Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert system for managing communications during crises in Web3 and crypto environments. Use this skill whenever the user needs to respond to a smart contract exploit, security incident, rug pull accusations, FUD campaigns, negative viral content, governance attack, team controversy, or any reputational crisis affecting a crypto project, protocol, or DAO. Also trigger for phrases like "we got hacked", "exploit on our protocol", "FUD spreading", "community is panicking", "negative news", "crisis
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 159% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 204% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 203% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 151% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 176% | 0% |
For: Protocol marketing leads, DAO communication teams, Web3 founders, community managers Philosophy: In crypto, your response speed and honesty matter more than the incident itself. Silence kills trust. Transparency rebuilds it.
Before executing any module, ask:
Then classify and route:
| Crisis Type | Severity | Module | |---|---|---| | Smart contract exploit / hack | 🔴 Critical | MODULE 1: Security Incident Response] | | FUD / misinformation campaign | 🟡 High | MODULE 2: FUD & Misinformation] | | Token price crash / community panic | 🟡 High | MODULE 3: Market Crisis Response] | | Governance attack / hostile proposal | 🟡 High | MODULE 4: Governance Crisis] | | Team controversy / personal scandal | 🟠 High | MODULE 5: Reputational Crisis] | | Negative press / media attack | 🟠 Medium | MODULE 6: Media Crisis] | | Community revolt / mod controversy | 🟡 Medium | MODULE 7: Community Conflict] | | Post-crisis recovery plan | Any | MODULE 8: Recovery & Trust Rebuild] |
Trigger: Smart contract was exploited, funds were drained, vulnerability was found, or protocol was attacked.
Minute 0–15: Internal lockdown
Minute 15–30: First public statement Do NOT wait until you have all the answers. Post a "we are aware" statement first.
FIRST STATEMENT TEMPLATE:
──────────────────────────
We are aware of an issue affecting [PROTOCOL].
We are actively investigating. No further actions are needed from users at this time.
We will provide a full update within [X hours].
[Link to official status page or Discord channel for updates]What NOT to do in the first 30 minutes:
Minute 30–60: Action statement
ACTION STATEMENT TEMPLATE:
───────────────────────────
UPDATE on [Protocol] security incident — [Time] UTC
What we know:
• [Confirmed fact 1 — on-chain if possible]
• [Confirmed fact 2]
• [Estimated impact — funds at risk or already lost]
What we're doing:
• [Action 1: e.g., "Paused deposits and withdrawals"]
• [Action 2: e.g., "Engaged [security firm] to investigate"]
• [Action 3: e.g., "Deployed a contract patch — pending audit"]
What we don't know yet:
• [Uncertainty 1 — be specific about what's still being investigated]
Next update: [specific time, not "soon"]
If you have funds in [Protocol], [specific instruction — withdraw / do not interact / hold]
Incident report will be published within [X hours/days].POST-MORTEM REPORT — [Protocol Name] Security Incident
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Date: [incident date] | Published: [report date]
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
[3–4 sentences: what happened, scope of impact, current status]
TIMELINE:
[HH:MM UTC] — [Event]
[HH:MM UTC] — [Event]
...
ROOT CAUSE:
[Technical explanation — be specific. Vague explanations signal cover-up.]
IMPACT:
• Funds affected: [$X / X tokens]
• Users affected: [X wallets / accounts]
• Systems affected: [specific contracts/components]
WHAT WE DID:
[Chronological response actions with timestamps]
RECOVERY PLAN:
• [How affected users will be compensated, if at all]
• [Timeline for protocol resumption]
• [Security improvements being implemented]
PREVENTION MEASURES:
• [What we're changing to prevent recurrence]
• [Additional audits or monitoring being added]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
[Thank white-hats, security researchers, or community members who helped]
We take full responsibility for [specific aspects].
[If appropriate: what we could have done differently]
Contact for affected users: [email or Discord channel]Trigger: False or misleading information is spreading about the project, and community is reacting to it.
Do not respond immediately. Ask:
Rule: Responding to small FUD can make it bigger. Only respond when:
Type A — Factual Error (wrong numbers, fake screenshot, outdated info):
FACTUAL CORRECTION TEMPLATE:
──────────────────────────────
We've seen [brief description of the claim] spreading. Let's set the record straight.
[CLAIM]: "[Quote or summary of false claim]"
[FACT]: "[Accurate information with verifiable source — link to on-chain data, doc, or announcement]"
[Optional: Brief explanation of why this claim may have originated]
If you have questions, reach out at [contact] or join [Discord/Telegram].Type B — Deliberate Smear / Competitor Attack:
SMEAR RESPONSE TEMPLATE:
─────────────────────────
We're aware of [vague reference to campaign, don't amplify by naming it].
Rather than engage with bad-faith accusations, we'll let our work speak:
• [Recent achievement or verifiable metric]
• [Link to audit / transparency report]
• [Link to on-chain data or community vote]
We've always been transparent about [topic of accusation]. Here's the full context: [link]
The team is focused on building. That's where our energy stays.Type C — Influencer or KOL Spreading FUD:
Once the FUD is addressed publicly, post in Discord/Telegram:
Hey everyone — you may have seen [brief description] circulating.
Here's what's actually true: [facts + links]
The community team is monitoring this. No action needed from you.
If you see it spreading, you can share [link to official statement].
Thank you for trusting us to address it directly.Trigger: Token price is crashing, community is panicking, or a macroeconomic event is causing fear.
To the [Protocol] community:
Markets are moving. We see you, and we hear the concerns.
What we know doesn't change with price:
• [Milestone or development happening right now]
• [Team is full and committed — names/roles if helpful]
• [On-chain metric that shows real activity — TVL, transactions, active users]
What we're focused on:
• [Upcoming deliverable 1]
• [Upcoming deliverable 2]
We won't tell you what to do with your assets. We'll just keep building.
[Founder/Team name]
[Date and time — shows this is current, not a scheduled post]Trigger: Malicious governance proposal, hostile takeover attempt, governance vote being gamed, or community split on major decision.
Hour 1:
Governance Communication Template:
[GOVERNANCE ALERT] — [Proposal Number/Name]
We want to make sure the community has full context on [proposal].
WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED:
[Neutral, factual summary — no editorial yet]
WHAT THIS WOULD MEAN:
[Impact on protocol, treasury, users — factual]
OUR CONCERN / SUPPORT (if applicable):
[If the team has a position, state it clearly with reasoning]
WHAT WE'RE ASKING:
• Read the full proposal: [link]
• Join the discussion: [link to forum/Discord thread]
• Vote by [date and time]: [Snapshot link]
This is the community's decision. We're providing context to help you decide.Whether the team's preferred outcome wins or loses:
The community has voted [for/against] [proposal].
[If team supported it]: Thank you for your trust. Here's how we implement it: [next steps]
[If team opposed it]: We respect the outcome. Here's how we move forward together: [next steps]
Democracy in DAOs means accepting outcomes we disagree with. We remain committed to the community.Trigger: Team member involved in scandal, doxxed, or past behavior surfaced.
We have seen the reports regarding [role, not name unless public].
We take this seriously. Here is what we are doing:
1. [Specific action: e.g., "The team member has been removed from their role pending investigation"]
2. [Structural change: e.g., "We are reviewing our onboarding and vetting process"]
3. [Affected parties: e.g., "Anyone affected can reach us at [contact]"]
We understand this shakes trust. We are committed to [specific commitment].
Full update by [specific date].Trigger: Negative press article, investigative piece, or media narrative spreading about the project.
Level 1 — Minor blog post, small outlet, low traction:
Level 2 — Mid-tier outlet, growing traction:
Level 3 — Major outlet (CoinDesk, Bloomberg, Reuters, WSJ):
[Protocol Name] Response to [Publication] Article — [Date]
We have reviewed the [Publication] article published on [date].
[Point 1]: [Factual correction or clarification with source]
[Point 2]: [Context that was missing from the article]
[Point 3]: [What we are doing differently or have already done]
We are committed to transparency and welcome further questions at [press@protocol.com].
[Founder name], [Title]Trigger: Moderators acting badly, community is divided, internal drama escalating publicly.
To the [Protocol] community:
We've seen tensions rise around [topic]. We want to address this directly.
[Brief, honest summary of what happened — don't spin it]
We should have [what the team could have done better].
Going forward:
• [Specific change 1]
• [Specific change 2]
The community we're building is worth this work. Thank you for holding us accountable.
[Team]Trigger: Post-crisis, team wants to rebuild community trust and protocol reputation.
Week 1 — Radical Transparency:
Week 2 — Accountability Demonstration:
Week 3 — Proof of Work:
Week 4 — Forward Focus:
Crypto Crisis Communications Skill v1.0 Built for protocol marketing leads and DAO teams who need to communicate clearly and fast when things go wrong.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.