Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Diagnoses Qdrant production issues using metrics and observability tools. Use when someone reports 'optimizer stuck', 'indexing too slow', 'memory too high', 'OOM crash', 'queries are slow', 'latency spike', or 'search was fast now it's slow'. Also use when performance degrades without obvious config changes.
.claude/skills/qdrant-qdrant-monitoring-debugging/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -11% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -6% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -39% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -53% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -24% | 0% |
First check optimizer status. Most production issues trace back to active optimizations competing for resources. If optimizer is clean, check memory, then request metrics.
Use when: optimizer running for hours, not finishing, or showing errors.
/collections/{collection_name}/optimizations endpoint (v1.17+) to check status Optimization monitoring?with=queued,completed,idle_segmentsoptimizer_status shows an error in collection info, check logs for disk full or corrupted segmentsUse when: memory exceeds expectations, node crashes with OOM, or memory keeps growing.
/metrics (RSS, allocated bytes, page faults)/telemetry for per-collection breakdown of point counts and vector configurationsnum_vectors * dimensions * 4 bytes * 1.5 for vectors, plus payload and index overhead Capacity planningmemory: pinned on Qdrant 1.19 or newer, always_ram: true on 1.18 or older), too many payload indexes, large max_segment_size during optimizationUse when: queries slower than expected and you need to identify the cause.
rest_responses_avg_duration_seconds and rest_responses_max_duration_seconds per endpointrest_responses_duration_seconds (v1.8+) for percentile analysis in Grafanagrpc_responses_ prefix| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 25,046 | 30,177 | +20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,521 | 3,551 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 16,597 | 10,025 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,789 | 2,478 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 18,499 | 11,890 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,088 | 2,914 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 16,664 | 6,925 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,829 | 1,718 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 16,465 | 7,469 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,685 | 1,917 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 14,723 | 2,838 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,591 | 1,224 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 16,974 | 7,909 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,386 | 1,824 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 12,541 | 5,651 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,999 | 1,512 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 8,757 | 2,938 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,494 | 1,246 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 14,883 | 3,247 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,754 | 1,337 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,921 | 3,855 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,924 | 1,380 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 16,090 | 9,482 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,155 | 1,880 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 13,281 | 4,592 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,910 | 1,428 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 7,438 | 1,771 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,362 | 988 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 11,631 | 1,738 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,886 | 1,034 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 13,088 | 5,702 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,322 | 1,724 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,674 | 6,912 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,790 | 1,853 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 12,969 | 7,430 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,419 | 1,903 | -21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 16,088 | 2,090 | -87% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,441 | 1,097 | -55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 9,357 | 5,361 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,403 | 1,542 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,460 | 8,804 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,306 | 2,464 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 5,062 | 3,544 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 795 | 1,390 | +75% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 10,366 | 6,333 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,728 | 1,796 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +43 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.