Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Guides embedding model migration in Qdrant without downtime. Use when someone asks 'how to switch embedding models', 'how to migrate vectors', 'how to update to a new model', 'zero-downtime model change', 'how to re-embed my data', or 'can I use two models at once'. Also use when upgrading model dimensions, switching providers, or A/B testing models.
.claude/skills/qdrant-qdrant-model-migration/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 4% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 14% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 6% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -18% | 0% |
Vectors from different models are incompatible. You cannot mix old and new embeddings in the same vector space. On v1.18+, you can add or delete named vector fields on an existing collection — migration no longer always requires a new collection. On v1.17 or earlier, all named vectors must be defined at collection creation time.
Use when: looking for shortcuts before committing to full migration.
You MUST re-embed if: changing model provider (OpenAI to Cohere), changing architecture (CLIP to BGE), incompatible dimension counts across different models, or adding sparse vectors to dense-only collection.
You CAN avoid re-embedding if: using Matryoshka models (use dimensions parameter to output lower-dimensional embeddings, learn linear transformation from sample data, some recall loss, good for 100M+ datasets). Or changing quantization (binary to scalar): Qdrant re-quantizes automatically. Quantization
Use when: production must stay available. Recommended for model replacement at scale.
UpdateVectors Update vectorsCareful, the alias swap only redirects queries. Payloads must be re-uploaded separately.
Use when: A/B testing models, multi-modal (dense + sparse), or evaluating a new model before committing.
UpdateVectors Update vectorsUpdateVectors Update vectorsusing: "old_model" vs using: "new_model"Co-locating large multi-vectors (especially ColBERT) with dense vectors degrades ALL queries, even those only using dense. At millions of points, users report 13s latency dropping to 2s after removing ColBERT. Put large vectors on disk during side-by-side migration.
If you anticipate future model migrations, define both vector fields upfront at collection creation.
Use when: adding sparse/BM25 vectors to an existing dense-only collection. Most common migration pattern.
You cannot add sparse vectors to an existing collection that uses a default (unnamed) dense vector. Must recreate:
If the collection already uses named dense vectors and is on v1.18+, add the sparse vector field directly without recreating Update vector schema.
Sparse vectors at chunk level have different TF-IDF characteristics than document level. Test retrieval quality after migration, especially for non-English text without stop-word removal.
Use when: dataset is large and re-embedding is the bottleneck.
update_mode: insert (v1.17+) for safe idempotent migration Update modewith_vectors=False, re-embed in batches, upsert into new collectionindexing_threshold_kb very high, restore after)For 400GB+ datasets, expect days. For small datasets (<25MB), re-indexing from source is faster than using the migration tool.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 19,872 | 16,124 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,777 | 3,925 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 18,302 | 11,351 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,017 | 3,450 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 18,151 | 13,753 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,060 | 3,657 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 14,730 | 11,786 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,768 | 3,586 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 9,301 | 5,373 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,624 | 2,368 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 18,270 | 8,288 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,136 | 2,842 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 15,063 | 6,432 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,547 | 2,707 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→fail | 17,710 | 11,306 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,423 | 3,766 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 14,826 | 8,574 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,131 | 3,041 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 20,010 | 11,223 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,518 | 2,872 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 12,523 | 7,013 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,100 | 2,770 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,417 | 8,204 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,166 | 3,005 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 13,989 | 9,177 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,018 | 2,958 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 19,362 | 14,742 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,919 | 3,727 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 12,927 | 49,495 | +283% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,317 | 2,253 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 12,629 | 6,184 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,755 | 2,358 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 14,601 | 8,044 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,010 | 2,865 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 19,027 | 9,785 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,189 | 2,893 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 6,984 | 6,099 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,298 | 2,701 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 20,602 | 11,725 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,874 | 3,685 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 7,043 | 5,891 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,405 | 2,670 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 14,028 | 14,963 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,769 | 4,329 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.