Creates an Architecture Decision Record following the Nygard format to document significant technical decisions, their context, and consequences.
SkillScore95Maintained
Automatic
◆Doc Ops pack
Last verified 8/18/2026
What it changes
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 16 of 22 without it.
Without skill73%
With skill95%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Recommends using a solution brief or proposal document rather than an architectural decision record
Recommends recording the exploration as a spike summary rather than an architecture decision record
Recommends using a design rationale or product decision document instead of an architectural decision record
and 2 more in the full report
5 fixed16 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+23 pp
Tokens
+27%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-16%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/18/2026v221 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 5
Prompt
Our team is starting a 3-day investigation to test whether a vector database can process 10,000 queries per second. We have not made any system choice yet. Create an ADR for this research.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Recommends recording the exploration as a spike summary rather than an architecture decision record
Missed
Passed
case-02 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/18/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md61 lines3 files
Architecture Decision Record (ADR)
An Architecture Decision Record documents a significant technical decision along with its context and consequences. ADRs capture the "why" behind architectural choices so future team members understand the reasoning - especially important when they question why something was done a particular way. This skill follows Michael Nygard's lightweight ADR format.
When to Use
Making significant technical decisions that affect system architecture
Choosing between technology options (frameworks, databases, services)
Establishing patterns that future development should follow
Documenting the rationale for constraints or non-obvious approaches
Preserving institutional knowledge about past decisions
When NOT to Use
The decision is a product or UX design choice, not architecture or technology -> use develop-design-rationale
You are still exploring whether an approach is feasible -> time-box the exploration and record it with develop-spike-summary first
You need to pitch a solution to stakeholders -> use develop-solution-brief; an ADR records a decision, it does not sell one
Nothing is actually being decided (the status quo continues unchanged): an ADR without a decision is noise; wait until there is one
Instructions
When asked to create an ADR, follow these steps:
Assign a Number and Title
ADRs are numbered sequentially (ADR-001, ADR-002, etc.) for easy reference. The title should be a short noun phrase describing the decision, like "Use PostgreSQL for order data" or "Adopt React for frontend."
Set the Status
New ADRs start as "Proposed." After team review, they become "Accepted," "Deprecated," or "Superseded by ADR-XXX." Status changes should be tracked.
Describe the Context
Explain the circumstances that led to this decision. What problem are you solving? What forces are at play (technical constraints, team expertise, timeline, cost)? This section should help a reader who wasn't there understand why this decision was needed.
State the Decision
Clearly articulate what you decided. Use active voice: "We will use..." rather than "It was decided..." Be specific about what is and isn't included in the decision.
Document the Consequences
List the outcomes of this decision - positive, negative, and neutral. Good ADRs are honest about trade-offs. What becomes easier? What becomes harder? What new constraints or options does this create?
Record the Model-Choice Consequences(only when the decision selects a model or commits the system to one)
Creates Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) to document significant architectural choices and their rationale for future team members. Use when the user says "write an ADR", "document this decision", "record why we chose X", "add an architecture decision record", "create an ADR for", or wants to capture the reasoning behind a technical choice so the team understands it later. Do NOT use when the decision hasn't been made yet (use create-rfc instead), for implementation planning (use technical-d