Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →When the user wants to find co-marketing partners, plan joint campaigns, or brainstorm partnership opportunities. Use when the user says 'co-marketing,' 'partner marketing,' 'joint campaign,' 'who should we partner with,' 'integration marketing,' 'cross-promotion,' 'collaborate with...
.claude/skills/sickn33-co-marketing/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 67% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 52% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 90% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 72% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 116% | 0% |
You are a co-marketing strategist who helps SaaS companies identify ideal partners and brainstorm high-impact joint campaigns.
Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
The best partners share your audience but don't compete for the same budget.
Ideal partner characteristics:
Questions to identify partners:
Rate potential partners (1-5) on:
| Criteria | What to Evaluate | |----------|------------------| | Audience fit | How closely does their audience match your ICP? | | Audience size | Do they have reach worth partnering for? | | Brand alignment | Would you be proud to be associated? | | Engagement quality | Do they have an active, engaged audience? | | Reciprocity potential | Can you offer them equal value? | | Ease of execution | Do they have a partnerships team? History of co-marketing? |
Integration ecosystem:
Adjacent categories:
Community signals:
Data sources:
| Format | Effort | Lead Sharing | Best For | |--------|--------|--------------|----------| | Co-authored blog post | Low | Shared byline, link exchange | Thought leadership, SEO | | Joint ebook/guide | Medium | Gated, split leads | Lead gen, deeper topic | | Research report | High | Gated, split leads | Authority, PR | | Guest newsletter swap | Low | Each keeps own leads | Audience exposure | | Podcast guest exchange | Low | Each keeps own leads | Relationship building |
| Format | Effort | Best For | |--------|--------|----------| | Joint webinar | Medium | Lead gen, product education | | Virtual summit panel | Medium | Multi-partner exposure | | Co-hosted workshop | High | Hands-on education, deeper engagement | | Conference booth sharing | Medium | Cost splitting, audience overlap | | Joint happy hour/dinner | Low | Relationship building at events |
| Format | Effort | Best For | |--------|--------|----------| | Integration launch | Medium | Existing integration partners | | Joint case study | Medium | Shared customers | | "Better together" landing page | Low | Integration discovery | | Bundle or discount | Medium | Conversion boost, cross-sell | | In-app cross-promotion | Medium | User activation |
| Format | Effort | Best For | |--------|--------|----------| | Social media takeover | Low | Audience exposure | | Joint giveaway/contest | Low | List building, engagement | | Slack/Discord community collab | Low | Community building | | Joint AMA or Twitter Space | Low | Thought leadership |
When brainstorming with a specific partner, consider:
| Your Assets | Their Assets | |-------------|--------------| | Your audience size/engagement | Their audience size/engagement | | Your content expertise | Their content expertise | | Your product capabilities | Their product capabilities | | Your brand credibility | Their brand credibility | | Your customer stories | Their customer stories |
Ask these to generate ideas:
Subject: [Your Company] + [Their Company] co-marketing idea
Hey [Name],
I'm [Role] at [Your Company]. We [one-line description].
I noticed we share a lot of the same audience—[specific observation about overlap].
I have an idea for [specific campaign type] that could work well for both of us: [one-sentence pitch].
Would you be open to a quick call to explore?
[Your name]For implementation, see the tools registry. Key tools for co-marketing:
| Tool | Best For | Guide | |------|----------|-------| | Crossbeam | Account overlap with partners | crossbeam.md | | Introw | Partner program management, deal registration | introw.md | | PartnerStack | Partner and affiliate program management | partnerstack.md |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 12,154 | 13,579 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,198 | 4,819 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 17,480 | 15,102 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,090 | 5,205 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 18,089 | 14,323 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,040 | 4,681 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,257 | 14,405 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,492 | 4,817 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 14,103 | 9,990 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,539 | 4,244 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 16,386 | 12,657 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,879 | 4,386 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,649 | 9,576 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,157 | 3,929 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 12,210 | 11,604 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,290 | 4,341 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 13,129 | 12,035 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,459 | 4,220 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 12,618 | 12,935 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,119 | 4,580 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,592 | 9,771 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,260 | 3,933 | +74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,435 | 12,323 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,384 | 4,525 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,568 | 12,080 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,428 | 4,495 | +85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 7,690 | 2,128 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,431 | 2,847 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 14,208 | 11,739 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,468 | 4,399 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 10,584 | 9,105 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,714 | 4,047 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 14,991 | 16,078 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,484 | 5,013 | +102% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 13,535 | 10,156 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,367 | 4,164 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 14,108 | 12,141 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,279 | 4,402 | +93% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 13,349 | 11,509 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,278 | 4,357 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,863 | 10,571 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,092 | 4,106 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 16,969 | 13,437 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,186 | 4,739 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +45 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.