Context Budget Review

This is a Hermes-native context-budget-review workflow skill.

Why This Exists

context-budget-review ports ECC's context-budget and token-budget instincts into OMH as a compactness gate that protects long-running work without redefining success around a smaller task.

Do Not Use When

• The user asks for live token/cost telemetry; use ops-observability-card.
• The user asks to continue a loopable goal; use loop unless budget planning is the explicit blocker.
• The task is a short one-step answer with no meaningful context risk.

Examples

Good example:

• Prompt: context-budget-review 이 장기 PR 작업에서 어떤 맥락을 꼭 유지하고 언제 요약해야 하는지 잡아줘.
• Expected behavior: Prepare context_budget_plan/v1, must_keep_context_pack/v1, checkpoint plan, risk register, and overflow recovery route.
• Why: The request is about preserving context quality during long-running agent work.

Bad example:

• Prompt: context-budget-review 토큰 아끼려고 원래 목표를 더 작은 목표로 바꿔줘.
• Expected behavior: Reject goal shrinking and instead compact context while preserving the full objective and evidence gaps.
• Why: Budget review optimizes context handling, not the user's requested end state.

Completion Checklist

• The run or workflow scope, metric window, failure modes, and cost/latency boundary are named.
• Local telemetry, provider truth, billing truth, and completion evidence are separate states.
• Warnings name the next measurement or operator review action.

Recovery Notes

• If provider metrics are unavailable, report only local metadata and mark provider truth not_observed.
• If cost or latency looks risky, surface a warning plus the next measurement rather than a completion claim.

Workflow Lane

• Current lane: Automation and status (achievements, workspace-audit, production-audit, automation-blueprint, github-event-ops, buzz, agent-board, gateway-intent-card, +34 more) - schedules, status, health, and ops review.
• If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
• Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.

Use When

Use before long-running research, coding, review, or multi-agent work when context, token, cost, or summary drift could break quality.

Strong routing signals: context-budget-review, context budget review, context budget, token budget review, token budget, prompt budget, context compaction, compact context, too much context, summarization checkpoint, budget this task, 컨텍스트 예산, 토큰 예산, 컨텍스트 압축, 요약 체크포인트

Catalog Metadata

Category: observability Phase: context-budget-review Hermes role: tracker Quality tier: context-budget-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

• Name must-keep context before summarizing or delegating long work.
• Separate durable requirements, volatile status, file refs, verification evidence, and open blockers.
• Define checkpoint cadence, overflow recovery, and continuity verification.
• Use bounded copy while preserving the full objective and evidence gaps.

Handoff policy:

Keep budget design and status narration in Hermes. Provider billing, exact token usage, runtime compaction, and executor cost evidence require observed wrapper, runtime, or provider data.

Required inputs:

• task or workflow scope
• expected duration, artifacts, and handoff surfaces
• available context sources and must-keep facts
• token, cost, latency, or message-size constraints when known

Expected outputs:

• context_budget_plan/v1
• must_keep_context_pack/v1
• summarization_checkpoint_plan/v1
• budget_risk_register/v1
• overflow_recovery_route/v1
• not-evidence boundary

Artifact expectations:

• context_budget_plan/v1 with scope, max visible context, source priority, discard rules, and checkpoint cadence
• must_keep_context_pack/v1 with durable facts, file refs, decisions, PR/CI state, and blocked assumptions
• summarization_checkpoint_plan/v1 with when to compact, what to preserve, and how to verify continuity
• budget_risk_register/v1 separating estimated cost/token/latency risk from provider-observed truth

Safety rules:

• Do not claim provider billing, exact token counts, or runtime compaction occurred without observed evidence.
• Do not drop user requirements, file paths, PR state, verification gaps, or explicit constraints during compaction.
• Keep estimated budget risk, observed usage, checkpoint summaries, and completion evidence separate.
• Do not use budget pressure as a reason to shrink the user's requested end state.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: context-budget-review.

sh
omh runtime record --skill context-budget-review --harness context-budget-review --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

• Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.

Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.