Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Track long-horizon objectives across multiple sessions with milestone checkpoints, progress persistence, and drift detection
.claude/skills/ruvnet-horizon-track/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 51% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -48% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 164% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 116% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -9% | 0% |
Track long-running objectives that span multiple sessions, days, or weeks.
When an objective is too large for a single session — multi-week features, research programs, migration projects, or any work that requires persistent progress tracking across conversations.
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_store with namespace horizons and key horizon-[name]:json { "objective": "...", "created": "2026-04-28", "targetDate": "2026-05-15", "milestones": [ {"id": "m1", "name": "...", "criteria": "...", "status": "pending"}, {"id": "m2", "name": "...", "criteria": "...", "status": "pending"} ], "currentMilestone": "m1", "sessions": [] }
mcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__memory_retrieve key horizon-[name] namespace horizonsmcp__plugin_ruflo-core_ruflo__hooks_intelligence_pattern-storehorizons — active horizon definitions and statehorizon-sessions — per-session summaries keyed by [horizon]-[date]horizon-learnings — patterns and insights discovered during the horizon| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-14 | fail→pass | 27,083 | 4,210 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 598 | 900 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 8,794 | 1,296 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,531 | 793 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 13,789 | 9,683 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,562 | 2,224 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 4,056 | 4,661 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 286 | 828 | +190% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 8,606 | 5,550 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,465 | 1,041 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 4,116 | 4,338 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 217 | 867 | +300% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,636 | 7,749 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,716 | 2,104 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 5,294 | 15,107 | +185% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,146 | 1,822 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 9,316 | 8,663 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,574 | 1,194 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 5,515 | 11,763 | +113% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 950 | 1,367 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 14,324 | 8,867 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,396 | 2,182 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,159 | 6,758 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,977 | 1,759 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 4,681 | 8,630 | +84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 835 | 2,208 | +164% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 5,946 | 1,932 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,082 | 863 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 6,533 | 7,411 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,215 | 1,405 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 4,513 | 5,563 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 832 | 1,749 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 5,717 | 19,368 | +239% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,274 | 2,753 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 7,283 | 1,863 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,129 | 920 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 5,213 | 1,829 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,045 | 946 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 4,527 | 4,059 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 755 | 1,248 | +65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 9,513 | 8,499 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,637 | 1,966 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 11,119 | 8,720 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,896 | 2,214 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 15 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 15 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.