search for data access to sensitive directories during these periods, build evidence package for HR/legal.
Timeline Reconstruction Summary:
Evidence Sources:
Disk Image: evidence.dd (500 GB, NTFS)
Plaso Storage: evidence.plaso (2.3 GB)
Processing Statistics:
Total events extracted: 4,567,890
Parsers used: 45 (winevtx, prefetch, mft, usnjrnl, lnk, chrome, firefox, winreg, ...)
Processing time: 3h 45m
Incident Window (2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20):
Events in window: 234,567
Event Sources:
MFT: 89,234
Event Logs: 45,678
USN Journal: 56,789
Registry: 23,456
Prefetch: 1,234
Browser: 5,678
LNK Files: 2,345
Other: 10,153
Key Timeline Events:
2024-01-15 14:32 - Phishing email opened (browser)
2024-01-15 14:33 - Malicious document downloaded
2024-01-15 14:35 - PowerShell executed (Prefetch + Event Log)
2024-01-15 14:36 - C2 connection established (Registry + Event Log)
2024-01-16 02:30 - Mimikatz execution (Prefetch)
2024-01-16 02:45 - Lateral movement to DC (Event Log)
2024-01-17 03:00 - Data exfiltration (MFT + USN Journal)
2024-01-18 03:00 - Log clearing (Event Log)
Exported Files:
Full Timeline: /timeline/full_timeline.csv (4.5M rows)
Incident Window: /timeline/incident_window.csv (234K rows)
Timesketch Import: /timeline/timeline.jsonl| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +30 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.