Drizzle Migration Conflict

Use this skill to help a user diagnose, repair, and prevent Drizzle Kit migration conflicts in a multi-developer repository. Drizzle migrations encode both SQL and migration snapshots, so the safe answer depends on the current migration directory shape, the Drizzle Kit version, and the git state.

When to Use This Skill

• Use when Drizzle migration files, _journal.json, or snapshot.json conflict after a pull, merge, rebase, or PR update.
• Use when drizzle-kit check reports non-commutative migrations or migration folder conflicts.
• Use when a team wants a safe repair flow for generated Drizzle migrations after schema changes converge.
• Use when designing CI or merge-queue policy to prevent repeated Drizzle migration conflicts.

Safety rules

• Start in read-only diagnosis mode unless the user explicitly asks to fix files.
• Do not run drizzle-kit migrate, drizzle-kit push, database seed scripts, or any command that

connects to a live database unless the user explicitly requests it and the target is clear.

• Treat drizzle-kit check, project typechecks, and tests as command execution that may load project

config, environment variables, or scripts. Inspect scripts/config first, and require an explicit non-production or disposable target before any DB-backed validation.

• Do not delete migration files, rewrite _journal.json, or run git checkout --ours,

git checkout --theirs, git restore, or rm unless the user has confirmed the exact side and files to change.

• Do not recommend drizzle-kit push as the production solution for migration conflicts; it skips

the auditable migration history that teams need.

• Treat --ignore-conflicts as an exception for a known false positive, not as the normal fix.
• Preserve schema source code changes unless the user explicitly asks to discard them. Conflict

repair normally discards generated migrations and regenerates them from the merged schema.

• If ours and theirs could mean different branches depending on merge direction, ask the user to

identify the parent branch before suggesting checkout commands.

Required references

• Read references/sources.md when the answer depends on current Drizzle behavior, official

guidance, or one of the preserved external links.

• Read references/conflict-resolution.md before recommending a repair flow.
• Read references/ci-policy.md before proposing CI, merge queue, or team workflow changes.
• Read references/report-template.md before writing a diagnostic report.

Source references

The full list of official docs, Drizzle GitHub discussions, community scripts, and merge-queue references lives in references/sources.md with trust levels and caveats. Read that file whenever the answer depends on current Drizzle behavior. Re-verify the official docs and the most relevant discussion when the project's drizzle-kit major version changes, since migration internals (snapshot format, journal shape, drizzle-kit check semantics) have shifted between releases.

Mode selection

Classify the task first:

1. Diagnose - The user has a conflict or failed drizzle-kit check and wants to understand it.
2. Repair - The user explicitly asks to fix or regenerate migration files.
3. CI hardening - The user wants to prevent future conflicts in PRs or merge queues.
4. Explain - The user wants a conceptual answer or a team playbook.

When the mode is not explicit, choose Diagnose.

Each mode unlocks a specific set of actions. Do not cross these boundaries without an explicit upgrade:

• Diagnose - read-only only. Run git status, git ls-files -u, the helper script, and file

inspection. Do not run drizzle-kit check, typechecks, tests, or any write command. Report findings and the proposed repair path, but do not execute it.

• Repair - adds file writes and drizzle-kit generate/check execution, each gated by the

Safety rules and explicit confirmation of the exact files and side (ours/theirs) to change.

• CI hardening - adds proposing or editing CI/workflow files. Do not run migration commands

against the user's database to validate the workflow; validate the workflow syntax and logic only.

• Explain - conceptual only. No commands against the repo beyond optional read-only inspection.

Repository discovery

Collect repo facts before giving commands:

bash
git status --short
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
git ls-files -u
rg --files -g 'drizzle.config.*' -g 'package.json' -g 'pnpm-lock.yaml' -g 'yarn.lock' -g 'package-lock.json'

Then inspect the relevant files:

• drizzle.config.* for out, schema, dialect, and config shape.
• package.json scripts for the project-approved generate, check, and migrate commands.
• package.json dependencies or lockfile snippets for drizzle-kit and drizzle-orm versions.
• The migration output directory, either from config or common names like drizzle/, migrations/,

or src/db/migrations/.

If this skill's helper script is available, run it in read-only mode:

bash
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/check_drizzle_migrations.py --root .

Resolve <skill-dir> to the installed skill directory before running. Check these locations in order and use the first that contains scripts/check_drizzle_migrations.py:

1. The target repository's vendored copy: <repo-root>/skills/drizzle-migration-conflict.
2. The Claude Code skills directory: ~/.claude/skills/drizzle-migration-conflict.
3. Any other install location reported by the user's environment.

If none of these resolve, fall back to the manual git/rg inspection commands above and tell the user the helper script was not found. Use --config <file> and --migrations-dir <dir> when the project has multiple Drizzle configs or outputs. The script never connects to a database and never writes files; it only reads migration directories and reports structural issues.

Migration structure decision

Identify the structure before proposing a fix:

• Legacy structure: <out>/meta/_journal.json, <out>/meta/*_snapshot.json, and root-level

migration SQL files such as <out>/0003_name.sql.

• Folder-based structure: each migration is a directory containing migration.sql and

snapshot.json.

• Unknown or mixed structure: stop and report ambiguity. Do not guess a destructive repair.

Recommended repair principles

• Resolve schema source conflicts first. The regenerated migration must reflect the merged schema,

not one side's stale snapshot.

• Treat the parent or target branch migration history as the source of truth when repairing a feature

branch after updating from that branch.

• Prefer discarding and regenerating generated migration artifacts over hand-editing journal or

snapshot files.

• After regeneration, validate in tiers: database-free structural checks first; then drizzle-kit

check only after confirming its config/env cannot point at production; then project tests only after inspecting the scripts and any database targets.

• If the user asks to apply changes, state exactly which files will be changed before performing the

write.

Output rules

• Use the user's language when practical, but keep command snippets and file paths literal.
• State the detected migration structure and selected mode.
• Separate confirmed conflicts from assumptions and missing evidence.
• Give a safe default path first, then optional automation or CI hardening.
• For destructive steps, label them as "requires confirmation" and explain what will be lost.
• Never echo secrets. When inspecting drizzle.config.*, .env, or environment variables, do not

include database URLs, passwords, tokens, or connection strings in the report. Reference them as <redacted> or describe only whether they point at a production-like target.

• Use the conclusion values from references/report-template.md for diagnostic reports:

NO_CONFLICT_FOUND, SAFE_TO_REGENERATE, NEEDS_USER_CONFIRMATION, or BLOCKED_BY_AMBIGUITY.

Limitations

• This skill cannot guarantee that a regenerated migration is production-safe without review against the target database state and deployment process.
• It does not run DB-backed migration commands unless the user explicitly confirms the target and the command.
• It is focused on Drizzle Kit migration conflicts, not general schema design or application-query optimization.

Test prompts

Use these prompts to validate the skill behavior:

• "My Drizzle _journal.json and 0003_snapshot.json conflict during merge. Tell me what to do."
• "We upgraded to the migration folder layout and drizzle-kit check reports a non-commutative conflict."
• "Design CI so our team stops merging broken Drizzle migrations."
• "Can I solve this production Drizzle migration conflict with drizzle-kit push?"
• "Use the links in the skill to re-check the current official Drizzle migration conflict guidance."
• "We're halfway through moving from the legacy flat layout to folder-based migrations. How do we handle a conflict during the transition?"
• "Our drizzle.config.ts sets out from process.env.MIGRATIONS_DIR, and the helper says no out directory was found. What now?"
• "drizzle-kit check keeps failing on a migration we know commutes. Can we just always pass --ignore-conflicts?"