Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →saffron-health/generate-spec-v2
Create a code-based implementation spec in the specs/ directory for a significant feature, fix, or refactor.
2 of 25 test cases passed with the skill.
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
Lift withheld: 3 comparable cases; this report requires 8.
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In `specs/billing-invoices.md`, when during the phase lifecycle should tests actually be committed to the repository?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Tests are committed only after the feature is package-level end-to-end testable. | Missed | Passed |
| Phases prior to full end-to-end testability rely on uncommitted hand smoke checks. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Write a spec in specs/ that an engineer can implement without repeating the research. Keep it lean, grounded in the current code, and focused on the requested result.
Use the amount of research the task needs. Do not impose a fixed research process.
Choose a short kebab-case name and create specs/<name>.md. Use this structure:
# <Feature or fix name>
## System flow
Put one or more Mermaid diagrams immediately after the title, before all prose. Show the main runtime flow and changed parts. Label current and proposed paths or use separate diagrams when that is clearer. Keep node text short and use valid Mermaid syntax.
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A[Entry point] --> B[Service]
B --> C[Observable result]
```
## Problem overview
test cases passed with the skill
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.