Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Generate complete Power Platform custom connector with MCP integration for Copilot Studio - includes schema generation, troubleshooting, and validation
.claude/skills/power-platform-mcp-connector-suite/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Generate comprehensive Power Platform custom connector implementations with Model Context Protocol integration for Microsoft Copilot Studio.
Currently Supported:
Not Yet Supported:
Create complete Power Platform connector with:
Core Files:
apiDefinition.swagger.json with x-ms-agentic-protocol: mcp-streamable-1.0apiProperties.json with connector metadata and authenticationscript.csx with custom C# transformations for MCP JSON-RPC handlingreadme.md with connector documentationMCP Integration:
/mcp endpoint for JSON-RPC 2.0 communicationValidate schemas for Copilot Studio compliance:
$ref) in tool inputs/outputs["string", "number"])Common issues and fixes:
x-ms-agentic-protocol headerGenerate all files for a new Power Platform MCP connector from scratch, including CLI validation setup.
Analyze and fix existing schemas for Copilot Studio compliance using paconn and validation tools.
Diagnose and resolve MCP integration issues with Copilot Studio using CLI debugging tools.
Add MCP capabilities to existing Power Platform connector with proper validation workflows.
Prepare connector for Microsoft certification submission with complete metadata and validation compliance.
Implement OAuth 2.0 authentication enhanced with MCP security best practices and advanced token validation.
1. apiDefinition.swagger.json
POST /mcp with proper protocol header2. apiProperties.json
iconBrandColor required)3. script.csx
4. Implementation guidance
x-ms-agentic-protocol: mcp-streamable-1.0 in MCP endpointpaconn validate --api-def apiDefinition.swagger.json passes without errorspac connector create/updateConnectorPackageValidator.ps1 runs successfullyyamlMode: Complete New Connector Connector Name: Customer Analytics MCP Server Purpose: Customer data analysis and insights Tools Needed: - searchCustomers: Find customers by criteria - getCustomerProfile: Retrieve detailed customer data - analyzeCustomerTrends: Generate trend analysis Resources: - Customer profiles (JSON data) - Analysis reports (structured data) Authentication: oauth2 Host Environment: Azure Function Target APIs: CRM REST API
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.