Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →sickn33/requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 14 of 22 without it.
and 2 more in the full report
5 fixed15 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When formatting a code review request payload for the `superpowers:code-reviewer` subagent tool, what specific parameter fields must be included in the template?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Lists WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED, PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS, BASE_SHA, HEAD_SHA, and DESCRIPTION as template parameters. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade.
Core principle: Review early, review often.
Mandatory:
Optional but valuable:
1. Get git SHAs:
BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1) # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:
Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at code-reviewer.md
Placeholders:
{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do{BASE_SHA} - Starting commit{HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit{DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary3. Act on feedback:
test cases passed, vs 14 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.