Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications, inspired by [Dify](https://github.com/langgenius/dify) and industry best practices.
.claude/skills/sickn33-llm-app-patterns/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 169% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 97% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 125% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 228% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 210% | 0% |
> Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications, inspired by Dify and industry best practices.
Use this skill when:
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) grounds LLM responses in your data.
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Ingest │────▶│ Retrieve │────▶│ Generate │
│ Documents │ │ Context │ │ Response │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│ Chunking│ │ Vector │ │ LLM │
│Embedding│ │ Search │ │ + Context│
└─────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘python# Chunking strategies class ChunkingStrategy: # Fixed-size chunks (simple but may break context) FIXED_SIZE = "fixed_size" # e.g., 512 tokens # Semantic chunking (preserves meaning) SEMANTIC = "semantic" # Split on paragraphs/sections # Recursive splitting (tries multiple separators) RECURSIVE = "recursive" # ["\n\n", "\n", " ", ""] # Document-aware (respects structure) DOCUMENT_AWARE = "document_aware" # Headers, lists, etc. # Recommended settings CHUNK_CONFIG = { "chunk_size": 512, # tokens "chunk_overlap": 50, # token overlap between chunks "separators": ["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " "], }
python# Vector database selection VECTOR_DB_OPTIONS = { "pinecone": { "use_case": "Production, managed service", "scale": "Billions of vectors", "features": ["Hybrid search", "Metadata filtering"] }, "weaviate": { "use_case": "Self-hosted, multi-modal", "scale": "Millions of vectors", "features": ["GraphQL API", "Modules"] }, "chromadb": { "use_case": "Development, prototyping", "scale": "Thousands of vectors", "features": ["Simple API", "In-memory option"] }, "pgvector": { "use_case": "Existing Postgres infrastructure", "scale": "Millions of vectors", "features": ["SQL integration", "ACID compliance"] } } # Embedding model selection EMBEDDING_MODELS = { "openai/text-embedding-3-small": { "dimensions": 1536, "cost": "$0.02/1M tokens", "quality": "Good for most use cases" }, "openai/text-embedding-3-large": { "dimensions": 3072, "cost": "$0.13/1M tokens", "quality": "Best for complex queries" }, "local/bge-large": { "dimensions": 1024, "cost": "Free (compute only)", "quality": "Comparable to OpenAI small" } }
python# Basic semantic search def semantic_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5): query_embedding = embed(query) results = vector_db.similarity_search( query_embedding, top_k=top_k ) return results # Hybrid search (semantic + keyword) def hybrid_search(query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.5): """ alpha=1.0: Pure semantic alpha=0.0: Pure keyword (BM25) alpha=0.5: Balanced """ semantic_results = vector_db.similarity_search(query) keyword_results = bm25_search(query) # Reciprocal Rank Fusion return rrf_merge(semantic_results, keyword_results, alpha) # Multi-query retrieval def multi_query_retrieval(query: str): """Generate multiple query variations for better recall""" queries = llm.generate_query_variations(query, n=3) all_results = [] for q in queries: all_results.extend(semantic_search(q)) return deduplicate(all_results) # Contextual compression def compressed_retrieval(query: str): """Retrieve then compress to relevant parts only""" docs = semantic_search(query, top_k=10) compressed = llm.extract_relevant_parts(docs, query) return compressed
pythonRAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE = """ Answer the user's question based ONLY on the following context. If the context doesn't contain enough information, say "I don't have enough information to answer that." Context: {context} Question: {question} Answer:""" def generate_with_rag(question: str): # Retrieve context_docs = hybrid_search(question, top_k=5) context = "\n\n".join([doc.content for doc in context_docs]) # Generate prompt = RAG_PROMPT_TEMPLATE.format( context=context, question=question ) response = llm.generate(prompt) # Return with citations return { "answer": response, "sources": [doc.metadata for doc in context_docs] }
Thought: I need to search for information about X
Action: search("X")
Observation: [search results]
Thought: Based on the results, I should...
Action: calculate(...)
Observation: [calculation result]
Thought: I now have enough information
Action: final_answer("The answer is...")pythonREACT_PROMPT = """ You are an AI assistant that can use tools to answer questions. Available tools: {tools_description} Use this format: Thought: [your reasoning about what to do next] Action: [tool_name(arguments)] Observation: [tool result - this will be filled in] ... (repeat Thought/Action/Observation as needed) Thought: I have enough information to answer Final Answer: [your final response] Question: {question} """ class ReActAgent: def __init__(self, tools: list, llm): self.tools = {t.name: t for t in tools} self.llm = llm self.max_iterations = 10 def run(self, question: str) -> str: prompt = REACT_PROMPT.format( tools_description=self._format_tools(), question=question ) for _ in range(self.max_iterations): response = self.llm.generate(prompt) if "Final Answer:" in response: return self._extract_final_answer(response) action = self._parse_action(response) observation = self._execute_tool(action) prompt += f"\nObservation: {observation}\n" return "Max iterations reached"
python# Define tools as functions with schemas TOOLS = [ { "name": "search_web", "description": "Search the web for current information", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": { "query": { "type": "string", "description": "Search query" } }, "required": ["query"] } }, { "name": "calculate", "description": "Perform mathematical calculations", "parameters": { "type": "object", "properties": { "expression": { "type": "string", "description": "Math expression to evaluate" } }, "required": ["expression"] } } ] class FunctionCallingAgent: def run(self, question: str) -> str: messages = [{"role": "user", "content": question}] while True: response = self.llm.chat( messages=messages, tools=TOOLS, tool_choice="auto" ) if response.tool_calls: for tool_call in response.tool_calls: result = self._execute_tool( tool_call.name, tool_call.arguments ) messages.append({ "role": "tool", "tool_call_id": tool_call.id, "content": str(result) }) else: return response.content
pythonclass PlanAndExecuteAgent: """ 1. Create a plan (list of steps) 2. Execute each step 3. Replan if needed """ def run(self, task: str) -> str: # Planning phase plan = self.planner.create_plan(task) # Returns: ["Step 1: ...", "Step 2: ...", ...] results = [] for step in plan: # Execute each step result = self.executor.execute(step, context=results) results.append(result) # Check if replan needed if self._needs_replan(task, results): new_plan = self.planner.replan( task, completed=results, remaining=plan[len(results):] ) plan = new_plan # Synthesize final answer return self.synthesizer.summarize(task, results)
pythonclass AgentTeam: """ Specialized agents collaborating on complex tasks """ def __init__(self): self.agents = { "researcher": ResearchAgent(), "analyst": AnalystAgent(), "writer": WriterAgent(), "critic": CriticAgent() } self.coordinator = CoordinatorAgent() def solve(self, task: str) -> str: # Coordinator assigns subtasks assignments = self.coordinator.decompose(task) results = {} for assignment in assignments: agent = self.agents[assignment.agent] result = agent.execute( assignment.subtask, context=results ) results[assignment.id] = result # Critic reviews critique = self.agents["critic"].review(results) if critique.needs_revision: # Iterate with feedback return self.solve_with_feedback(task, results, critique) return self.coordinator.synthesize(results)
pythonclass PromptTemplate: def __init__(self, template: str, variables: list[str]): self.template = template self.variables = variables def format(self, **kwargs) -> str: # Validate all variables provided missing = set(self.variables) - set(kwargs.keys()) if missing: raise ValueError(f"Missing variables: {missing}") return self.template.format(**kwargs) def with_examples(self, examples: list[dict]) -> str: """Add few-shot examples""" example_text = "\n\n".join([ f"Input: {ex['input']}\nOutput: {ex['output']}" for ex in examples ]) return f"{example_text}\n\n{self.template}" # Usage summarizer = PromptTemplate( template="Summarize the following text in {style} style:\n\n{text}", variables=["style", "text"] ) prompt = summarizer.format( style="professional", text="Long article content..." )
pythonclass PromptRegistry: def __init__(self, db): self.db = db def register(self, name: str, template: str, version: str): """Store prompt with version""" self.db.save({ "name": name, "template": template, "version": version, "created_at": datetime.now(), "metrics": {} }) def get(self, name: str, version: str = "latest") -> str: """Retrieve specific version""" return self.db.get(name, version) def ab_test(self, name: str, user_id: str) -> str: """Return variant based on user bucket""" variants = self.db.get_all_versions(name) bucket = hash(user_id) % len(variants) return variants[bucket] def record_outcome(self, prompt_id: str, outcome: dict): """Track prompt performance""" self.db.update_metrics(prompt_id, outcome)
pythonclass PromptChain: """ Chain prompts together, passing output as input to next """ def __init__(self, steps: list[dict]): self.steps = steps def run(self, initial_input: str) -> dict: context = {"input": initial_input} results = [] for step in self.steps: prompt = step["prompt"].format(**context) output = llm.generate(prompt) # Parse output if needed if step.get("parser"): output = step"parser" context[step["output_key"]] = output results.append({ "step": step["name"], "output": output }) return { "final_output": context[self.steps[-1]["output_key"]], "intermediate_results": results } # Example: Research → Analyze → Summarize chain = PromptChain([ { "name": "research", "prompt": "Research the topic: {input}", "output_key": "research" }, { "name": "analyze", "prompt": "Analyze these findings:\n{research}", "output_key": "analysis" }, { "name": "summarize", "prompt": "Summarize this analysis in 3 bullet points:\n{analysis}", "output_key": "summary" } ])
pythonLLM_METRICS = { # Performance "latency_p50": "50th percentile response time", "latency_p99": "99th percentile response time", "tokens_per_second": "Generation speed", # Quality "user_satisfaction": "Thumbs up/down ratio", "task_completion": "% tasks completed successfully", "hallucination_rate": "% responses with factual errors", # Cost "cost_per_request": "Average $ per API call", "tokens_per_request": "Average tokens used", "cache_hit_rate": "% requests served from cache", # Reliability "error_rate": "% failed requests", "timeout_rate": "% requests that timed out", "retry_rate": "% requests needing retry" }
pythonimport logging from opentelemetry import trace tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__) class LLMLogger: def log_request(self, request_id: str, data: dict): """Log LLM request for debugging and analysis""" log_entry = { "request_id": request_id, "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(), "model": data["model"], "prompt": data["prompt"][:500], # Truncate for storage "prompt_tokens": data["prompt_tokens"], "temperature": data.get("temperature", 1.0), "user_id": data.get("user_id"), } logging.info(f"LLM_REQUEST: {json.dumps(log_entry)}") def log_response(self, request_id: str, data: dict): """Log LLM response""" log_entry = { "request_id": request_id, "completion_tokens": data["completion_tokens"], "total_tokens": data["total_tokens"], "latency_ms": data["latency_ms"], "finish_reason": data["finish_reason"], "cost_usd": self._calculate_cost(data), } logging.info(f"LLM_RESPONSE: {json.dumps(log_entry)}") # Distributed tracing @tracer.start_as_current_span("llm_call") def call_llm(prompt: str) -> str: span = trace.get_current_span() span.set_attribute("prompt.length", len(prompt)) response = llm.generate(prompt) span.set_attribute("response.length", len(response)) span.set_attribute("tokens.total", response.usage.total_tokens) return response.content
pythonclass LLMEvaluator: """ Evaluate LLM outputs for quality """ def evaluate_response(self, question: str, response: str, ground_truth: str = None) -> dict: scores = {} # Relevance: Does it answer the question? scores["relevance"] = self._score_relevance(question, response) # Coherence: Is it well-structured? scores["coherence"] = self._score_coherence(response) # Groundedness: Is it based on provided context? scores["groundedness"] = self._score_groundedness(response) # Accuracy: Does it match ground truth? if ground_truth: scores["accuracy"] = self._score_accuracy(response, ground_truth) # Harmfulness: Is it safe? scores["safety"] = self._score_safety(response) return scores def run_benchmark(self, test_cases: list[dict]) -> dict: """Run evaluation on test set""" results = [] for case in test_cases: response = llm.generate(case["prompt"]) scores = self.evaluate_response( question=case["prompt"], response=response, ground_truth=case.get("expected") ) results.append(scores) return self._aggregate_scores(results)
pythonimport hashlib from functools import lru_cache class LLMCache: def __init__(self, redis_client, ttl_seconds=3600): self.redis = redis_client self.ttl = ttl_seconds def _cache_key(self, prompt: str, model: str, **kwargs) -> str: """Generate deterministic cache key""" content = f"{model}:{prompt}:{json.dumps(kwargs, sort_keys=True)}" return hashlib.sha256(content.encode()).hexdigest() def get_or_generate(self, prompt: str, model: str, **kwargs) -> str: key = self._cache_key(prompt, model, **kwargs) # Check cache cached = self.redis.get(key) if cached: return cached.decode() # Generate response = llm.generate(prompt, model=model, **kwargs) # Cache (only cache deterministic outputs) if kwargs.get("temperature", 1.0) == 0: self.redis.setex(key, self.ttl, response) return response
pythonimport time from tenacity import retry, wait_exponential, stop_after_attempt class RateLimiter: def __init__(self, requests_per_minute: int): self.rpm = requests_per_minute self.timestamps = [] def acquire(self): """Wait if rate limit would be exceeded""" now = time.time() # Remove old timestamps self.timestamps = [t for t in self.timestamps if now - t < 60] if len(self.timestamps) >= self.rpm: sleep_time = 60 - (now - self.timestamps[0]) time.sleep(sleep_time) self.timestamps.append(time.time()) # Retry with exponential backoff @retry( wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=4, max=60), stop=stop_after_attempt(5) ) def call_llm_with_retry(prompt: str) -> str: try: return llm.generate(prompt) except RateLimitError: raise # Will trigger retry except APIError as e: if e.status_code >= 500: raise # Retry server errors raise # Don't retry client errors
pythonclass LLMWithFallback: def __init__(self, primary: str, fallbacks: list[str]): self.primary = primary self.fallbacks = fallbacks def generate(self, prompt: str, **kwargs) -> str: models = [self.primary] + self.fallbacks for model in models: try: return llm.generate(prompt, model=model, **kwargs) except (RateLimitError, APIError) as e: logging.warning(f"Model {model} failed: {e}") continue raise AllModelsFailedError("All models exhausted") # Usage llm_client = LLMWithFallback( primary="gpt-4-turbo", fallbacks=["gpt-3.5-turbo", "claude-3-sonnet"] )
| Pattern | Use When | Complexity | Cost | | :------------------- | :--------------- | :--------- | :-------- | | Simple RAG | FAQ, docs search | Low | Low | | Hybrid RAG | Mixed queries | Medium | Medium | | ReAct Agent | Multi-step tasks | Medium | Medium | | Function Calling | Structured tools | Low | Low | | Plan-Execute | Complex tasks | High | High | | Multi-Agent | Research tasks | Very High | Very High |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | 12,498 | 27,350 | +119% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,733 | 11,874 | +334% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 23,366 | 25,552 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,645 | 10,692 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 31,485 | 20,905 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,033 | 9,879 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 26,286 | 26,458 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,387 | 11,225 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 22,660 | 18,397 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,667 | 9,707 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 25,760 | 21,584 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,723 | 9,705 | +105% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 17,186 | 13,929 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,711 | 8,825 | +138% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 14,455 | 7,016 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,516 | 7,104 | +182% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 20,817 | 15,506 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,833 | 8,813 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 18,205 | 17,789 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,457 | 9,306 | +169% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 20,140 | 20,633 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,148 | 9,834 | +137% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 20,896 | 22,972 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,918 | 10,497 | +168% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 19,046 | 14,918 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,851 | 8,904 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 40,110 | 18,452 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,400 | 9,521 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 16,318 | 15,469 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,178 | 8,729 | +175% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 18,367 | 18,430 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,863 | 9,750 | +152% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 23,877 | 19,932 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,026 | 9,906 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 23,148 | 22,299 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,632 | 10,424 | +125% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 23,683 | 22,345 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,469 | 10,292 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 18,243 | 24,936 | +37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,504 | 10,878 | +210% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 13,973 | 14,717 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,686 | 8,797 | +228% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 28,804 | 27,183 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,634 | 10,393 | +124% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 18,207 | 15,536 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,322 | 8,666 | +161% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.