Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →runtsang/citation-verification
Verification guide for citations added during rebuttal writing.
Passed 21 of 25 test cases with the skill, and 13 of 25 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
8 fixed13 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We want to cite our own lab's prior workshop paper from last year in our AAAI rebuttal response. What key check must be performed regarding our submission's reference list?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Advises verifying that the venue, year, and paper title match what appears in the submission's reference list | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
RebuttalStudio Utility — Stage 2 / Stage 4 Apply this skill whenever a Stage 2 draft or Stage 4 follow-up response introduces a new reference — especially when the reference was suggested by an LLM. A single fabricated citation in a rebuttal can undermine the entire response's credibility.
Verification principles and workflow for citations added during the rebuttal writing process.
Rebuttal citations are uniquely dangerous compared to paper citations:
Core rule: Never add a citation to a rebuttal response unless you have personally verified it exists via search.
Verify any citation that was:
Existing citations from the paper itself generally do not need re-verification — but do confirm the claim you are citing actually appears in that work.
Use a reliable academic search engine:
test cases passed, vs 13 / 25 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.